⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

4 opinions for “Hazelton v. Instant Brands LLC”

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014-12-22 · Published · cited 0× · 73 F. Supp. 3d 507; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176080; 2014 WL 7338751
MEMORANDUM MALACHY E. MANNION, District Judge. Pending before the court are the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, (Doc. 15), and the plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment, (Doc. 17). Upon consideration of the motions and related materials, the defendants’ motion for summary judgment will be granted and the plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment will be denied.
District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2012-10-26 · Published · cited 0× · 905 F. Supp. 2d 923; 2012 WL 5331293; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153943
*929 ORDER JANE MAGNUS-STINSON, District Judge. Presently before the Court in this employment matter are a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, [dkt. 18], and a Motion for Sanctions, [dkt. 23], both filed by Defendants Metropolitan School District of Decatur Township (“MSD”), Donald Stinson, Susan Adams,1
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2006-07-24 · Published · cited 0× · 71 Fed. Cl. 393; 2006 U.S. Claims LEXIS 206; 2006 WL 2055882
OPINION BUSH, Judge. Plaintiff Rotech Healthcare Inc. (Rotech), a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Orlando, Florida, filed this pre-award bid protest action on April 19, 2006. Rotech is the incumbent supplier of home oxygen equipment to the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (the VA). In this lawsuit, Rotech challenges the VA’s decision to award four future contracts for
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2024-05-03 · Published · cited 0×
FILED ORDERED PUBLISHED MAY 3 2024 SUSAN M. SPRAUL, CLERK U.S. BKCY. APP. PANEL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: