Cases

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-2497 MANUEL ANTONIO HERRERA HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THERESA LEE, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Cou

PER CURIAM. The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the judgment and sentence in case no. 10-CF-6805-0, in the Circuit Court in and for Orange County, Florida. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D). PETITION GRANTED. SAWAYA, TORPY and EVANDER, JJ„ concur.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1388 OPINION Plaintiff Francisco Herrera, by and through his guardian ad litem Gregorio Herrera, brought a personal injury action against defendant Ponciano Isabel Hernandez. The jury returned a verdict in favor of defendant. On appeal, plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in denying hi

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied. Same case below, 429 Fed. Appx. 382.

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical correct

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* O’BRIEN, Circuit Judge. After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Jose Herrera-Hernandez

MEMORANDUM** Luis Hernandez-Herrera appeals the judgment of conviction and 46-month sen*256tence, imposed pursuant to his guilty plea for illegal reentry after removal, with an enhancement for a prior aggravated felony conviction, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

537 U.S. 868 HERNANDEZ-HERRERAv.UNITED STATES. No. 01-10862. Supreme Court of United States. October 7, 2002. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. 2

Opinion by Judge RAWLINSON: Dissent by Judge POGUE. *1216RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge: Anthony Hernandez-Herrera (“Herrera”) appeals his conviction for being a deported alien “found in” the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Herrera also appeals pre-trial, jury selection, and evidentiary rulings, and the sentence imposed. Because the dist

Becker v. State COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ) HECTOR HERNANDEZ MARTINEZ,) No. 08-03-00181-CV ) Appellant,) Appeal from ) v.) County Court at Law No. 7

SALTER, J. Julio J. Martinez (“Martinez”) appeals a final judgment in favor of: the City of Hialeah (“City”); the City’s incumbent Mayor, Carlos Hernandez (“Hernandez”);, the City Clerk for the City of.Hialeah, Marbelys L. Rubio-Fatjo; and the Miami-Dade County Supervisor of Elections, Christina White. The legal issue raised by Martinez in his circuit

KELLY, Circuit Judge. Petitioners Lidia Cristina Hernandez-Martinez and Ismael Dominguez-Herrera, a married couple, appeal the denial of their consolidated applications for cancellation of removal under section 240A(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l). Because the petitioners have failed to meet their burden under the REAL ID Act to establish

706 S.E.2d 609 (2011) JONES v. LOPEZ-HERRERA. No. A10A1922. Court of Appeals of Georgia. February 24, 2011. Khadizeth Toure-Hernandez, Decatur, for appellant. Cruser & Mitchell, Craig P. Terrett, Norcross, for appellee. DILLARD, Judge. This appeal follows the dismissal of a complaint for failure to perfect service of process. For the reasons

NUMBER 13-99-143-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI ____________________________________________________________________ ALEX R. HERNANDEZ DOING BUSINESS AS HERNANDEZ BOND

TACHA, Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant Francisco Hernandez-Herrera appeals from a Judgment and Commitment Order following his conviction for violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a)(1) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1). On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court committed reversible error in admitting Government Ex *343

Appeal from Ct. Civ. App. Tex., 13th Sup. Jud. Dist., dismissed for want of substantial federal question.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION THELTON E. HENDERSON, District Judge. This matter came before the Court on May 2, 2011, on the motion for class certification filed by Plaintiff Mercedes Herrera (“Herrera” or “Plaintiff’). For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs motion is GRANTED. *671BACKGROUND

OPINION and ORDER GUSTAVO A. GELPÍ, United States' District Judge In this Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 (2004) antitrust case, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, asserting that the Sherman Act does not apply to Puerto Rico because it is not a State. (Docket No. 41.) In response, the Government argues that Puerto Rico is indeed a State for the purposes of the Sherman Act since Cór

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS