⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Heather A Slater”

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013-02-15 · Published · cited 0× · 27 N.J. Tax 185
PER CURIAM. Plaintiff appeals from a decision of the Tax Court that denied his motion seeking a refund of Sales and Use tax (“S & U”) and *187granted the motion filed by defendant, Director, Division of Taxation (the Director), to dismiss his complaint with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The facts and issues raised by this appeal are set forth
Childers v. Slaterpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2000-09-18 · Published · cited 109× · 197 F.R.D. 185; 48 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 396; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17019; 2000 WL 1724527
MEMORANDUM OPINION Granting the Plaintiffs Motion to Reopen Discovery Vacating in Part the Grant of Summary Judgment to the Defendant URBINA District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This Title VII matter comes before the court upon the plaintiffs motions for limited reopening of discovery and for limited reconsideration of the court’s order granting partial summary judgment to the defendant. Th
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2024-04-30 · Published · cited 27× · 547 P.3d 287
Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two
Slater v. Directorpublic domain
New Jersey Tax Court · 2012-04-27 · Published · cited 11× · 26 N.J. Tax 322
BIANCO, J.T.C. This matter comes before the Tax Court by letter from pro se plaintiff, Glenn B. Slater (“Mr. Slater”), which the court treated as a motion for summary judgment seeking a refund of Sales and Use tax (“S & U”); and the cross motion filed by the Director, seeking to dismiss Mr. Slater’s complaint with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, pursuant to R. 4:6-2.
Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2015-02-11 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 14-1079 Filed February 11, 2015 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. BRANDON BLAKE SLATER, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Cerro Gordo County, Karen K. Salic, District Associate Judge. Brandon Slater appeals from his three separate convictions and
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019-10-07 · Published · cited 3× · 449 P.3d 1070
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) ) No. 7751 3-8-I Respondent, ) ) DIVISION ONE v.
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2026-03-18 · Published · cited 0× · 2026 Ark. App. 196
Cite as 2026 Ark. App. 196 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION IV No. CR-25-274 Opinion Delivered March 18, 2026 CHARLES SLATER APPEAL FROM THE FULTON COUNTY APPELLANT CIRCUIT COURT
Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995-11-15 · Published · cited 10× · 658 N.E.2d 481; 213 Ill. Dec. 11; 276 Ill. App. 3d 182
658 N.E.2d 481 (1995) 276 Ill.App.3d 182 213 Ill.Dec. 11 The COUNTY OF WHITESIDE, Whiteside County Board of Review, City of Sterling, Sterling Community Unit School District No. 5, Sterling Township, Sauk Valley Community College District No. 506, Sterling Park District, Sterling Rural Fire Protection District, Hopkins Township, City of Rock Falls, Rock Falls Elementary School District No. 13, Rock Falls To
Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2020-02-05 · Published · cited 0×
SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may not have been summarized. Estate of Mary Van Riper v. Director, Division of Taxation (A-51-18) (082000) Argued October 8, 2019 -- Decided February 5, 2020 SOLOMON, J., writing for the Court. Un
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005-03-13 · Published · cited 2× · 360 F. Supp. 2d 905; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4583; 2005 WL 589775
360 F.Supp.2d 905 (2005) JAMSPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, Plaintiff, v. PARADAMA PRODUCTIONS, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 02 C 2298. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. March 13, 2005. *906 Bruce S. Sperling, Greg Shinall, Robert David Cheifetz, Thomas David Brooks, Sperling & Slater, James David
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005-08-15 · Published · cited 1× · 382 F. Supp. 2d 1056; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17452; 2005 WL 2001284
382 F.Supp.2d 1056 (2005) JAMSPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, Plaintiff, v. PARADAMA PRODUCTIONS, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 02 C 2298. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. August 15, 2005. *1057 James David Roberts, Margaret Egan Lawler, DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary U.S. LLP, Jeffrey Singer, Paul E. Woj
Liguori v. Elmannpublic domain
Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2007-06-25 · Published · cited 4× · 924 A.2d 556; 191 N.J. 527; 2007 N.J. LEXIS 705
924 A.2d 556 (2007) 191 N.J. 527 Patricia LIGUORI, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Geraldine Liguori, and as Executrix of the Estate of John J. Liguori, and John C. Liguori, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Elie M. ELMANN, M.D., James B. Hunter, M.D. and Cardiac Surgery Group, P.A., Defendants-Respondents, and Peter Praeger, M.D., Diane Anderson, R.N., Lynnann Anderson, R.N., Nilo Antonio, R.N., Sharon Bready,
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004-08-19 · Published · cited 6× · 336 F. Supp. 2d 824; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16508; 2004 WL 1880029
336 F.Supp.2d 824 (2004) JAMSPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, Plaintiff, v. PARADAMA PRODUCTIONS, INC., et al. Defendants. No. 02 C 2298. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. August 19, 2004. *825 *826 Bruce S. Sperling, Greg Shinall, Robert David Cheifetz, Thomas David
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022-02-24 · Published · cited 0× · 2022 NY Slip Op 01222
Matter of Christopher WW. v Avonna XX. (2022 NY Slip Op 01222) Matter of Christopher WW. v Avonna XX. 2022 NY Slip Op 01222 Decided on February 24, 2022 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State L
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011-10-27 · Published · cited 13× · 88 A.D.3d 1167; 931 N.Y.2d 751
Lahtinen, J. Respondent Frederick QQ. (hereinafter the father) and respondent Kristian PR (hereinafter the mother) are the biological parents of a daughter (born in 2004). Petitioner (hereinafter the grandmother) is the child’s maternal grandmother. The child has been the subject of numerous custody proceedings. Briefly, the child resided with the grandmother from birth through 2008. In July 2007, an order was entered giving
Rountree v. Johannspublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2005-08-11 · Published · cited 9× · 382 F. Supp. 2d 19; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16400; 96 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 713; 2005 WL 1926469
382 F.Supp.2d 19 (2005) Reginald J. ROUNTREE, Plaintiff, v. Mike JOHANNS, Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Defendant. No. CIV.A.04-806 ESH. United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 11, 2005. *20 Richard L. Swick, Swick & Shapiro, P.C., Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Heather D. Graham-Oliver, U.S.
Nurriddin v. Goldinpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2005-08-17 · Published · cited 136× · 382 F. Supp. 2d 79; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17079; 2005 WL 1994235
382 F.Supp.2d 79 (2005) Ahmad B. NURRIDDIN Plaintiff, v. Daniel GOLDIN, in his official capacity as Administrator, National Aeronautics and Space Administration Defendant. No. CIV.A. 99-3401JDB. United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 17, 2005. *80 *81
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010-04-29 · Published · cited 11× · 604 F.3d 98; 94 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1908; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 8865
604 F.3d 98 (2010) ARKANSAS CARPENTERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, Maria Locurto, Paper, Allied-Indus, United Food and Commercial Workers Union-Employer, Louisiana Wholesale Drug Co., Inc., CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Rite Aid Corporation, Arthur's Drug Store, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BAYER AG, Bayer Corp., formerly doing business as Miles Inc., Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., The Rugby Group, Inc., Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Barr Laboratories Inc.,
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2013-08-07 · Published · cited 2× · 122 So. 3d 584; 2013 WL 4008772; 2013 La. App. LEXIS 1586
LOLLEY, J. |, William D. Desadier appeals the judgment of the Office of Workers’ Compensation, District 2, Parish of Winn, State of Louisiana (the “OWC”), wherein the OWC rendered judgment in favor of defendant West Frasier, Inc. For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment of the OWC. FACTS Desadier was employed by West Frasier, Inc. (“West Frasier”) on October 20, 2010, as a lumber
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017-01-23 · Published · cited 1× · 676 F. App'x 787
ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Bobby R. Baldock Circuit Judge Relators Anthony Hanlon and Linda Dollar appeal the district court’s dismissal of their qui tam complaint alleging the defendants violated the Anti-Kickback statute (“AKS”), 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b, the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3729, and Colorado state law, as well as its refusal to allow them to amend their complain