Cases

ROBERTA. CHAISSON, Judge. Lin this insurance coverage dispute, plaintiffs, William and lone Power, appeal from a judgment of the trial court in favor of defendant/insurer, State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (“State Farm”). The trial court based this judgment on its determination that the water damage to the Powers’ home resulted from a continuous or repeated seepage or leakage of water and therefore was not a covered loss

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) CAPITOL SPECIALITY ) INSURANCE CORPORATION ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 10-2079 (ESH)

793 F.Supp.2d 399 (2011) CAPITOL SPECIALITY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. SANFORD WITTELS & HEISLER, LLP, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 10-2079 (ESH). United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 27, 2011. *401 Marc Evan Rindner, Richard Albert Simpson, Wiley Rein, LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff.

MEMORANDUM OPINION REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge The plaintiffs, Burk & Reedy, LLP and James Burk, filed this civil action in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia *3 (“Superior Court”) against the defendant, American Guarantee an

HAMILTON, Circuit Judge. Defendant-appellant Safety National Casualty Corporation (“Safety National”) sold an excess liability insurance coverage policy to plaintiff-appellee TKK USA, Inc., which was formerly known as The Thermos Company. The policy covered excess losses resulting from liability imposed on TKK “by the Workers’ Compensation or Employers’ Liability Laws” of Illinois. The central issue in these appeals is wheth

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Nos. 12‐1988 and 12‐2091 TKK USA, INC., formerly known as THE THERMOS COMPANY, Plaintiff‐Appellee, Cross‐Appellant, v. SAFETY NATIONAL CASUALTY CORP., Defendant‐Appellant, Cross‐Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern Distric

MEMORANDUM OPINION Emmet G. Sullivan, United States District Judge Plaintiff Jonathan Silver brings this action against his former insurer, American Safety Indemnity Company (“American Safety”). Plaintiff alleges that American Safety breached the insurance policy it issued him when it refused to provide coverage for his legal expenses arising o

MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge 1426 Wisconsin, L.L.C., seeks to recover costs and lost income under its Travelers insurance policy. But 1426 Wisconsin’s claim appears time-barred by a two-year contractual limitations period included in the policy. Because this Court agrees that Travelers engaged in' no behavio

MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY United States District Judge. Plaintiff The Cincinnati Insurance Company filed suit against Defendants All Plumbing, Inc. Service, Parts, Installation (“All Plumbing”), Mr. Kabir Shafik (“Shafik”), 1 and FDS Restaurant, Inc., seeking a declaratory judgme

JUSTICE BAKER delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Kirk White appeals a judgment entered by the Montana Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Gallatin County, dismissing his complaint on the merits and ordering that judgment be entered in favor of the Montana State Fund. We affirm. ¶2 We consider the following issues on appeal:

554 So.2d 522 (1989) Terri J. GANSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE OF STATE EMPLOYEES' INSURANCE, Appellee. No. 88-1568. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. December 22, 1989. Rehearing Denied January 26, 1990. *523 Kenneth D. Kranz, of Eric B. Tilton, P.A.

1 Reported in 112 P.2d 522. This court, in the case of State v. Inland Empire Refineries,Inc., 3 Wn.2d 651, 101 P.2d 975, held unconstitutional in its entirety chapter 186, Laws of 1939, p. 581 (Rem. Rev. Stat. (Sup.), § 8370-78a [P.C. § 7029k-21] et seq.), which levied an excise

[1] This is an original proceeding instituted in this court upon an order to show cause procured by the relator in behalf of himself and all others similarly situated seeking to determine the constitutionality of chapter 184, Laws 1933, commonly spoken of as the Gross Income Tax Law. At the outset defendants, while conceding that this court has jurisdiction if it sees fit to exercise the same, urge nevertheless that this court should in its discretion refuse to entertain the matter and dismis

STEPHEN J. WINDHORST, Judge. |Jn this suit for damages, plaintiff Shone Bush, appeals from the trial court’s judgment allocating fault and awarding damages. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. ' On April, 3, 2010, Mr. Bush was a guest passenger in a red Camaro driven by Todd Williams. Todd Williams drove to the parking lot of a McDonald’s Restaurant in Marrero, Louisiana.’ As Todd Williams was p

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-2386 ___________________________ First Baptist Church Plaintiff - Appellant v. Zurich American Insurance Company

MAX N. TOBIAS, JR., Judge. _JjOn 31 October 2008, the plaintiff/appellant, Stephen B. Murray, [Sr.] d/b/a the Murray Law Firm (“Murray” or “Murray, Sr”), filed suit against the defendants/appellees, Linda S. Harang (“Harang”) and the Law Offices of Linda S. Harang, L.L.C.1 for breach of a written joint venture agreement to represent clients in connection with property and other damages resulting fr

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY KENNETH & CLASINA DREISBACH ) ) Plaintiffs ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N12C-09-121 MJB ) ROBERT T. & ) MARTINA L. WALTON ) ) Defendants ) Submitted: M

Opinion WERDEGAR, J. Plaintiff Timothy Sandquist and the various defendants here are parties to an arbitration agreement. A salient question is whether that agreement permits or prohibits arbitration on a classwide basis. Here we must answer a question one step removed—who decides whether the agreement permits or prohibits classwide arbitration, a court or the arbitrator? The question has divided the m

798 F.Supp.2d 1165 (2011) Genine CANNATA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WYNDHAM WORLDWIDE CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. No. 2:10-CV-00068-PMP-LRL. United States District Court, D. Nevada. July 21, 2011. *1167 Edward Chapin, Jill Sullivan, Chapin Fitzgerald Sullivan & Bottini LLP, San Diego, CA, Felicia Medina, Stefanie Roemer, Sa

130 P.3d 213 (2005) 2005 OK 27 Vicki (Root) YOCUM, Petitioner, v. GREENBRIAR NURSING HOME, Fire and Casualty Insurance Company of Connecticut, and the Workers' Compensation Court, Respondents. No. 100,282. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. April 12, 2005. Walt Brune, Walt Brune, P.C., Ponca City, OK, and Fred L. Boettcher, Boettcher Law Offices, Inc