⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Heather Marie Evans”

Mississippi Supreme Court · 2015-10-15 · Published · cited 0× · 180 So. 3d 624; 2015 Miss. LEXIS 518; 2015 WL 5996929
RANDOLPH, Presiding Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. In this “battle of the experts” case, the trial court first denied a motion in limine by Marcia and Donald Marie to exclude entries made by Dr. Dennis Boul-ware, a consulting physician, in his medical records and then denied the Maries’ Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict (JNOV) after a judgment was entered in favor of Dr. Heather North an
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007-10-04 · Published · cited 0× · 80 Fed. Cl. 321; 250 F. App'x 321
Judgment PER CURIAM: This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2006-03-30 · Published · cited 0×
</
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2006-03-30 · Published · cited 0×
MCMEEKIN V. MCMEEKIN COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-05-118-CV EUGENE E. MCMEEKIN APPELLANT V.
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2014-08-05 · Published · cited 16× · 442 S.W.3d 676; 2014 WL 3827901; 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 8504
OPINION Opinion by Justice EVANS. Appellant Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. appeals from various rulings of the trial court arguing appellee lacks standing to assert claims as landlord. Appellant also contends that the trial court erred in its admission of expert witness testimony. We affirm. BACKGRO
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007-05-03 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 06-1952 HEATHER GILLESPIE AND ANGELA CINSON, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, L.L.C., Defendant-Appellee. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court fo
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012-10-30 · Published · cited 0× · 171 Wash. App. 585; 287 P.3d 710
Sweeney, J. ¶1 This appeal follows a defense verdict in a suit for excessive use of force by a police officer. The *588plaintiff was shocked with a stun gun by a Spokane County sheriff’s deputy following a run-in with the deputy that followed a traffic stop. The plaintiff was a passenger in the car. The assignments of error include challenges to the court’s various rulin
District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2012-10-29 · Published · cited 1× · 907 F. Supp. 2d 1284; 54 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1302; 2012 WL 5379351; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154596
MEMORANDUM OPINION C. LYNWOOD SMITH, JR., District Judge. This is an action in which the plaintiff, Tondalaya Evans, alleged claims against her former employer, Books-A-Million, under four federal statutes: ie., the Equal Pay Act of 1963, 29 U.S.C. § 206(d)(1); Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, 29 U.S.C. § 2
District Court, E.D. Washington · 2016-03-23 · Published · cited 4× · 172 F. Supp. 3d 1167; 128 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1838; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38049
ORDER GRANTING RECONSIDERATION AND AMENDING THE SUM- ' MARY JUDGMENT ORDER THOMAS O. RICE, Chief United States District Judge BEFORE THE COURT is Defendants’ Motion for Reconsideration Re: ECF. No. 90 (ECF No. 92). This matter was submitted for .consideration without oral argument. The Court — having reviewed the briefing, the record, and files therein — is fully informed. For the reasons discussed belo
District Court, E.D. Washington · 2015-12-22 · Published · cited 0× · 151 F. Supp. 3d 1135; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170834; 128 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1033; 2015 WL 9413105
ORDER DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT THOMAS O. RICE, United States District Judge BEFORE THE COURT is Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 76). This matter was heard on December 10, 2015, in Spokane, Washington. Brian J. Iller appeared on behalf of Plaintiff. Markus W. Louvier appeared on behalf of Defendants. The Court has revie
District Court, E.D. Washington · 2006-06-27 · Published · cited 5× · 438 F. Supp. 2d 1252; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44063; 2006 WL 1788548
438 F.Supp.2d 1252 (2006) Debra RENTZ and Billie Rentz, as copersonal representatives of the Estate of Christopher L. Rentz, et al., Plaintiffs, and William Rentz, in his individual capacity, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. SPOKANE COUNTY, et al., Defendants. No. CV-05-83—AAM. United States District Court, E.D. Washington. June 27, 2006. *
District Court, E.D. New York · 2012-09-27 · Published · cited 13× · 893 F. Supp. 2d 374; 83 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 797; 2012 WL 4458404; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139606; 96 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,650; 116 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 355
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOSEPH F. BIANCO, District Judge: Plaintiffs Judy Calibuso (“Calibuso”), Julie Moss (“Moss”), Dianne Goedtel (“Goedtel”), Jean Evans (“Evans”) and Mary DeSalvatore (“DeSalvatore”) (collectively “plaintiffs”) commenced this action on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, against Bank of America Corporation (“BofA,” “BOA” or “Bank of America”), Merrill Lynch & Co.
District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018-07-31 · Published · cited 16× · 328 F. Supp. 3d 273
KATHERINE B. FORREST, United States District Judge Each week, to ensure a more secure future, employees throughout the United States contribute portions of their paychecks to retirement savings accounts. An employer sponsoring a retirement plan becomes a fiduciary under the Employee Retirement Income Savings Act ("ERISA") and is required to act vis-à-vis a plan with the care, skill, and diligence that a prudent person would use in a
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005-12-20 · Published · cited 115× · 432 F.3d 1368; 77 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1321; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 28061; 2005 WL 3468126
432 F.3d 1368 Nicholas V. PERRICONE, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellant,v.MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION, Defendant-Cross Appellant. No. 05-1022. No. 05-1023. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. December 20, 2005. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Raphael V. Lupo, McDermott W
California Supreme Court · 2018-08-27 · Published · cited 34× · 237 Cal. Rptr. 3d 205; 6 Cal. 5th 21; 424 P.3d 290
KRUGER, J. **293 Plaintiff William Jae Kim (Kim) was severely injured after he lost control of his Toyota Tundra pickup truck and drove off an embankment. Together with his wife, Kim brought this strict products liability suit against defendant Toyota Motor Corporation and related entities
Michigan Supreme Court · 2020-10-27 · Published · cited 0×
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan October 27, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice 159239-40 David F. Viviano,
Michigan Supreme Court · 2020-10-27 · Published · cited 0×
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan October 27, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice 159235-8 David F. Viviano,
Michigan Supreme Court · 2019-04-05 · Published · cited 0×
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan April 5, 2019 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem 159235-8(72)
District Court, D. Colorado · 2002-01-23 · Published · cited 0× · 191 F. Supp. 2d 1194; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11000; 2002 WL 424392
191 F.Supp.2d 1194 (2002) Sean GRAVES, a minor, by his parents, Randal GRAVES and Natalie Graves, Plaintiffs, v. Jefferson County Sheriff John C. STONE, individually and in his official capacity, Former Jefferson County Sheriff Ronald Beckham, individually and in his official capacity, Jefferson County Sheriff's Department, Neil Gardner, individually, John Hicks, individually, Mark M. Miller, individually, T. Williams, individually, Mike Guerra,
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017-10-23 · Published · cited 0× · 699 F. App'x 228
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Marie Therese H. Assa’ad-Faltas appeals the district court’s order denying her self-styled Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to reopen her civil action against numerous defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Faltas’ motions for appointment of counse