⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Henrietta Sanders”

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco) · 2014-10-02 · Published · cited 3× · 475 S.W.3d 370; 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 10952; 2014 WL 4958631
OPINION TOM GRAY, Chief Justice. The Probate Code, now the Estates Code, provides a detailed procedure for the sale of an estate’s property by a dependent administrator or executor. That was done in this case. The administratrix of Henrietta Stone’s estate found one buyer for a portion of the Estate’s property, and after a delay, found another buyer for
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988-08-01 · Published · cited 0× · 296 S.C. 132; 370 S.E.2d 903; 1988 S.C. App. LEXIS 118
Littlejohn, Judge: Plaintiffs E. C. Sanders, Jr., Carl L. Meares, Jr. and W. D. Small, Appellants (Sellers) sued Defendant Coastal Capital Ventures, Inc., Respondent (Buyer) for damages alleging that the Buyer breached a written contract to purchase a parcel of real estate. Buyer answered, and counterclaimed for return of monies paid in advance toward the purchase price, alleging that Sellers could not deliver a marketable ti
Wynock v. Carrollpublic domain
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986-04-28 · Published · cited 1× · 345 S.E.2d 503; 289 S.C. 338; 1986 S.C. App. LEXIS 373
289 S.C. 338 (1986) 345 S.E.2d 503 Richard A. WYNOCK and Marie F. Wynock, Respondents v. M.N. CARROLL, Appellant. 0688 Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard March 17, 1986. Decided April 28, 1986. *339 George W. Cox, Jr. and G. Michael Smith, both of Myrtle Beach, for
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991-05-13 · Published · cited 10× · 404 S.E.2d 912; 304 S.C. 366; 1991 S.C. App. LEXIS 85
304 S.C. 366 (1991) 404 S.E.2d 912 FOXFIRE VILLAGE, INC., Respondent-Appellant v. BLACK & VEATCH, INC., Appellant-Respondent. 1662 Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard January 21, 1991. Decided May 13, 1991. Rehearing Denied June 19, 1991. *367
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989-02-06 · Published · cited 0× · 298 S.C. 552; 382 S.E.2d 1; 1989 S.C. App. LEXIS 89
Gardner, Judge: Unlimited Services, Inc., (Unlimited), which operated a restaurant called the “Bullshipper,” sued Macklen Enterprises, Inc., and Melton Macklen (Macklen) for, inter alia, fraud and deceit and conversion of deposit money. Upon trial, the jury returned a verdict for Unlimited in the amount of $254,542.04, of which $20,000.00 was for the conversion cause of action, which was set aside by the trial judge.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986-05-19 · Published · cited 15× · 344 S.E.2d 869; 289 S.C. 89; 1986 S.C. App. LEXIS 362
289 S.C. 89 (1986) 344 S.E.2d 869 Juanita B. KINCAID and Beverly K. Davidson, a/k/a Beverly K. McLeod, Respondents v. The LANDING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Resort Management Group, Inc., and Resort Construction Corporation, Appellants. 0718 Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard April 16, 1986. Decided May 19, 1986.
Marr v. Tesauropublic domain
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984-10-24 · Published · cited 0× · 283 S.C. 333; 322 S.E.2d 685; 1984 S.C. App. LEXIS 591
Cureton, Judge: This is an appeal of an order denying appellant Tesauro’s motion to file an answer or otherwise plead to Marr’s complaint. We affirm. The facts are basically undisputed. Tesauro is a resident of Pennsylvania and a director of Respro Corporation. Marr’s complaint alleges that Tesauro and another director of Res-pro conspired to induce him to invest $10,000 in the corporation by falsely repr
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986-04-02 · Published · cited 9× · 631 F. Supp. 1393; 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27274
631 F.Supp. 1393 (1986) EASTERN ILLINOIS TRUST & SAVINGS BANK, a State Bank Chartered Under the Laws of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff, v. James C. SANDERS, Administrator of the Small Business Administration, et al., Defendants. No. 84 C 4579. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. April 2, 1986. Jeffrey D. Colman and Norman M. Hirsch, Jenner &
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1914-12-09 · Published · cited 1× · 112 Me. 433; 92 A. 488; 1914 Me. LEXIS 142
Philbrook, J. This is an action to recover rent for use and occupation of certain real estate which began under a lease and continued by virtue of a provision in the lease for option of renewing the same for a term of three years from the expiration of the lease term. The occupancy and the non-payment of the rental sued for are both admitted by the defendant, but he claims that he should be allowed an offset for outside repairs
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984-03-05 · Published · cited 2× · 315 S.E.2d 127; 281 S.C. 249; 1984 S.C. App. LEXIS 426
281 S.C. 249 (1984) 315 S.E.2d 127 Grady E. McMEHAN, James W. Hancock, Jr., Mitchell K. Byrd, James W. Boyd, Henrietta Gill, Charles B. Burnette, James F. Wells, and Thomas A. Givens, Appellants, v. YORK COUNTY COUNCIL OF the COUNTY OF YORK, State of South Carolina, and Caldwell A. Barron, E.C. Black, Sidney C. Moore, Jr., Dewey E. Neal, Murray A. White, Jr., and John J. Williams, Chairman of the York County Council, as me
