⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Henry v. Morgan”

Henry v. Morganpublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019-03-19 · Published · cited 2× · 826 S.E.2d 475; 264 N.C. App. 363
INMAN, Judge. *364 When a plaintiff's attempts to find and serve a defendant do not meet the due diligence standard described by Rule 4(j1) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure, service of process by publication is improper and dismissal is appropriate. Plainti
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980-09-03 · Published · cited 0× · 636 F.2d 1201; 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 14363
636 F.2d 1201 Henryv.Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. 80-7223, 80-7281 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Second Circuit 9/3/80 1 S.D.N.Y. AFFIRMED
Morgan Cnty. v. Maypublic domain
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2019-02-18 · Published · cited 2× · 824 S.E.2d 365
NAHMIAS, Presiding Justice. *366Morgan County appeals the trial court's order dismissing Christine May's criminal citation for violating the County's amended zoning ordinance by renting out her house near Lake Oconee for a week. The court concluded that the zoning ordinance in effect at the time May began renting her house for short periods was
May v. Morgan Cnty.public domain
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017-10-20 · Published · cited 7× · 807 S.E.2d 28; 343 Ga. App. 255
Dillard, Chief Judge. *255In 2011, Morgan County issued a criminal citation to Christine May, alleging that she offered her Lake Oconee vacation home for short-term rentals in violation of a 2010 amendment to its zoning ordinances. The criminal prosecution was stayed for several years while May litigated a civil action against the County regard
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987-06-03 · Published · cited 690× · 818 F.2d 1433; 8 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 91; 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 6984; 56 U.S.L.W. 2012
CHOY, Senior Circuit Judge: This action was brought by appellant Howard Wool (“Wool”), on behalf of himself and a class of persons similarly situated, to recover damages for alleged fraud and *1435 breach of fiduciary duties in violation of, inter alia, federal securities laws and California comm
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019-02-05 · Published · cited 83× · 914 F.3d 1115
Sykes, Circuit Judge. *1117 Illinois prison officials issued a disciplinary report charging inmate Jeryme Morgan with offenses stemming from a violent assault on fellow prisoners. Morgan disputed the charges and asked the authorities to call a witness to testify at his Adjustment Committe
Morgan v. Colvinpublic domain
District Court, D. Colorado · 2014-09-18 · Published · cited 1× · 68 F. Supp. 3d 1351; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 131621; 2014 WL 4670928
ORDER REVERSING DISABILITY DECISION AND DIRECTING AWARD OF BENEFITS Blackburn, District Judge. The matter before me is plaintiffs Complaint [# l],1 filed March 27, 2013, seeking review of the Commissioner’s decision denying plaintiffs claim for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401, et seq. I have jurisdiction to r
Henry v. Statepublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013-10-11 · Published · cited 1× · 124 So. 3d 958; 2013 WL 5575565; 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16187
ORFINGER, J. Johnathan J. Henry appeals his conviction of burglary of an occupied dwelling. Henry argues that he was denied his constitutionally protected rights to a fair trial and access to the courts when, after electing self-representation, he was given no access to a law library, online legal research materials or some comparable legal resource. We affirm. The facts of the case are unnecessary for
Henry v. Mitchellpublic domain
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2013-06-06 · Published · cited 2× · 428 S.W.3d 454; 2013 Ark. 246; 2013 WL 2445190; 2013 Ark. LEXIS 280
DONALD L. CORBIN, Justice. | Appellants, Paul Henry and Crystal Henry, appeal the judgment of the Baxter County Circuit Court awarding damages to Appellee, Willard N. Mitchell, on his complaint against them for misrepresentation in the sale of real property. The circuit court held a bench trial and then entered judgment based on the finding that the Henrys had mistakenly misrepresented the boundaries
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016-05-10 · Published · cited 15× · 495 S.W.3d 468; 2016 WL 2743296; 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 4880
*472 OPINION Tracy Christopher, Justice In this appeal from a conviction for aggravated sexual assault, the sole question presented is whether the State violated appellant’s constitutional right to a speedy trial. The post-indictment delay was more than twenty years, and the vast majo
