Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Heidi C Morris”
Beto v. Morris (In Re Morris)public domain
196 B.R. 51 (1996) In re Heidi Elise MORRIS, Debtor. Barbara A. BETO, Executrix of the Estate of Bernard Beto, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. Heidi Elise MORRIS, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 95-11230. Adv. No. 96-1004. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. W. Virginia, Clarksburg Division. May 22, 1996. *52 Jerald E. Jones, Clarksburg,
People v. Morrispublic domain
The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries may not be cited or relied upon as they are not the official language of the division. Any discrepancy between the language in the summary and in the opinion should be resolved in favor of the language in the opinion.
San Francisco Human Services Agency v. Heidi S.public domain
Opinion MARGULIES, J. Alexander P. (minor), then three years old, became the subject of a dependency petition after his stepfather, Donald Q. (Donald), assaulted his mother, appellant Heidi S. (Mother), in the minor’s presence. At the time of the filing of the dependency petition, the minor’s paternity was the
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Aug 21 2020, 8:27 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court
Morris v. District of Columbiapublic domain
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 21-CV-0237 WINIFRED MORRIS, APPELLANT, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,
State v. Morrispublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 119,911 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. WILLIE E. MORRIS, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. A defendant is entitled to a voluntary intoxication instruction when
Plater v. United Statespublic domain
Virginia A. Phillips, Chief United States District Judge On December 4, 2017, Defendants United States of America and Acting Secretary of Homeland Security Elaine Duke1 (collectively "Defendants") filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Heidi Summer Wright Plater a.k.a Heidi Wright's ("Plaintiff") First Amended Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and (b)(6) ("Motion"). (Doc. No. 26). On January 12
Kalman v. Morris-North American, Inc.public domain
On Motions for Clarification and Rehearing NESBITT, Judge. We grant the appellant’s motion for clarification and deny both parties’ motions for rehearing; vacate our previous opinion and replace it with the following: Stella Kalman appeals from the grant of a final summary judgment on her claims against appellees for destruction of her household goods. We reverse.
Philip Morris Inc. v. Harshbargerpublic domain
STAHL, Circuit Judge. This appeal implicates the constitutionality of a Massachusetts statute requiring manufacturers of tobacco products to disclose the additives and nicotine-yield ratings of then-products to the state’s public health department. See Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 94, § 307B (the “Disclosure Act”). Plaintiffs-appellants, various manufacturers of cigaret
In re K.C.public domain
[Cite as In re K.C., 2025-Ohio-114.] COURT OF APPEALS ASHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT IN RE: K.C. & R.C. JUDGES: Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J. Hon. Craig R. Baldwin, J. Hon. A
ACCEPTED 01-15-00670-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 10/22/2015 2:24:29 PM
Search & Soc. Media Partners, LLC v. Facebook, Inc.public domain
STARK, U.S. District Judge Presently before the Court is Defendants' Facebook Inc. ("Facebook") and Instagram LLC's ("Instagram" and collectively with Facebook, "Defendants") motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim (the "Motion"), filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (D.I. 8)1 Defendants argue that Plaintiff Search and Social Media Partners, LLC's ("SSMP" or "Plaintiff") ass
In re Z.C.public domain
[Cite as In re Z.C., 2020-Ohio-3635.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ROSS COUNTY IN THE MATTER OF: : Z.C. : Case No. 19CA3693 [HEIDI CARTER] : VS. : DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY [SHA
Kennedy, J., dissenting. {¶ 29} Because the plain language of former Ohio Adm.Code 4123-17-02, 2006-2007 Ohio Monthly Record 1-79, effective July 27, 2006, compels the conclusion that appellee, Daily Services, L.L.C., did not wholly succeed I-Force, L.L.C., in the operation of its business, I dissent. Accordingly, I would affirm the judgment of the Tenth District Court of Appeals granting a writ of mandamus to comp
Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLC v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER WHEELER, Judge. This round two spent nuclear fuel case is before the Court following the partial breach by the Department of Energy (“DOE”) of the 1983 Standard Contract for Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel (“Standard Contract”). Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLC (“En-tergy”) seeks damages for the period August 31, 2008 through June 30, 2013
Mifflinburg Telegraph, Inc. v. Criswellpublic domain
MEMORANDUM MATTHEW W. BRANN, District Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiff Mifflinburg Telegraph’s Motion to Dismiss Defendant Margaret Wolfe’s Counterclaim and to Strike Certain Affirmative Defenses (ECF No. 39). In accordance with the following reasoning, the motion is granted in part, the Defendant’s counterclaim is dismissed without prejudice, the affirmative defenses are stricken without prej
In re C.H.public domain
[Cite as In re C.H., 2020-Ohio-716.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT MERCER COUNTY IN RE: C.H., CASE NO. 10-19-10 NEGLECTED/DEPENDENT CHILD. OPINION [TYLER H. - APPELLANT] IN RE: T.H., CASE NO. 10-19-11 NEGLECTED/DEPENDENT CHILD.
In re G.N.C.public domain
[Cite as In re G.N.C., 2014-Ohio-3092.] COURT OF APPEALS LICKING COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JUDGES: IN THE MATTER OF: G.N.C., : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. A MINOR CHILD : Hon. Sheila G. Farmer, J. : Hon. Pat
August 3 2012 DA 11-0120 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2012 MT 165 CITY OF DEER LODGE ex rel., THE MATTER OF CITY OF DEER LODGE ORDINANCES 130 and 136: SHERMAN ANDERSON and BONNIE ANDERSON, JOHN MOLENDYKE and CHARLOTTE MOLENDYKE, JASON JONES and QUINN JONES, MARK HATHAWAY and MARY HATHAWAY, EMERY D. WE
[Cite as Home S. & L. Co. of Youngstown v. Avery Place, L.L.C., 2015-Ohio-5191.] COURT OF APPEALS DELAWARE COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT HOME SAVINGS AND LOAN : JUDGES: COMPANY OF YOUNGSTOWN, OHIO : : : Hon.