Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Henneman v. Johnson”
HENNEMAN-TODMAN v. JOHNSONpublic domain
For Publication IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS ALANI HENNEMAN-TODMAN ) S. Ct. Civ. No. 2022-0038 Appellant/Plaintiff, ) Re: Super. Ct. Civ. No. 583/2019 (STT) ) V ) ) SHERYL O’BRYAN-JOHNSON, TRUSTEE, ) ELSA D.
Claim of Henneman v. Endicott Johnson Corp.public domain
The self-insured employer appeals from an award for reduced earnings at the rate of $9.31 per week from December 15, 1954 to December 7, 1955 on the grounds that there was no substantial evidence for the finding that claimant had causally related disability preventing him from doing his regular work after March 25, 1953 and further that for the period of the award, as a matter of fact and law, there was no loss of earnings. Claimant was employed as a crane
10 Wis.2d 260 (1960) FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHIPPEWA FALLS, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CHARLES HENNEMAN COMPANY, Defendant: JOHNSON and wife, Defendants and Respondents: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant and Respondent: CHIPPEWA COUNTY, Defendant and Appellant. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. April 4, 1960. May 3, 1960. *263
People v. Hennemanpublic domain
Mr. Justice Snyder delivered the opinion of the Court. The People filed an information in this Court in the nature of quo warranto against Eastern Sugar Associates and several lessors of land to Eastern. It álleged that Eastern owned and controlled more than 500 acres of land in violation of certain insular and Federal statutes. The trustees of Eastern petitioned us for removal of the cause to the United States
Pueblo v. Hennemanpublic domain
El Juez Asociado Señor SNYder emitió la opinión del tribunal. El Pueblo de Puerto Eico radicó ante este Tribunal una querella de quo warranto contra la Eastern Sugar Associates y varios arrendadores de terrenos a la Eastern. Alegaba la querella que la Eastern era dueña y controlaba más de 500 acres de tierra en violación de ciertas leyes insulares y federal. Los síndicos de la Eastern solicitaron de
Pueblo v. Hennemanpublic domain
El Juez Asociado Señoe SnydeR emitió la opinión del tribunal. Esta es una petición para que se traslade una querella de la naturaleza de quo warranto de esta corte a la Corte de Distrito de los Estados Unidos, para Puerto Rico. La querella alega dominio y control de tierras en violación de ciertas leyes insulares y federales. A petición de los allí demandados, un procedimiento similar al presente caso
People v. Hennemanpublic domain
Mr. Justice Hebel delivered the opinion of the court. In an indictment returned by the grand jury to the criminal court of Cook county it was charged in Count I that George Henneman on September 17, 1942 and prior thereto conspired with divers persons whose names were unknown, with malicious intent to unlawfully, wrongfully, wilfully, and mischievously injure th
People v. Hennemanpublic domain
MR. Justice Snyder delivered the opinion of the court. This is a petition for removal of an information in the nature of quo warranto from this court to the District Court of the United States for Puerto Rico. The information alleges ownership and control of land in violation of certain insular and federal statutes. On petition of defendants therein, a proceeding similar to the instant case was removed
Johnson v. Hansonpublic domain
Forbes Hanson, individually and as next friend of his minor son, brought suit in April of 1977 against C. R. Johnson to recover $2,500 in claimed damages growing out of an automobile collision. After Johnson failed to answer or make other appearance, the trial court "rendered and entered" a default judgment on May 4, 1977, awarding plaintiffs damages in the sum of $1,200. Three months later, on August 4, 1977, the trial court entered a judgment Nunc pro tunc, purportedly to cor
For Publication IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS REYNITA CLARK; ALEXANDER ) S. Ct. Civ. No. 2023-0107 WILLIAMS; TIFFAN MAPP; ROBERT ) Re: Super. Ct. Civ. No. 0305/2020 (STT) NESBITT; and IEASHA DASHIELL SMITH, ) Appellants/Plaintiffs, ) ) v. )
Ayotte v. Boeing Co.public domain
Chief Judge Rubén Castillo *1070Daniel L. Ayotte ("Plaintiff") filed this action in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, alleging claims against a host of defendants, including The Boeing Company ("Boeing"), arising from his exposure to asbestos. (R. 1-1, Compl.) Boeing removed the action to this Court. (R. 1, Notice of Removal.) Before the Court is Plaintiff'
Cales v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING HALLIBURTON’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ALAN B. JOHNSON, District Judge. After a handrail on a piece of Halliburton Energy Services’s equipment collapsed on and pinned Dennis Sabe, Kevin Cales managed to lift it off but tore some cartilage in his ribs and slipped a disc in his back in the process. Seeking to recover for those injuries, Kevin and Ann Cales brought negligence an
State v. Erik Virgil Hallpublic domain
HORTON, J., dissenting. I join in the Court's decision to affirm Hall's convictions for first-degree murder, first-degree kidnapping and rape, although I have a slightly different view on two guilt phase issues that I will briefly discuss. Although I agree with much of the Court's discussion regarding the penalty phase and post-conviction relief proceedings, I respectfully dissent from the Court's decision to affirm the death pen
[Cite as 12312 Mayfield Rd., L.L.C. v. High & Low Little Italy, L.L.C., 2024-Ohio-2717.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA 12312 MAYFIELD ROAD, LLC, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 113549 v.
Hightower Holding, LLC v. John Gibsonpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE HIGHTOWER HOLDING, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2022-0086-LWW ) JOHN GIBSON, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION
Mari Davies, V. Multicare Health Systempublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON MARI YVONNE DAVIES, No. 80854-1-I Appellant, DIVISION ONE v. MULTICARE HEALTH SYSTEM, a PUBLISHED OPINION Washington corporation d/b/a GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL, and MT. RAINIER EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS, PLLC; MICHAEL HIRSIG, M.D., Respondents. MANN, C.J. —
Rich v. Fox News Network, LLCpublic domain
GEORGE B. DANIELS, United States District Judge: Plaintiffs Joel and Mary Rich bring this action against Defendants Fox News Network, LLC, Fox News reporter Malia Zimmerman (together with Fox News, the "Fox Defendants"), and Fox News contributor Ed Butowsky asserting claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress ("IIED") and for aiding and abetting and conspiring to intentionally inflict emotional distress on Plaintiffs. (
Tony Evers v. Howard Markleinpublic domain
2025 WI 36 TONY EVERS, et al., Petitioners, v. HOWARD MARKLEIN, et al., Respondents. No. 2023AP2020-OA Decided July 8, 2025 ORIGINAL ACTION KAROFSKY, C.J., delivered the majority opinion of the Court, in which ANN WALSH BR
Hall v. Statepublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 47871 ERICK VIRGIL HALL, ) ) Petitioner-Appellant, ) Boise, May 2022 Term ) v. ) Opinion Filed: March 22, 2023
Simon v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
GERARD E. LYNCH, Circuit Judge: This case requires us to consider whether detaining an individual pursuant to a material arrest warrant is a prosecutorial function entitled to absolute immunity. We hold that it is not. As the record is insufficient to determine whether defendants are entitled to qualified immunity, we vacate the judgment of the United States District Court for the