Cases

624 So.2d 107 (1993) OPINION OF THE JUSTICES. No. 338. Supreme Court of Alabama. April 27, 1993. Members of the Senate Alabama State House Montgomery, Alabama 36130 Dear Senators: We have received Senate Resolution 97, which requests our opinion as to whether the finding in Section One of Senate Bill 607 ("S. 607") (the finding that the Legislatu

903 F.Supp. 532 (1995) The STATE OF NEW YORK, by Attorney General Dennis C. VACCO, et al., Plaintiff, v. REEBOK INTERNATIONAL LTD., et al., Defendants. No. 95 Civ. 3143 (JGK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. October 20, 1995. Pamela Jones Harbour, Joseph Opper, Linda J. Gargiulo, Assistant Attorneys General, New York City, for State of New York and loca

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MONTANA WILDLIFE No. 20-35609 FEDERATION; THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY; NATIONAL AUDUBON D.C. No. SOCIETY; NATIONAL WILDLIFE 4:18-cv-00069- FEDERATION; MONTANA BMM AUDUBON, Plaintiffs-Appellees, OPINION v. DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior; DONATO JUDICE, in hi

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER BABCOCK, Chief Judge. This is a Miller Act action. See 40 U.S.C. §§ 3131(a)-(d). A trial to the Court *1059was held February 23, 2004 through February 26, 2004. Plaintiff Johnson Pugh Mechanical, Inc. (“Johnson Pugh,” or “JP”) demands payment of $1,158,239.99 plus interest based on paym

148 P.3d 842 (2006) 2006 OK 34 JACOBS RANCH, L.L.C., an Oklahoma limited liability company, Roos Ranch, Inc., an Oklahoma corporation, and Roos Resources, Inc., an Oklahoma corporation, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Duane A. SMITH, as Executive Director, and the Oklahoma Water Resources Board, an agency of the State Of Oklahoma, Defendants/Appellees, and Arbuckle Master Conservancy District, the City of Ardmore, The City o

(2008) Daniel SARANCHAK, Petitioner v. Jeffrey BEARD, Commissioner, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections; David DiGuglielmo, Superintendent of the State Correctional Institution at Graterford; and Frank Tennis, Superintendent of the State Correctional Institution at Rockview, Respondents. Civil No. 1:CV-05-0317. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. January 4, 2008

792 P.2d 196 (1990) Patricia A. BROOKS and First Interstate Bank, N.A., Casper, Co-Trustees of the Brooks Marital Trust, Appellants (Plaintiffs), v. John A. ZEBRE, d/b/a John A. Zebre, P.C., a Wyoming Corporation, Appellee (Defendant). No. 88-263. Supreme Court of Wyoming. May 17, 1990. *197 Wesley A. Roberts and Donald P. White

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARGDA PIERRE-NOEL, on behalf of her minor child K.N., Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:23-cv-00070 (TNM) BRIDGES PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION This case is about who must ensure that a disabled ch

54 F.3d 779NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpublished orders shall not be cited or used as precedent except to support a claim of res judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case in any federal court within the circuit. Thomas R. SALZER, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Frederick DELLINGER, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-3475. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit

318 F.Supp.2d 1057 (2004) THE UNITED STATES of America for the Use and Benefit of JOHNSON PUGH MECHANICAL, INC., Plaintiff, v. LANDMARK CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION and The Mountbatten Surety Co., Inc., Defendants, Doug Pourier, William Clary, Kathleen Clary, and PI Construction Corporation, Third-party Defendants. No. CIV.01-B-2406(BNB). United States District Court, D. Colorado.

MEMORANDUM, ORDER, & JUDGMENT JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge. Table of Contents I. Introduction..............................................................168 II. Facts........................ 170 A. Procedural History....................................................170 B. Evidence on Poker..................

The opinion of the Court was delivered by STEIN, J. Since 1961, when the United States Supreme Court decided Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 81 S.Ct. 1684, 6 L.Ed.2d 1081, New Jersey and her sister states have been compelled by the federal constitution to exclude from the State’s case-in-ehief evidence obtained in violation of the fourth amendment. The so-called “exclusionary

660 S.W.2d 683 (1983) Chaiyarat SERMCHIEF, et al., Appellants, v. Mario GONZALES, et al., Respondents, and State of Missouri, Intervenor-Respondent. No. 64692. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. November 22, 1983. Frank Susman, Roselee Adlin, Stephen G. Hamilton, Susan Schermer, St. Louis, for appellants. Michael Wolff, St. Louis, Richard S. Brownlee, II

HARSHBARGER, Justice: After Mark Harper, of South Charleston, was arrested and incarcerated for public intoxication more than a dozen times in 1980, he petitioned by habeas corpus to test the constitutionality of jailing chronic alcoholics who are intoxicated in public.1 I. Medical experts and professional groups have concluded that alcoholism is a disease.

ACCEPTED 03-15-00293-CV 8312780 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

634 F.Supp. 1048 (1986) Glenn T. SANDERS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. ROBINSON HUMPHREY/AMERICAN EXPRESS, INC., et al., Defendants. Tommy E. PARKER, as custodian for Kimberly M. PARKER, and James L. Smith, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. PAINE WEBBER GROUP, INC., Defendant. Suzanne KIRKPATRICK, Dorothy D. Casler and Charles H. Lindsey, Plaintiffs,

500 F.Supp. 1207 (1980) Frank MARRAPESE v. STATE OF RHODE ISLAND et al. Civ. A. No. 80-0167. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island. October 10, 1980. *1208 John F. Cicilline, Providence, R. I., for plaintiff. Eileen G. Cooney, Asst. Atty. Gen., Providence, R. I., for defendants. OPINION AND ORDER

Mr. Justice Powell delivered the opinion of the Court. The Compact Clause of Art. I, § 10, cl. 3, of the Constitution provides: “No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, . . . enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power . . . .” The Multistate Tax Compact, which established the Multistate Tax Commission, has not received congressional approval. This appeal requires u

ACCEPTED 04-15-00469-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/3

400 U.S. 112 (1970) OREGON v. MITCHELL, ATTORNEY GENERAL. No. 43, Orig. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 19, 1970 Decided December 21, 1970[*] ON BILL OF COMPLAINT. *115 Lee Johnson, Attorney General of Oregon, argued the cause for plaintiff in No. 43, Orig. With him on the briefs