Cases

MELLOY, Circuit Judge. James and Carol Girten appeal the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment for the defendants, which dismissed the plaintiffs’ claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-34 and the Missouri Human Rights Act, Mo. Rev. Stat. §§ 213.010-137. For all practical

746 N.E.2d 429 (2001) INTERIM HEALTHCARE OF FORT WAYNE, INC., Appellant-Defendant, v. Kimberly MOYER, by her next friend, Karen MOYER and Edward Moyer, and Karen Moyer and Edward Moyer, Individually, Appellees-Plaintiffs. No. 02A04-0010-CV-420. Court of Appeals of Indiana. April 30, 2001. Rehearing Denied June 20, 2001.

OPINION BY Judge McCULLOUGH. George E. Podolak and Jacqueline A. Podolak (the Podolaks) appeal the February 17, 2011, order of the Court of Common Pleas of Monroe County (trial court) sustaining the preliminary objections of the Tobyhanna Township Board of Supervisors; John E. Kerrick, Chairman; Heidi A. Pickard, Vice Chairman; Jamie B. Keener; Donald J. Moyer; and Anne Lamberton (collectively referred to

Lundberg Stratton, J., dissenting. {¶ 25} In my view, the village’s liability for a nuisance within the political subdivision does not extend beyond the geographic limits of the political subdivision. Accordingly, for the reasons that follow, I dissent. {¶ 26} In this case, appellees assert that smoke from a smoldering fire on the property of the village blew over an interstate outside of the

540 Pa. 308 (1995) 657 A.2d 915 Heidi MALLOY, Appellee, v. BOYERTOWN AREA SCHOOL BOARD, Boyertown Area School District, Gregory T. Unger, Betty Martin, Gayle V. Buckman, Donna Buckman, Michael Kulp, Helen Moyer, Francis D. Sell, Jean L. Butts, Dr. John C. Crosby, Dr. Warren W. Moser and Alexander Construction Management, Inc., Appellants. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. A

MEMORANDUM OPINION Matthew W. Brann, United States District Judge “In all literature, there is perhaps no more vivid example of a man wrestling with the knowledge of his own guilt than that of Raskolnikov in [Fyodor] Dostoyevsky’s Crime and Punishment.”1 “Throughout Crime and Punishment, Dostoyevsky provides examples of physical actions and

868 A.2d 431 (2005) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Tedor DAVIDO, Appellant. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued December 2, 2003. Decided February 25, 2005. *434 Christopher P. Lyden, for Tedor Davido, appellant. Heidi Fisher Eakin, Amy Zapp, Harrisburg, Susan E. Moyer, Lancaster, for the Com., appellee. <

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 19-0590 Filed November 27, 2019 IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF HEIDI J. KIRSCH AND WILLIAM J. KIRSCH Upon the Petition of HEIDI J. KIRSCH, Petitioner-Appellant, And Concerning WILLIAM J. KIRSCH, Respondent-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Linn County, Mitchell E. Turner, Judge.

LORD, Senior Judge. This is an appeal by Heidi Malloy, a taxpayer, from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Berks County denying a preliminary injunction against the Boyertown Area School District (school district) which sought to enjoin the execution of a contract with Alexander Construction Management (construction manager). Malloy’s principal argument is that the school district entered into a non-bid contract and ther

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 96 Ohio St.3d 45.] THE STATE EX REL. HOWARD, APPELLANT, v. SEAWAY FOODTOWN, INC. ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Howard v. Seaway Foodtown, Inc., 2002-Ohio-3318.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 2002-0013—Submitted April 9, 2002—Decided July 10, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 00AP-1097.

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is hereby affirmed. Judgment affirmed. Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Per Curiam. {¶ 1} The permanent total disability compensation application of appellant-claimant, Gregory T. Howard, was denied by appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. The Court of Appeals for Franklin County upheld that decision on July 23, 2001, by denying appellant’s petition for a writ of mandamus, and we have affirmed that judgment on three occasions. See (2002), 94 Ohio St.3d 171, 761 N.E.2d 37; (2002), 94 Ohio St.3d

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 87 Ohio St.3d 1250.] SMOCK ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. HALL ET AL.; MOTORISTS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE. [Cite as Smock v. Hall, 2000-Ohio-250.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 99-461—Submitted December 15, 1999—Decided February 2, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Geauga County, No. 97-G-2090.

442 F.Supp.2d 838 (2006) GENENTECH, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. INSMED INCORPORATION, et al., Defendants. No. C-04-5429 CW (EMC). United States District Court, N.D. California. August 10, 2006. M. Patricia Thayer, Ethan Glass, Heller Ehrman LLP, San Francisco, CA, William G. Gaede, III, McDermott Will & Emery LLP, Palo Alto, CA, for Plaintiffs. Heidi Str

JORDAN, Circuit Judge. Ronnie Peppers was sentenced in 2003 to fifteen years of imprisonment for being a felon in possession of a firearm. That was the mandatory minimum under the Armed Career Criminal Act ("the ACCA" or "the Act"), and the District Court imposed it because of Peppers's previous convictions. Peppers now challenges that sentence as unconstitutional in light of the Supre

910 P.2d 1328 (1996) 80 Wash.App. 695 Hans SDORRA, a single man; Tacoma Yellow Cab, a Washington corporation; and Washington Guaranty Association, Respondents, v. Mary DICKINSON and "John Doe" Dickinson, wife and husband, Appellants. No. 17641-6-II. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2. February 23, 1996. Reconsideration Denied Mar

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the Illinois Official Reports accuracy and integrity o

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 22–0259 Submitted February 21, 2024—Filed April 19, 2024 BRIAN HORA AND GREGG HORA, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF HORA FARMS, INC., AND PRECISION PARTNERS, CORP., Appellants, vs. KEITH HORA AND KURT HORA, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN THEIR CAPACITY AS SHAREHOLDERS, DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, MANAGERS, AND EMPLOYEES OF HORA FARMS, INC., HEATHER HORA, AND HK FARMS, INC., Appellants.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 22–0259 Submitted February 21, 2024—Filed April 19, 2024 BRIAN HORA and GREGG HORA, Individually and on Behalf of HORA FARMS, INC., and PRECISION PARTNERS, CORP., Appellants, vs. KEITH HORA and KURT HORA, Individually and in Their Capacity as Shareholders, Directors, Officers, Managers, and Employees of HORA FARMS, INC., HEATHER HORA, and HK FARMS, INC., Appellees.