Cases

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alison Y. Tuitt, J.), entered August 24, 2011, which, to the extent appealed from, denied the petition seeking a permanent stay of arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, and dismissed the proceeding brought pursuant to CELR article 75, unanimously modified, on the law, to reinstate the proceeding, grant petitioner’s alternative request for a temporary stay of arbitration pending a determination regarding the insura

WARNER, J. Rufino Hernandez appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion to quash service of process, claiming that the trial court erred in determining that the plaintiff had sufficiently complied with the statutory prerequisites for substituted service. We agree and reverse, because the allegations of the complaint concerning service were not sufficient to invoke substituted service over the appellant, and the plaintif

LEVINE, J. State Farm appeals the dismissal of its petition seeking discovery from Del-ray Medical Center pursuant to Florida’s PIP statutes. We are asked to determine whether section - 627.736 permits State Farm to request discovery about the reasonableness of charges by Delray Medical, including discovery regarding the amount others paid to Delray Medical for the same services

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-23-00226-CV JESUS RODRIGUEZ, Appellant v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, NISTICO, CROUCH & KESSLER, P.C., MICHAEL L. TIPSORD, GUSTAVO HERNANDEZ, DIANA K. BARNES AND COPART CORPORATION, Appellees From the 12th District Cou

49 So.3d 815 (2010) Alexander G. SARIS, Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, State Farm Florida Insurance Company, Hustriberto Hernandez, Bruno M. Pires, National Union Fire Insurance Company Of Pittsburgh Pennsylvania, and American Home Assurance Company, Appellees. No. 4D09-886. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. December 1, 2010.</

In re AIG Worker’s Compensation; American Home Assurance Co. A/K/A; — Other(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari *1251and/or Review, Parish of Pointe Coupee, 18th Judicial District Court Div. A, Nos. 32,497, 32,101; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Nos. 2010 CA 0961, 2010 CA 0962. Denied.

GUIDRY, J. | .-¡American Home Assurance Company, also known as American International Group, Inc. Worker’s Compensation (“AIGWC”), appeals a summary judgment of the trial court dismissing its claim for reimbursement against the Evanston Insurance Company (“Evanston”). The underlying facts of this case, which has previously come before this court twice on appeal,1 are not in dispute and will only

719 S.E.2d 597 (2011) 312 Ga. App. 756 STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY et al. v. HERNANDEZ AUTO PAINTING AND BODY WORKS, INC. Hernandez Auto Painting and Body Works, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al. Nos. A11A0962, A11A0963. Court of Appeals of Georgia. November 21, 2011.

444 F.Supp.2d 622 (2006) STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Candy C. LOGAN, Oliver Lynch, Fastino Juan Hernandez, Sherrie Aiken, Charles Aiken, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and The Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford ("AIC"), Defendants. C.A. No. 2:05-2094-PMD. United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Charleston Division. July 13

In re Ryan, Lorraine A. et al.; Wozniak, Bill; Ventle, James; — Plaintiff(s); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Pointe Coupee, 18th Judicial Dis*504trict Court Div. A, Nos. 32,101, 32,497; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No(s). 2002 CA 2303, 2002 CA 2304. Denied.

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-20-00144-CV ___________________________ IN RE STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Relator Original Proceeding 153rd District Court of Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 153-306745

Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 23-0755 ══════════ In re State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Lindsey Nicole Dessart, Relators ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Writ of Mandamus ═══════════════════════════════════════ Argued October 3, 2024 JUSTICE DEVINE deliver

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED DNS AUTO GLASS SHOP, LLC A/A/O FRANCISCO HERNANDEZ, Appellant, Case No. 5D22-829 v. LT Case No. 2020-SC-005155 STATE FARM M

BYRNES, Judge. This appeal arises out of an automobile accident on December 6,1975, involving appellant, Ysidro Hernandez, and an automobile owned by appellee, Richard Kernell. The issue presented on appeal is whether or not Hernandez was covered by an insurance policy at the time of the accident. Suit was instituted by Hernandez, against State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, (hereinafter refered

Opinion by Judge TAUBMAN. Defendants, Jicky Hernandez Mendiola, as executrix of the estate of Gary Hernandez, and Gary’s children, April Hernandez and Kelly Hernandez, (the Hernandezes) appeal the judgment of the trial court that plaintiff, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm), was not liable for uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage under Colorado Law. We affirm.

LEBLANC, J. hln the instant appeal, defendant-appellant, State Farm Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”) seeks review of the trial court’s judgment in favor of plaintiff-appellee, Brandon Forvendel. For the foregoing reasons, we find that the trial court did not manifestly err in finding that Mr. Forvendel could recover under both his own and his mother’s uninsured motorist insurance policies. Acco

LEWIS, J., concurring in result. While I concur with the result reached in this case, I write separately because I believe this issue is also governed by an additional body of law other than that expressed by the majority. Every motor vehicle liability insurer in this State is statutorily mandated to offer uninsured motorist coverage unless the insured has expressly rejected the coverage. See §

MOSK, J. I dissent. By denying plaintiff the right to aggregate her uninsured motorist (UM) coverage, the majority have reached a harsh result. Plaintiff was injured by *470an uninsured motorist and her damages were in excess of $30,000. She was covered by two separate insurance policies with the same carrier,

826 F.Supp.2d 922 (2011) Boris ELTSEFON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., Defendant. Case No. 1:11cv991. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. November 16, 2011. *923 Andrei Jacob Kublan, Kublan & Austin PLC, Falls Church, VA, for Plaintiffs. Theodore Ira Br

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT MOTE WELLNESS & REHAB, INC., a/a/o FRED BIRKENFELD, Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. No. 4D21-440 [November 24, 2021] Appeal from the County Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County;