Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Heather A Slater”
Slater v. Director, Division of Taxationpublic domain
PER CURIAM. Plaintiff appeals from a decision of the Tax Court that denied his motion seeking a refund of Sales and Use tax (“S & U”) and *187granted the motion filed by defendant, Director, Division of Taxation (the Director), to dismiss his complaint with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The facts and issues raised by this appeal are set forth
Childers v. Slaterpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION Granting the Plaintiffs Motion to Reopen Discovery Vacating in Part the Grant of Summary Judgment to the Defendant URBINA District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This Title VII matter comes before the court upon the plaintiffs motions for limited reopening of discovery and for limited reconsideration of the court’s order granting partial summary judgment to the defendant. Th
State Of Washington, V. Heather Azevedopublic domain
Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two
Slater v. Directorpublic domain
BIANCO, J.T.C. This matter comes before the Tax Court by letter from pro se plaintiff, Glenn B. Slater (“Mr. Slater”), which the court treated as a motion for summary judgment seeking a refund of Sales and Use tax (“S & U”); and the cross motion filed by the Director, seeking to dismiss Mr. Slater’s complaint with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, pursuant to R. 4:6-2.
State of Iowa v. Brandon Blake Slaterpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 14-1079 Filed February 11, 2015 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. BRANDON BLAKE SLATER, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Cerro Gordo County, Karen K. Salic, District Associate Judge. Brandon Slater appeals from his three separate convictions and
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) ) No. 7751 3-8-I Respondent, ) ) DIVISION ONE v.
Charles Slater v. State of Arkansaspublic domain
Cite as 2026 Ark. App. 196 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION IV No. CR-25-274 Opinion Delivered March 18, 2026 CHARLES SLATER APPEAL FROM THE FULTON COUNTY APPELLANT CIRCUIT COURT
County of Whiteside v. Property Tax Appeal Boardpublic domain
658 N.E.2d 481 (1995) 276 Ill.App.3d 182 213 Ill.Dec. 11 The COUNTY OF WHITESIDE, Whiteside County Board of Review, City of Sterling, Sterling Community Unit School District No. 5, Sterling Township, Sauk Valley Community College District No. 506, Sterling Park District, Sterling Rural Fire Protection District, Hopkins Township, City of Rock Falls, Rock Falls Elementary School District No. 13, Rock Falls To
Estate of Mary Van Riper v. Director, Division of Taxation (082000) (Tax Court & Statewide)public domain
SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may not have been summarized. Estate of Mary Van Riper v. Director, Division of Taxation (A-51-18) (082000) Argued October 8, 2019 -- Decided February 5, 2020 SOLOMON, J., writing for the Court. Un
360 F.Supp.2d 905 (2005) JAMSPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, Plaintiff, v. PARADAMA PRODUCTIONS, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 02 C 2298. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. March 13, 2005. *906 Bruce S. Sperling, Greg Shinall, Robert David Cheifetz, Thomas David Brooks, Sperling & Slater, James David
382 F.Supp.2d 1056 (2005) JAMSPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, Plaintiff, v. PARADAMA PRODUCTIONS, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 02 C 2298. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. August 15, 2005. *1057 James David Roberts, Margaret Egan Lawler, DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary U.S. LLP, Jeffrey Singer, Paul E. Woj
Liguori v. Elmannpublic domain
924 A.2d 556 (2007) 191 N.J. 527 Patricia LIGUORI, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Geraldine Liguori, and as Executrix of the Estate of John J. Liguori, and John C. Liguori, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Elie M. ELMANN, M.D., James B. Hunter, M.D. and Cardiac Surgery Group, P.A., Defendants-Respondents, and Peter Praeger, M.D., Diane Anderson, R.N., Lynnann Anderson, R.N., Nilo Antonio, R.N., Sharon Bready,
336 F.Supp.2d 824 (2004) JAMSPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, Plaintiff, v. PARADAMA PRODUCTIONS, INC., et al. Defendants. No. 02 C 2298. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. August 19, 2004. *825 *826 Bruce S. Sperling, Greg Shinall, Robert David Cheifetz, Thomas David
Matter of Christopher WW. v. Avonna XX.public domain
Matter of Christopher WW. v Avonna XX. (2022 NY Slip Op 01222) Matter of Christopher WW. v Avonna XX. 2022 NY Slip Op 01222 Decided on February 24, 2022 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State L
Daphne OO. v. Frederick QQ.public domain
Lahtinen, J. Respondent Frederick QQ. (hereinafter the father) and respondent Kristian PR (hereinafter the mother) are the biological parents of a daughter (born in 2004). Petitioner (hereinafter the grandmother) is the child’s maternal grandmother. The child has been the subject of numerous custody proceedings. Briefly, the child resided with the grandmother from birth through 2008. In July 2007, an order was entered giving
Rountree v. Johannspublic domain
382 F.Supp.2d 19 (2005) Reginald J. ROUNTREE, Plaintiff, v. Mike JOHANNS, Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Defendant. No. CIV.A.04-806 ESH. United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 11, 2005. *20 Richard L. Swick, Swick & Shapiro, P.C., Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Heather D. Graham-Oliver, U.S.
Nurriddin v. Goldinpublic domain
382 F.Supp.2d 79 (2005) Ahmad B. NURRIDDIN Plaintiff, v. Daniel GOLDIN, in his official capacity as Administrator, National Aeronautics and Space Administration Defendant. No. CIV.A. 99-3401JDB. United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 17, 2005. *80 *81
604 F.3d 98 (2010) ARKANSAS CARPENTERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, Maria Locurto, Paper, Allied-Indus, United Food and Commercial Workers Union-Employer, Louisiana Wholesale Drug Co., Inc., CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Rite Aid Corporation, Arthur's Drug Store, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BAYER AG, Bayer Corp., formerly doing business as Miles Inc., Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., The Rugby Group, Inc., Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Barr Laboratories Inc.,
Desadier v. West Frasier, Inc.public domain
LOLLEY, J. |, William D. Desadier appeals the judgment of the Office of Workers’ Compensation, District 2, Parish of Winn, State of Louisiana (the “OWC”), wherein the OWC rendered judgment in favor of defendant West Frasier, Inc. For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment of the OWC. FACTS Desadier was employed by West Frasier, Inc. (“West Frasier”) on October 20, 2010, as a lumber
ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Bobby R. Baldock Circuit Judge Relators Anthony Hanlon and Linda Dollar appeal the district court’s dismissal of their qui tam complaint alleging the defendants violated the Anti-Kickback statute (“AKS”), 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b, the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3729, and Colorado state law, as well as its refusal to allow them to amend their complain