TIEU v. Morganpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011-11-02 · Published · cited 4× · 265 P.3d 98; 246 Or. App. 364; 2011 Ore. App. LEXIS 1488
265 P.3d 98 (2011) 246 Or. App. 364 Henry TIEU, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carl D. MORGAN and Francine A. Morgan, Defendants-Respondents. 081014035; A144733. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted July 26, 2011. Decided November 2, 2011. *100 David R. Nepom, Portland, argued the cau
Morgan v. Statepublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · 2012-04-12 · Published · cited 18× · 365 S.W.3d 706; 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 2881; 2012 WL 1227696
365 S.W.3d 706 (2012) Steven MORGAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 06-11-00080-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Texarkana. Submitted: April 2, 2012. Decided: April 12, 2012. *707 Craig L. Henry, Texarkana, for appellant. Kristian Young, Asst. Dist. Atty., Texarkana, for appellee. Bef
Dockery v. Morganpublic domain
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2011-03-03 · Published · cited 30× · 380 S.W.3d 377; 2011 Ark. 94; 2011 Ark. LEXIS 80
COURTNEY HUDSON HENRY, Justice. | iAppellant James Dockery appeals a Pulaski County Circuit Court order granting a motion to dismiss filed by appellees Brett Morgan, Craig Campbell, George Dunklin, Jr., Ronald Pierce, Rick Watkins, Ron Duncan, Emon Mahony, Dr. Frederick W. Spiegel, and Scott Henderson, individually and in their official capacities as commissioners and director of the Arkansas Game and F
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2007-09-24 · Published · cited 11× · 375 B.R. 838; 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 3152; 2007 WL 2752767
KRESSEL, Chief Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I join in the majority31 opinion with the exception of Part Cl, from which I dissent. As the majority indicates, there is no requirement of a request of a party in interest before the court can remove a trustee. I take that omission to be intentional and relevant. Numerous provisions of
Coffee v. Henrypublic domain
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010-01-26 · Published · cited 18× · 2010 OK 4; 240 P.3d 1056; 2010 Okla. LEXIS 5; 2010 WL 322563
240 P.3d 1056 (2010) 2010 OK 4 Glenn COFFEE, President Pro Tempore of the Oklahoma State Senate and Chris Benge, Speaker of the Oklahoma House of Representatives, Petitioners, v. Brad HENRY, Governor of the State of Oklahoma, Respondent. No. 106,839. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. January 26, 2010. Fred Morgan, Cheryl Ann Purvis, Staff Counsel, O
Morgan v. Turnerpublic domain
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2010-05-20 · Published · cited 22× · 368 S.W.3d 888; 2010 Ark. 245; 2010 Ark. LEXIS 282
RONALD L. SHEFFIELD, Justice. |We assumed jurisdiction of this case pursuant to our inherent authority under Rule 1 — 2(g) (2009) of the Rules of the Arkansas Supreme Court. Appellant, Henry Morgan, appeals from an order entered by the Clark County Circuit Court on February 10, 2009, dismissing Morgan’s complaint against Appellee, Todd Turner. Morgan now alleges several points of error. We find that t
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015-01-16 · Published · cited 18× · 458 S.W.3d 625
OPINION Evelyn V. Keyes, Justice A jury convicted appellant, Charles Henry Jones, of capital murder. 1 Because the State did not seek the death penalty, the trial court automatically assessed punishment at confinement for life. In two issues, appellant contends that (1) the State failed to present
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2016-08-23 · Published · cited 42× · 316 Mich. App. 726; 892 N.W.2d 442
Saad, J. I. NATURE OP THE CASE The narrow but consequential legal question posed by this appeal is whether defendants-appellants, Henry Ford Health System and Henry Ford Macomb Hospital Corporation (collectively, Henry Ford, the hospital, or defendants), are liable for defendant Dr. John J. Lim’s alleged malpractice in his treatment of plaintiff, Jamie Laster,
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2016-10-27 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-16-00070-CV Henry F. Coffeen III Management, § From the 96th District Court Inc., d/b/a Coffeen Management Company § of Tarrant County (096-283020-15) v. § October 27, 2016 Thomas Musgrave IV, Christina Morgan, and Richard W
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2016-10-27 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-16-00070-CV HENRY F. COFFEEN III APPELLANT MANAGEMENT, INC., D/B/A COFFEEN MANAGEMENT COMPANY V. THOMAS MUSGRAVE IV, APPELLEES CHRISTINA MORGAN, AND RICHARD W. DEWESE