Cases

324 F.Supp.2d 674 (2004) SPECIALTY INSURANCE, et al., v. ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY. Nos. CIV.A. 99-3689, CIV.A. 00-2482. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. July 9, 2004. *675 Kenneth T. Levine, Claudia D. McCarron, Nelson Levine Deluca & Horst, Blue Bell, PA, for Plaintiffs. Craig E. Parles, Herbert C. Klei

In an action to recover the value of a stolen vehicle under a policy of automobile insurance, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Henderson, J.), dated August 2, 1990, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs to the respondent Royal Insurance Company. In order to recover under a policy of insurance, the insured must sho

PER CURIAM. Darryl Allmond appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Allmond v. Royal Ins. Co. of America, No. CA-01-1468 (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 7, 2001; entered Dec. 11, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts an

508 F.2d 1103 Herbert MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.ROYAL NETHERLANDS STEAMSHIP COMPANY and West of EnglandShipowners Mutual Protection & Indemnity Association(Luxembourg), Defendants-Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants,Strachan Shipping Company, Third-Party-Defendant-Appelleeand American Mutual Liability Insurance Company, Intervenor-Appellee. No. 74-1237. United States Co

TANG, Circuit Judge: California Mortgage Exchange, California Mortgage Exchange of Southern California and the principal shareholder of both companies, Carlos Royal, appeal from a judgment entered against them after a jury trial. These defendants were found liable for violations of federal and state securities laws. The plaintiffs cross-appeal the jury’s finding that a director of one of the corporations, Max Hollis, was n

Pope, Judge. Workers’ compensation. On November 6, 1978 claimant Sandra Van Giller suffered an injury to her neck while in the employ of Claxton Manufacturing Company. The injury was compensable under the Workers’ Compensation Act, and claimant received compensation for temporary total disability and for medical expenses which arose as a result of the injury. These benefits were paid by the employer’s insurance carrier, Royal

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER, United States District Judge Pro se plaintiff Carrie Devorah has brought suit against her former investment advisor and associated defendants alleging various misdeeds related to her investment accounts. The defendants have moved to dismiss Devorah’s complaint, contending that

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs February 2, 2016 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. PRESTON RASHAD ROYAL Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. 1532 Donald H. Allen, Judge No. W2015-01334-CCA-R3-CD - Filed April 12, 2016 _____________________________ Defendant, Preston Rashad Royal, pled guilt

JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge: The issue in this case is whether it was error for the District Court, 318 F.Supp. 524, to grant Appellee Elrod’s motion to suppress certain evidence seized during a search of the hotel room occupied by both Elrod and Wright, on the grounds that (i) the Government failed to show that the consent to search g

On August 7, 1978, while operating a moped, the defendant was involved in an accident with an automobile. The moped was not insured. However, the defendant had a policy of insurance with the plaintiff covering his 1972 automobile.1 The policy was divided into two parts: compulsory and optional insurance. Under optional insurance, coverage was provided for medical payments (Part 6) and for bodily injury caused by an under-insured

LETTS, Judge. We reverse this cause on the authority of Whitten v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co., 410 So.2d 501 (Fla.1982) wherein our Supreme Court noted that entitlement to attorney’s fees under Section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1979) must spring from a “complete absence of a justiciable issue of either law or fact raised by the losing party.” (Id. 505) Here, we are not presented with a case involving

124 B.R. 200 (1991) In re William Herbert HUNT and Nancy Jane Broaddus Hunt, Debtors. In re Nelson Bunker HUNT and Caroline Lewis Hunt, Debtors. ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William Herbert HUNT and Nancy Jane Broaddus Hunt, Defendants-Appellees. BANKERS TRUST COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William Herbert HUNT and Nancy Jane Broaddus Hunt, Defendants-Appellees. BANKERS TRUST COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON December 9, 2015 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. SHAUN ROYAL HILL Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Tipton County No. 7697 Joe H. Walker, Judge No. W2015-00710-CCA-R3-CD - Filed June 9, 2016 A Tipton County jury convicted the Defendant, Shaun Royal Hill, of rape, and the trial

769 F.2d 1426 Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,280, 13 Collier Bankr.Cas.2d 1198,Bankr. L. Rep. P 70,718Herbert D. UNDERHILL, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Carlos ROYAL, et al., Defendants-Appellants.Herbert D. UNDERHILL, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.NATIONAL MORTGAGE EXCHANGE, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 84-6210, 84-6211. United States Court of Appeals,Nint

4 Mass. App. Ct. 597 (1976) 356 N.E.2d 257 VALDEMAR RAMALHETE vs. UNI-ROYAL, INCORPORATED. Appeals Court of Massachusetts, Hampden. September 20, 1976. October 18, 1976. Present: HALE, C.J., ARMSTRONG, & BROWN, JJ. Herbert Murphy for the plaintiff. Gerard L. Pellegrini for the defendant. HALE, C.J. <

100 Ill. App.3d 100 (1981) 426 N.E.2d 614 DORIS GRAMSE et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. ROYAL CREST ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs. — (CARDINAL ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants; RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner-Appellant.) No. 80-651. Illinois Appellate Court — Third District. Opinion fi

Opinion McDANIEL, J. The appeal here is from a money judgment based upon six specific jury awards, including both contract damages for breach of an insurance contract and tort damages for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The cross-appeal is from the trial court’s post-judgment order striking the award of punitive (exemplary) damages. The underlying action was broug

HOBSON, Acting Chief Judge. Paul and Pauline Johnson appeal the dismissal with prejudice of their action seeking declaratory judgment. We reverse. The Johnsons are assignees of a long-term lease on a mobile home park lot. An eight-foot wide mobile home was located on the lot when the Johnsons took possession and was included in the assignment of the lease. Appellee Royal Garden Estates,

The plaintiff brought an action in the Superior Court to recover a sum due under two guaranties, executed by the defendants, which secured loans made by the plaintiff to a corporation owned in part by the defendants. A Superior Court judge entered summary judgment for the plaintiff pursuant to Mass.R.Civ.P. 56, 365 Mass. 824 (1974), from which the defendants have appealed. There was no error. The defendants attempted to defeat the

986 F.Supp. 449 (1997) Mary Jane HARTSFIELD, Plaintiff, v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES OTIS ELEVATOR CO., INC., a New Jersey Corporation a/k/a Otis Elevator, a New Jersey Corporation, Defendant. No. CIV.A. 96-40115. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. December 12, 1997. *450 Leonard E. Miller, Frank R. Langton