⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Healthy Gulf v. FERC”

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025-03-28 · Published · cited 1× · 132 F.4th 544
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 10, 2024 Decided March 28, 2025 No. 23-1226 HEALTHY GULF AND SIERRA CLUB, PETITIONERS v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, RESPONDENT DRIFTWOOD LNG LLC AND DRIFTWOOD PIPELINE LLC, INTERVENORS On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2024-07-16 · Published · cited 2× · 107 F.4th 1033
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued February 12, 2024 Decided July 16, 2024 No. 23-1069 HEALTHY GULF, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, RESPONDENT COMMONWEALTH LNG, LLC, INTERVENOR Consolidated with 23-1071 On Petition
Healthy Gulf v. DOIpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025-08-29 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued May 6, 2025 Decided August 29, 2025 No. 24-1024 HEALTHY GULF, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, ET AL., RESPONDENTS AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, INTERVENOR On Petition for Review of a Final Action
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-03-27 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) HEALTHY GULF, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) DOUG BURGUM, et al., 1
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023-09-06 · Published · cited 4× · 81 F.4th 510
Case: 22-60397 Document: 00516886063 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/06/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED
District Court, District of Columbia · 2026-05-21 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) HEALTHY GULF, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) DOUG BURGUM, et al.,
Sierra Club v. FERCpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025-09-30 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued March 4, 2025 Decided September 30, 2025 No. 24-1099 SIERRA CLUB AND APPALACHIAN VOICES, PETITIONERS v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, RESPONDENT TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, L.L.C., ET AL., INTERVENORS Consolidated with 24-1198
Sierra Club v. FERCpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025-09-30 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued March 4, 2025 Decided September 30, 2025 No. 24-1099 SIERRA CLUB AND APPALACHIAN VOICES, PETITIONERS v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, RESPONDENT TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, L.L.C., ET AL., INTERVENORS Consolidated with 24-1198
District Court, District of Columbia · 2026-03-23 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HEALTHY GULF, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 1:24-cv-02175 (TNM) BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT, Defendant, and AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, Intervenor-Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINIO
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2024-07-30 · Published · cited 3× · 111 F.4th 42
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued March 15, 2024 Decided July 30, 2024 No. 23-1064 NEW JERSEY CONSERVATION FOUNDATION, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, RESPONDENT NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF RATE COUNSEL, ET AL., INTERVENORS Consolidated with 23-1074, 23-1077, 23-
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2024-04-30 · Published · cited 8× · 100 F.4th 207
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 5, 2023 Decided April 30, 2024 No. 22-1101 ALABAMA MUNICIPAL DISTRIBUTORS GROUP, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, RESPONDENT SOUTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY, L.L.C., ET AL., INTERVENORS Consolidated with 22-1171, 22-1256, 22-12
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025-01-07 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued May 7, 2024 Decided January 7, 2025 No. 23-1046 CITIZENS ACTION COALITION OF INDIANA, INC., PETITIONER v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, RESPONDENT TEXAS GAS TRANSMISSION, LLC, INTERVENOR On Petition for Review of Orders o
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-09-15 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL : DIVERSITY, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 24-1285 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 9
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2025-03-28 · Published · cited 6× · 132 F.4th 872
Case: 23-40555 Document: 102-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/28/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED March 28, 2025 No. 2
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012-06-22 · Published · cited 15× · 401 U.S. App. D.C. 227; 682 F.3d 1032; 2012 WL 2362585; 75 ERC (BNA) 1232; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 12780
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GARLAND. GARLAND, Circuit Judge: In 2008, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a rule regulating renovation and remodeling activities that create health hazards arising from lead paint. The rule contained an “opt-out” provision, which exempted owner-occupied housing from the rule’s requirements
District Court, District of Columbia · 2023-09-20 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA F. SCOTT BAUER, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Case No. 18-3047 (RJL) ) FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE ) CORPORATION, et al.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021-05-28 · Published · cited 19× · 998 F.3d 931
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued March 24, 2021 Decided May 28, 2021 No. 20-5341 MEDINATURA, INC., APPELLANT v. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION, ET AL., APPELLEES Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:20-cv-02066)
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-04-01 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GREEN OCEANS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 1:24-cv-141-RCL UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, et al., Defendants, and REVOLUTION WIND, LLC, Defendant-Intervenor. MEMORANDUM OPINION Forty-five plaintiffs bring this lawsuit to challenge federal
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-08-22 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SHOSHONE-BANNOCK TRIBES Nos. 23-35543 OF THE FORT HALL 23-35544 RESERVATION, D.C. No. 4:20-cv- Plaintiff-Appellee, 00553-BLW v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE OPINION INTERIOR; UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT; LAURA DANIEL- DAVIS, Principal Deputy Assista
District Court, N.D. Florida · 2012-02-18 · Published · cited 0× · 853 F. Supp. 2d 1138; 42 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20048; 75 ERC (BNA) 1433; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21778; 2012 WL 537529
ORDER ON THE MERITS ROBERT L. HINKLE, District Judge. The Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency has adopted numeric criteria for nutrients — primarily nitrogen and phosphorous — in Florida lakes, springs, and streams (including rivers). These cases, which have been consolidated for case-management purposes, present a series of challenges to the Administrator’s actions. Some parti