Cases

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-2577 HENRY BEVERLY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES, an Illinois Corporation, and VICTORIA LUO, Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District

OWEN, Circuit Judge: This suit was filed in state court on behalf of children who suffered neurological damage allegedly caused by vaccines containing Thimerosal that in turn contained mercury. The case was removed to federal district court. That court denied the plaintiffs’ motion to remand and then dismissed all claims against all defendants, relying on the National Childhood

AMENDED MEMORANDUM *195AND ORDER1 SARIS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION New York City and forty-two New York counties have brought suit against numerous pharmaceutical manufacturers and subsidiaries alleging Medicaid fraud in violation of the federal Best Prices Statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1

MEMORANDUM BREDAR, United States Magistrate Judge. On October 19, 2000, this case was referred to the undersigned for resolution of all discovery disputes (Paper No. 21). Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Strike, or, in the Alternative, to Compel Plaintiff to Submit to a Mental Examination (Paper No. 35). I have considered the parties’ submissions. No hearing is necessary. See

CARL E. STEWART, Circuit Judge: In this products liability action, plaintiffs and Mississippi residents Mabel and Daryl McDonal (“the McDonals”) filed suit against various foreign and local defendants — the manufacturers and distributors of Thimerosal, the manufacturers of the vaccines which contained Thimerosal, the doctors who administered the vaccines, and River Oaks Hospital.

ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND HORNBY, District Judge. The plaintiffs’ motion to remand this putative class action removed from state court o'n diversity of citizenship is Granted because the $50,000 amount in controversy is not satisfied. The plaintiffs’ affidavits reveal that, considering the statute of limitations, their actual compensatory damages cannot be more than a couple of tho

892 F.Supp. 811 (1995) Jane DOE, v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES, et al. Civ. A. No. 94-2913. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. July 19, 1995. *812 Richard Lynn Ducote, David R. Fine, Fine & Associates, New Orleans, LA, Troy Gerard Broussard, Covington, LA, for plaintiff. Henry Bernis Alsobrook, Jr., Richard Anthony

AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge. Defendants, formerly manufacturers of DES for use in pregnancy have moved for summary judgment on the claims of plaintiff Lynn Yarnall. They contend that Yarnall’s claims are time-barred under the New York statute of limitations. Defendants’ motion is denied. Yarnall was born in New York in 19

895 F.Supp. 530 (1995) Ellen BRAUNE, Juli Ann Harnett, Elizabeth Rougny, and Kathryn Sullivan Lincoln, Plaintiffs, v. The ABBOTT LABORATORIES, Boyle & Co. Pharmaceuticals, Burroughs-Wellcome & Co., Inc., Carnrick Laboratories, Inc., Chase Chemical Co., Chromally American Corporation, Dart Industries, Inc., p/k/a Rexall Drug Co., Inc., Eli Lilly & Co., Kremers-Urban Co., n/k/a Mequon Co., Lincoln Laboratories, Inc., Mallincrodt Inc., M

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the Illinois Official Reports accuracy and integrity of this

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Personal Jurisdiction WEINSTEIN, District Judge: *557TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION.557 II. FACTS.558 A. Background.558 B. Present Actions.559 C. Motions.559 III. NEW YORK SUBSTANTIVE LAW AND RULES A

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WEINSTEIN, District Judge. Plaintiff Angela Silveri, who is allegedly suffering from adenocarcinoma, moves for permission to introduce proof to show that Eli Lilly and Co. (“Lilly”) is responsible for the defective design of DES. Sage v. Fairchild-Swearingen Corp., 70 N.Y.2d 579, 528 N.Y.S.2d 418, 517 N.E.2d 1304 (1987). In Sage, an airline employee was injured by a ladd

MILLS, District Judge. I. BACKGROUND Eric Wright was born on November 10, 1992, at Wesley Medical Center in Wichita, Kansas. Shortly after birth, his doctor prescribed intravenous treatments of un-concentrated sodium chloride because Wright suffered from low blood pressure. The hospital stocked its unconcentrated sodium chloride solutions in close proxim

920 F.Supp. 455 (1996) ORTHO DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant. No. 93 Civ. 2656(LAK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 18, 1996. As Corrected March 22, 1996. *456 *457 Robert M. Heller, Jonathan M. Wagner, Kramer, L

926 F.Supp. 371 (1996) ORTHO DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant. No. 93 Civ. 2656 (LAK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 26, 1996. Robert M. Heller, Jonathan M. Wagner, Kramer, Levin, Naftalis, Nessen, Kamin & Frankel, New York City, for Plaintiff. Jeffrey I. Weinberger, Steven M. Perry, Henry W

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN G. HEYBURN, II, District Judge. This is a products liability and negligence case in which Plaintiff, Kris Prather, alleges that a medical device, the Pain Control Infusion Pump (“PCIP”), manufactured by Defendant, B. Braun Medical, Inc., caused severe and permanent damage to her shoulder.1 The PCIP is a medical device prescribed to alleviate t

EDWARD J. DAVILA, United States District Judge In this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. § 1132, Plaintiff Olga Gorbacheva ("Plaintiff") seeks long-term disability ("LTD") payments from Defendant Abbott Laboratories Extended Disability Plan ("the Plan" or "Defenda

822 F.Supp. 145 (1993) ORTHO DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant. No. 93 Civ. 2656 (LBS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. May 28, 1993. *146 Kramer, Levin, Naftalis, Nessen, Kamin & Frankel, New York City, for plaintiff; Robert M. Heller, Harold P. Weinberger, Michael S. O

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge. Martina Beverly sued her former employer, Abbott Laboratories (Abbott), for employment discrimination and retaliation. During a private mediation, the parties signed a handwritten agreement stating that Beverly demanded $210,000 and mediation costs in exchange for dismissing the lawsuit. Abbott later accepted Beverly’s demand and circulated a more formal s

ORDER A sua sponte call for a vote on rehearing this case en banc was made by an active judge of this court. The call failed to receive a majority of the votes of the non-reeused active judges. Fed. R.App. P. 35. The sua sponte en banc call is rejected. O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge, joined by BYBEE and BEA, Circuit Judges, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc: This