Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Herman Williams”
HERMAN WILLIAMS v. STATE OF FLORIDApublic domain
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT HERMAN WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D21-1907 [October 14, 2021] Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial C
HERMAN WILLIAMS v. STATE OF FLORIDApublic domain
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT HERMAN WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D18-1128 [April 22, 2020] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judici
Herman Williams v. Julie L. Jones, Secretary, etc.public domain
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA HERMAN WILLIAMS, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D15-1214 JULIE L. JONES, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Responde
Herman T. Williams v. State of Floridapublic domain
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT HERMAN WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D2025-1659 [September 3, 2025] Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial
the City of Granite Shoals v. Herman Williamspublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS, AT AUSTIN NO. 3-93-263-CV THE CITY OF GRANITE SHOALS, APPELLA
16 F.3d 414NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Herman WILLIAMS Petitioner-Appellant,v.Charles HILL; State of North Carolina, Respondents-Appellees. No. 93-6913. United
Williams v. Hermanpublic domain
129 F.Supp.2d 1281 (2001) Hazel WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. Alexis HERMAN, Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor, Defendant. No. CIV.S00693LKKDAD. United States District Court, E.D. California. January 11, 2001. Elaine W. Wallace, Oakland, CA, for plaintiff. *1282 Joseph Maloney, Assist. U.S. Atty., Sacramento, CA, for defendant
Herman v. Seaworld Parks & Entertainment, Inc.public domain
ORDER MARY S. SCRIVEN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE comes before the Court for consideration of the Motion for Class Certification (Dkt. 93) filed by Plaintiffs, Jason Herman, William Cohen, Joey Kratt, and Christina Lancaster, the Response in opposition thereto (Dkt. 99) filed by Defendant, SeaWorld Parks and Entertainment, Inc. (“SeaWorld”), and the Supplement (Dkt. 115) filed by Plaintiffs;
Williams, Herman v. City of Champaignpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 07-1619 DEBRA WILLIAMS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF CHAMPAIGN, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central Di
Herman Scott v. Lillie Scottpublic domain
LEE, C.J., CONCURRING IN RESULT ONLY: ¶ 17. I concur in result with the majority’s decision to affirm; however, I find that the chancellor’s decision to categorize a portion of the equitable division’ of the marital assets as lump-sum alimony was incorrect. ¶ 18. First, the chancellor did not provide for a specific amount of lump-sum alimony. Whether lump-sum alimony is “used either as
Herman v. Neely (In Re Herman)public domain
315 B.R. 381 (2004) In re Verna Kay HERMAN, Debtor. Verna Kay Herman, Plaintiff v. Johnny Milen Neely, Trustee and Gary Dean Jackson, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 02-64085. Adversary No. 03-6029. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Texas, Tyler Division. March 9, 2004. *383 Donald W. Cothern, Tyler, TX, for Plaintiff, Verna Ka
Williams v. Statepublic domain
DAVIS, Judge. Charles Herman Williams, Jr., challenges his conviction and five-year sentence for one count of felony battery, a lesser-included offense of the charge of aggravated battery. Because the trial court failed to instruct the jury on the justifiable use of nondeadly force as requested and because this error was not harmless, we reverse Williams’ judgment and sentence and remand for new trial. It
Bayfront Health Dade City v. Williamspublic domain
Affirmed.
People v. Hermanpublic domain
945 N.E.2d 54 (2011) THE PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John HERMAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1-08-0323. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Second Division. March 1, 2011. Rehearing Denied March 28, 2011. *55 Anita Alvarez, Cook County State's Attorney, James E. Fitzgerald, Mary
Herman v. Lincoln National Life Insurancepublic domain
Memorandum Opinion ALEXANDER WILLIAMS, JR., District Judge. Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion for Remand. See Doc. No. 12. This case was filed against Defendant Lincoln National Insurance Company (“Lincoln”) in the District Court of Maryland for Montgomery County on or about October 20, 2011. See Doc. No. 1 at 1. On November 22, 2011, Defendant removed the
Williams v. Herman Blutrichpublic domain
127 F.3d 38 Williamsv.Herman Blutrich** NO. 96-3452 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Sept 23, 1997 Appeal From: M.D.Fla. ,No.9500705CIVORL19 1 Affirmed.
Herman v. Admit Onepublic domain
Williams, RJ. However vigorously moral philosophers and others might debate the topic of the cost of admission to the Elysian Fields that is Fenway Park, whether by direct purchase from the Boston Red Sox or through “ticket scalpers,”1 this case addresses but one aspect of the “Anti-Scalping Statute,” G.Lc. 140, §185D.2 The defendant, Admit One Ticket Agency, LLC (“Admit O
Herman v. City of New Orleanspublic domain
DENNIS R. BAGNERIS, SR., Judge. 11 Plaintiffs/Appellants, Lengsfield Lofts Condominium Owners’ Association, Inc., Joshua Rubenstein, Russ Herman, and Sandra Herman, appeal the trial court’s denial of their request for a preliminary injunction.1 For the following reasons, we hereby affirm the judgment of the trial court. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On November
Wright v. Hermanpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION URBINA, District Judge. Granting the Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend and Supplement the Complaint; I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the court on the plaintiffs motion to amend and supplement her first amended complaint. Julia Wright (the “plaintiff’), brings this diversity suit against William Herman and Eric May (the “defendants”), seek
Herman v. Tracage Development, L.L.C.public domain
Judge Rosemary Ledet 11 This appeal involves a claim by a third party plaintiff—Tracage Development, L.L.C. (“Tracage”)—against a third party defendant—Joshua Rubenstein. From a judgment granting the third party defendant’s special motion to strike under La. C.C.P. art. 971 and peremptory exception of no cause of action, the third party plaintiff appeals. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the trial court’s judgment gran