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014-04-08 · Published · cited 107× · 748 F.3d 471; 29 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 980; 2014 WL 1362367; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 6466
PER CURIAM: Chester Widomski appeals from the District Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee the State University of New York (SUNY) at Orange, also known as Orange County Community College (“OCCC”), on his claims of discrimination on the basis of a “perceived disability” and retaliation in violation of Title II of the Americans "with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014-04-08 · Published · cited 0×
13‐1367‐cv Widomski v. State Univ. of N.Y. (SUNY) at Orange, AKA Orange Cnty. Cmty. Coll. 13‐1367‐cv Widomski v. State Univ. of N.Y. (SUNY) at Orange, AKA Orange Cnty. Cmty. Coll. In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2013 No. 13‐1367‐cv C
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2021-06-02 · Published · cited 0×
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Charleston Development Company, LLC, Charleston Housing Company, LLC and NotSo Hostel, LLC, Appellants, v. Younesse Alami, Simon M. Adell, Matthew Anderson, Matthew Asher, Daniel Baker, Marie Baker, Matthew and Christina Bare, Andre Bauer, Peter Bierce, Brandon Blount, Barbara Brass, Richard T. Brewer, Sigrid Anne Eilertson, Reginald P. Brown, IV, Mary Cahill, Ryan Cockrell, Kevin and Virginia Conlon, Anne Marie Crevar, Chr
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007-01-22 · Published · cited 12× · 477 F.3d 616; 67 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 235; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 1327
477 F.3d 616 FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK, as Trustee of the Southeast Timber Leasing Statutory Trust, Appellant,v.PICTET OVERSEAS TRUST CORP., LTD., Trustee of Henrietta Y. Jones Trust, Appellee. No. 05-2932. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: September 25, 2006. Filed: January 22, 2007.
Sanders v. Crabtreepublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 1941-05-01 · Published · cited 2× · 44 Cal. App. 2d 602; 112 P.2d 923; 1941 Cal. App. LEXIS 1036
44 Cal.App.2d 602 (1941) ERNEST SANDERS et al., as Executors, etc., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. EFFIE BRUTON CRABTREE et al., as Executrices, etc., Respondents; MARGARET G. SANDERS, as Administratrix, etc., Intervener and Appellant. Civ. No. 11311. California Court of Appeals. First Dist., Div. One. May 1, 1941. Tanner, Odell & Taft and S.W. Odell for Appe
District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019-02-12 · Published · cited 27× · 367 F. Supp. 3d 39
KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, United States District Judge *46The instant matter concerns allegations of discrimination and constitutional violations that have been brought by a legally blind inmate to redress incidents that occurred while he was detained at the Rikers Island correctional facility in 2017. Defendants have responded with a motion to dismiss, arguing procedural and
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007-01-22 · Published · cited 76× · 477 F.3d 616
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. This case is once again before us. In our prior ruling, we reversed and remanded for further proceedings. First Union Natl Bank v. Pictet Overseas Trust Corp., Ltd., 351 F.3d 810, 816 (8th Cir.2003) (Pic-tet I) (hereinafter we refer to the parties as First Union and Pictet). On remand, the district court entered summa
State v. Georgepublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014-05-22 · Published · cited 1× · 2014 Ohio 2177
[Cite as State v. George, 2014-Ohio-2177.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 100113 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs.
Pressley v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001-09-24 · Published · cited 1× · 155 A.2d 494; 220 Md. 558
Hammond, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. Pressley, the appellant, and one Vass were indicted jointly for larceny and receiving stolen goods. At arraignment both pleaded not guilty. Each told the judge, when advised of his right to counsel, that he did not intend to retain a lawyer. The judge appointed counsel for Vass but told Pressley that he was old eno
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1987-06-17 · Published · cited 0× · 510 So. 2d 264; 40 Educ. L. Rep. 1349; 1987 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 1319
This case involves a pay raise dispute between the Greene County Board of Education and various teachers and staff personnel. In 1984 the Alabama legislature enacted a statute which granted a fifteen percent cost-of-living increase to various school personnel. Among the school personnel to whom the increase was granted were various kindergarten teachers, fulltime kindergarten support personnel, and bus drivers. The Greene County Board of Education (hereinafter the Board)