Cases

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge. Hedrick Humphries filed a suit alleging claims of discrimination and retaliation under Title VII and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 against CBOCS West, Inc., based upon his discharge as an associate manager at one of defendant’s Cracker Barrel restaurants. After dismissing Humphries’s Title VII claims as procedurally barred, the district court granted summary judgment in favor of CBOCS West, Inc. (hereinafter “Cra

ARNOLD, Judge. Plaintiff contends that the evidence before the court entitled it to a preliminary injunction and that the order dissolving the temporary restraining order was entered in error. In support of this contention, Coble argues that it will ultimately prevail in the controversy and that the court’s failure to issue injunctive relief will result in irreparable harm to Coble’s business. Coble contends that the Commissio

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 05-4047 HEDRICK G. HUMPHRIES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CBOCS WEST, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

870 S.W.2d 942 (1994) Kenneth PLUNK and Brenda Plunk, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. HEDRICK CONCRETE PRODUCTS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant. No. 18622. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two. February 28, 1994. *943 Joseph C. Blanton, Jr., Blanton, Rice, Sidwell & Ottinger, Sikeston, for defendant-appellan

207 Ga. App. 842 (1993) 429 S.E.2d 322 WILKS v. PIGGLY WIGGLY SOUTHERN, INC. et al. A92A1935. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided March 16, 1993. Underwood & Mathis, Billy C. Mathis, Jr., for appellant. Hodges, Erwin, Hedrick & Kraselsky, William H. Hedrick, David *845 W. O

* * * * * * * * * * * The Full Commission reviewed the prior Order and prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Glenn and the briefs and oral arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing parties have shown good ground to reconsider the evidence in this matter. Having reconsidered the evidence, the Full Commission modifies in part and vacates in part the Deputy Commissioner's Opinion and Award

409 B.R. 770 (2009) In re 222 SOUTH CALDWELL STREET, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP f/d/b/a, The Park Condominiums, Debtor. Langdon M. Cooper, Trustee in Bankruptcy for 222 South Caldwell Street Limited Partnership v. BB Syndication Services, Inc., et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 08-31710. Adversary No. 08-3151. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division.

PER CURIAM: We affirm the judgment of the district court for the reasons set out in its dispositive order which is reproduced in the appendix. AFFIRMED. APPENDIX ORDER This antitrust case is before the Court on the

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0074p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT KASSI TCHANKPA, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellant, │ │

318 S.E.2d 872 (1984) SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Ernest L. Williams, Stephen C. Cloer and Richard D. Ussery v. O'BOYLE TANK LINES, INC. No. 8317SC326. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. August 21, 1984. *874 Bell & White by W. Thomas White, Mount Airy, for plaintiffs-appellants. *875

669 F.2d 799 216 U.S.App.D.C. 1 ANAHEIM, RIVERSIDE, BANNING, COLTON, AND AZUSA, CALIFORNIA,Petitioners,v.FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent, SouthernCalifornia Edison Company, Intervenor.SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, Petitioner,v.FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent,Anza Electric Cooperative, Inc., the Cities of Anaheim,Riverside, Banning, Colton and Az

Crescent Univ. City Venture, LLC v. AP Atl., Inc., 2019 NCBC 46. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION MECKLENBURG COUNTY 15 CVS 14745 (Master File) CRESCENT UNIVERSITY CITY VENTURE, LLC, Plaintiff, v. AP ATLANTIC, INC. d/b/a ADOLFSON & PETERSON CONSTRUCTION, Defendant, v. MADISON CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC.; TRUSSWAY MANUFACTURIN

BRITT, Judge. Plaintiff assigns as error the court’s allowance of defendants’ motion for a directed verdict in accordance with Rule 50 of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure at the close of plaintiff’s evidence. The question of law presented by defendants’ motion is whether plaintiff’s evidence was sufficient for submission to the jury. Kelly v. Harvester Co., 278 N.C. 153, 179 S.E. 2d 396 (1971).

678 S.E.2d 757 (2009) Hyman Spruill LEGGETT, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AAA COOPER TRANSPORTATION, INC., Defendant-Appellant. No. COA08-1027. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. July 7, 2009. *758 Keel O'Malley, L.L.P., by Joseph P. Tunstall, III, Tarboro, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Hedrick, Gardner, Kincheloe & Garofalo, L.L

644 F.Supp.2d 696 (2009) Mercedalia Hernandez GARCIA, Mirelda Garcia Dominguez, Mareli Cupil Zapata, Maria Zapata Arias, Yaimi Cupil Zapata and Juan Cupil Arias, individually and on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. FROG ISLAND SEAFOOD, INC., Robert D. White and Janice White Harris, Defendants. No. 2:06-CV-46-F. United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Nor

633 S.E.2d 854 (2006) Tom BOWEN, Employee, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ABF FREIGHT SYSTEMS, INC., Successor-in-Interest to Carolina Freight Carriers Corporation, Self-Insured (GAB Robins, Servicing Agent), Employer, Defendant-Appellant. No. COA05-1257. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. September 5, 2006. *855 Hedrick Eatman Gardner

827 F.Supp.2d 1364 (2011) STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. KING SPORTS, INC., Jui-Chen Chang, and Roger Cleveland Golf Company, Inc., Defendants. Civil Action File No. 1:10-cv-131-TCB. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. December 7, 2011. *1367 Douglas Lee Clayton, Maren R. Cave, Swi

442 F.Supp.2d 438 (2006) Mary TOROK, Plaintiff, v. GIBRALTER VETERINARY HOSPITAL, INC., Defendant. No. 04-74699. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. August 10, 2006. *439 *440 Ann Curry Thompson, Kelman, Loria, Detroit, MI, for Plaintiff. Dirk A. Beamer, Wrig

128 S.W.3d 164 (2004) Norman L. SHELBY, Claimant-Appellant, v. HAYWARD BAKER, INC., employer, and Division of Employment Security, Respondents. No. 25784. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two. February 25, 2004. *165 Donald Rhodes, Bloomfield, MO, for Appellant. Larry R. Ruhmann, St. Louis, MO, for Re

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION ONE CARRIE S. SCHULTZ and ROBERT C. ) No. ED111241 SCHULTZ, SR., surviving parents of ) ROBERT C. SCHULTZ, JR., deceased, ) ) Appeal from the Circuit Court Respondents, ) of Saint Charles County