Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Heather Lynn Elliott”
In re C.M.public domain
LYNN, J., concurring specially. I concur in the result reached in Justice Hicks’s decision, but write separately to address more fully my reasons for disagreeing with the dissenting opinion. In Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, 452 U.S. 18, 31-32 (1981), the United States Supreme Court held that there is no automatic right to appointed counsel for an indigent parent in a parental rights ter
State of Tennessee v. Ricky Lynn Earlspublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 25, 2001 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. RICKY LYNN EARLS Appeal from the Circuit Court for Bedford County No. 14684 Franklin Lee Russell, Judge No. M2001-00063-CCA-R3-CD - Filed October 25, 2001 The defendant, Ricky Lynn Earls, appeals from his conviction for theft
280 B.R. 246 (2002) In re FIRST ALLIANCE MORTGAGE COMPANY, a California corporation; First Alliance Corporation, a Delaware corporation; First Alliance Mortgage Company, a Minnesota corporation; and First Alliance Portfolio Services, a Nevada Corporation, Debtors. Frank G. Aiello, Nicolena Aiello, et al individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. First Alliance Mortgage Company, a California corporation; First
State v. Addisonpublic domain
TABLE OF CONTENTS I. THE CAPITAL MURDER...................................................... 412 n. PROCEDURAL HISTORY..................................................... 414 III. PROCEDURE IN CAPITAL MURDER.................................... 417 *410IV. APPELLATE STANDARDS OF REVIEW................................ 4
Johnston v. Geisepublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ALETA A. TRAUGER, District Judge. On December 16, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) (Docket No. 39), which recommends that (1) the Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 20) filed by Defendant Lucien C. Geise (“Geise”) be granted, and (2) the two pending Motions for Temporary Restraining Order filed by pro se Plaintiff Louie E. John
Skundor v. McBridepublic domain
280 F.Supp.2d 524 (2003) David SKUNDOR, Plaintiff, v. Thomas McBRIDE, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 5:02-0205. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Beckley Division. September 10, 2003. David Skundor, pro se, for Plaintiff. Charles Houdyschell, Jr., Esq., Heather A. Connolly, Esq., Office of Attorney General, Assistant Attorney General, Charlest
NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 11/14/2023 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:.42:19 NON- COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr
02-11-378--390-CV_COR
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-11-00378-CV DAVID J. KANTNER AND WIFE, APPELLANTS SHERI K. KANTNER, JON D. MATHE, DAVID MOORE, AND WIFE, SYLVIA MOORE, AND MICHAEL MORRIS AND WIFE, KIM MORRIS V. CHESAPEAKE ENERGY APPELLEES CORPORATION AND CHESAPEAKE EXPLORATION, LLC
ORDER GRANTING INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT II OF ILLINOIS’S COMPLAINT AND DENYING INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION CARTER, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendants Brian Chisick, Patricia Sullivan, and Salah Basta-way’s (the Individual Defendants)1 motion to dismiss Count II as it relates to the individual defendants, for a mor
Farley v. Engelkenpublic domain
241 Kan. 663 (1987) 740 P.2d 1058 ROGER L. FARLEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF LANA S. FARLEY, Appellant, v. SUSAN ENGELKEN, M.D., and COMMUNITY HOSPITAL DISTRICT No. 1, Appellees. HEATHER DITTO, a minor, and DANIELLE DITTO, a minor, by and through Douglas and Cheryl Ditto, individually and as natural guardians and next friends of Heather Ditto and Danielle Ditto, Appellees, v. SHAWNEE MISSIO
John P. Fitzgerald, III v. Alfred H. Siegelpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-2240 In re: CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INCORPORATED; CIRCUIT CITY STORES WEST COAST, INCORPORATED; INTERTAN, INC.; VENTOUX INTERNATIONAL, INC.; CIRCUIT CITY PURCHASING COMPANY, LLC; CC AVIATION, LLC; CC DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF VIRGINIA, INC.; CIRCUIT CITY PROPERTIES, LLC; KINZER TECHNOLOG
Commonwealth v. Rosspublic domain
DISSENTING OPINION BY ALLEN, J.: I respectfully dissent from the Majority’s determination that Appellant, Paul Aaron Ross (“Ross”), is entitled to a new trial, and that evidence of his prior bad acts was inadmissible under Pa.R.Evid. 404(b). See Majority Opinion at 87. The Majority concluded “that the trial court manifestly abused its discretion in refusing to grant Ross a continuance to permit his newl
ORDER This matter originated in this Court on the filing of a report by the Commission on Continuing Legal Education (the “Commission”) pursuant to Gov. Bar R. X, Sec. 6, Div. (A)(1)(b) and Div. (A)(2)(d). The Commission recommended the imposition of sanctions against certain attorneys and judges, including the above-named respondent, for failure to comply with the applicable continuing legal education provisions of Gov. Bar R. X and Gov. J
United States v. Warnagirispublic domain
Appendix A Department of Justice Chart Documenting Sentences in Capitol Breach Cases Monday, January 6, 2025 SENTENCES IMPOSED IN CASES ARISING OUT OF THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6, 2021 Disclaimer: Those relying on information contained in this document should verify all information for accuracy Table 1: Cases in which the government recommended a probation sentence without home detention 1 0F Defendant Ca
Matter of Attorneys Inviolation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (2024 NY Slip Op 04648) Matter of Attorneys Inviolation of Judiciary Law § 468-a 2024 NY Slip Op 04648 Decided on September 26, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by
FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicinepublic domain
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 602 U. S. Part 1 Pages 367–405 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 13, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ
Jihad Adbul-Mumit v. Alexandria Hyundai, LLCpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1582 JIHAD ADBUL-MUMIT; MATTHEW ABEDI; MONICA ADAIR SARGENT; MARK AGEE; ALIZ AGOSTON; YVONNE ALSTON; DAN AMATRUDA; KRISTY AMBROSE; KIMBERLEY AMICK; WANDA G. AMOS; CHRISTOPHER ARAUZA; CARL ARSENAULT; BROOKE ASHER; MICHELLE ATKINS; RAYMOND O. ATKINS; MATTHEW ATWELL; DAVID AUB; SOHA AYYASH; ASIF AZIZ; SUSAN BAILEY; KAREN BAKER; HAB BA
Atwood v. Shankspublic domain
958 P.2d 332 (1998) 91 Wash.App. 404 Karen J. ATWOOD, Charles E. Cable, Kenneth Aadsen, Valerie Shepard Aadsen, Jack A. Aiello, Kathryn I. Aiello, Bruce Angell, Joe Bailey, Larry L. Barcott, Lydia Barcott, Lynn Barcott, Burton E. Baxter, Dave Baxter, Gary Baxter, Randy Baxter, Tawna Baxter, Ed Bendure, Rick Bendure, Carl Berg, Jr., Paul Berg, Sandi Berg, Thomas Berger, Lynn Berger, Ron Berger, Stan J. Bianchi, Jeff G. Bishop, Fran
Kenneth Ackerman v. ExxonMobil Corporationpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1103 KENNETH ACKERMAN; JAMES ACKERMAN; APRIL ACKERMAN; MARY ACKERMAN, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Thomas Ackerman; CHARLES V. ADAMS; CHRISTIANNE M. ADAMS; JOHN ALEXIS; CHARLES J. ARKINS; LULA M. ARKINS; THOMAS J. ARNO; AMY H. ARNO, Both individually and as next friends of A.A. and E.A.; R