Cases

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ROSENSTENGEL, District Judge: Pending before the Court is a motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant Phillips 66 Company (“Phillips 66” or “the Company”) on May 6, 2014 (Doc. 59). Also pending is a motion filed by Phillips 66 on June 12, 2014, in which Phillips 66 seeks to strike various exhibits submitted by Plaintiff Nathan Williams as part of his response to the motio

731 F.2d 465 34 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 649,33 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,252, 17 Ed. Law Rep. 13 Mary CRAIK, Julie Andrzejewski, Joan Hemmer, and JuneGoemer, Appellants,v.The MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY BOARD; St. Cloud StateUniversity; Garry Hays; Charles J. Graham; Lowell R.Gillett; Kenneth A. Ames; Frank G. Chesley; Arnold C.Anderson; Howard B. Casmey; Thomas P. Coughlon; Robert W.Ir

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 19, 2022 Decided April 27, 2023 No. 21-7078 STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL., APPELLANTS v. META PLATFORMS, INC., APPELLEE Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:2

PHIPPS, Presiding Judge. This appeal from two summary judgment orders is the third appearance of this case before this court. 1 In American Management I, the court stated the facts as follows. Appellees Fort Benning Family Communities, LLC (“FBFC”) and Fort Belvoir Res

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 21-1832 _____________ MADISON M. LARA; SOPHIA KNEPLEY; LOGAN D. MILLER; SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC.; FIREARMS POLICY COALITION, Appellants v. COMMISSIONER PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE __________ On Appeal from th

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 600 U. S. Part 1 Pages 1–65 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 27, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are reque

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-50048 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:20-cr- 00387-AB-1 v. STEVEN DUARTE, AKA Shorty, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California André Birotte

MEMORANDUM, ORDER, AND JUDGMENT JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge: Table of Contents I. Introduction. .439 II. Ripeness_ .440 TTT TTsr-t.s .440 i i ' A. The Bathtub: People’s Exhibit 11. ^ 4^ I — 1 B. The Bathtub: People’s Exhibit. 12. ^ fO C. The Bathtub: People’s Exhibit 13. ^ w D. Admis

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-2005 STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC., Plaintiff, Appellant, v. PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE, Defendant, Appellee. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Allison D. Burroughs, U.S. Distric

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON PAMELA A. GORDON and ) SAMMY D. GORDON, ) ) Plaintiffs/Appellants, ) Madison Circuit No. 59360-4 T.D. ) VS. ) Appeal No. 02A01-9611-CV-00282 ) DR. DONALD WILSON, M.D., and THE JACKSON CLINIC PROFESS

JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge: The Director of the Minerals Management Service (MMS) division of the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) ordered Mesa Operating Limited Partnership (Mesa), which extracts natural gas from offshore leases, to pay royalties on reimbursement payments made to Mesa by pipeline company purchasers pursuant to the Natural Gas Policy Act (NGPA) § 110. <

ACCEPTED 12-14-00254-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 3/9/2015 9:13

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WILLIAMS. STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge: On August 16, 1995 the Interstate Commerce Commission approved the merger of Burlington Northern, Inc. (“BN”) and The Atchinson, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company (“Santa Fe”), two railways that serve the West with about 35,000 miles of track. Burlingto

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ALLEN SHARP, Chief Judge. I. This case is before the court on the defendant’s, Fort Wayne Education Association, Inc. (FWEA), Motion to Dismiss or Abstain filed on July 14, 1986. The motion sought dismissal pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the federal Rules of Civil Procedure or, in the alternative, a stay of proceedings in this case pending resolution of the issues in

SWYGERT, Senior Circuit Judge, dissenting. I agree with the majority’s conclusion that the opinion of the magistrate, who tried the case below by consent, seriously fails to consider much of the extensive and sophisticated statistical evidence presented at trial, and partly fails to evaluate the various kinds of evidence, statistical and non-statistical, in the proper framework. I also agree, for the most part,

50 Cal.3d 468 (1990) 788 P.2d 640 268 Cal. Rptr. 126 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. FRED BERRE DOUGLAS, Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. S004666. Crim. No. 24475. Supreme Court of California. April 2, 1990. *485 COUNSEL Amitai Schwartz, under appointment by the S

59 N.W.2d 776 (1953) ROBINSON v. HOME FIRE & MARINE INS. CO. No. 48284. Supreme Court of Iowa. July 17, 1953. *778 W. Lawrence Oliver, Des Moines, for appellant. Herrick & Langdon, Des Moines, for appellee. GARFIELD, Justice. This is a law action for damages for two separate defamatory statements. Bot

This is a suit by Daisy Kirby Sullivan (appellee) against Florence Coca Cola Bottling Company (appellant) for injuries allegedly suffered by her on September 3, 1949, by glass from an explosion of an unopened bottle or bottles of Cola Cola which she was carrying in her hand in a six bottle paste board coca cola carton. The alleged explosion took place as she walked home from the grocery store known as Watson's Grocery Store, where the coca colas in question had been purchased by her.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE MDL Dkt. No. 1869 ANTITRUST LITIGATION (NO. I) Miscellaneous No. 07-489 (MDL I) Judge Beryl A. Howell IN RE RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION (NO. II)

215 Or. 331 (1959) 335 P.2d 379 WIEBE v. SEELY, ADMINISTRATOR WIEBE v. PIASECKI Supreme Court of Oregon. Argued March 11, 1958. Reversed and remanded February 11, 1959. *336 William H. Morrison, Portland, argued the cause for appellants and cross-respondent. On the briefs were Maguire, S