Cases

NO. 07-04-0554-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL C DECEMBER 12, 2005 ______________________________ JOHN SCOTT and HAZEL SCOTT,

210 F.3d 573 (5th Cir. 2000) In The Matter of Gibraltar Resources, Inc., doing business as Resources International Group, Debtor.SCOTT UNDERWOOD ADAM, Marvin Barish; Alan I. Becker; Glenn T. Bell; Stephen Bruce; O.L.Burrage; F. Herman Coleman; Robert S. Crandall; Lorraine P. Crandall: Clyde J. Dods; Robert G. Farris; Jack F. Fox; hazel A. Green; Lewis Johnson; E. Thomas W. Nesbitt; Richard Norton; Duane Seaman; Charles Sebastian; Dale E Stockin

*677 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN, Senior District Judge. This matter is presently before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment [docket entry 96]. Plaintiff has filed a response brief and defendant has filed a reply. Pursuant to E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(f)(2), the court shall

303 F.Supp.2d 753 (2004) Bobby E. HAZEL Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, Respondent. Nos. CIV.A.97-633-AM, CRIM.A.93-62-A. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. February 11, 2004. *755 United States, Pro se. MEMORANDUM OPINION ELLIS, District Judge. This pro se

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-02-074 CV ____________________ IN T

391 F.Supp.2d 707 (2005) Sharifah SCOTT-RILEY, Plaintiff, v. MULLINS FOOD PRODUCTS, INC., and William Mullins, Defendants. No. 04 C 1368. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. October 3, 2005. *708 *709 *710

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER HAROLD H. GREENE, District Judge. Plaintiff, M. Spiegel & Sons, Inc., brings this case to appeal from a final decision and order issued by the Department of Energy’s (“DOE”) Office of Hearings and Appeals (“OHA”) denying, in part, plaintiffs application for restitution in a proceeding initiated pursuant to the Petroleum Overcharge Distribution and Restitution Act, 15 U.S.C. §

861 P.2d 954 (1993) 116 N.M. 273 STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eldridge GREEN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 20251. Supreme Court of New Mexico. September 21, 1993. *955 Sammy J. Quintana, Chief Public Defender, Sheila Lewis, Appellate Defender, Santa Fe, for appellant. Tom Udall, Atty. Gen

375 F.Supp.2d 626 (2005) UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. Mary SCOTT, Plaintiff, v. METROPOLITAN HEALTH CORPORATION, d/b/a Metropolitan Hospital, a Michigan corporation, and Michael Faas, an individual, jointly and severally, Defendants. No. 1:02-CV-485. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division. June 23, 2005. *62

614 F.Supp. 1086 (1985) MUSEBECK, Barbara by MUSEBECK, Hazel Guardian-ad-litem v. HECKLER, Margaret, Secretary, Dept. of Health & Human Services, United States of America. Civ. A. No. 84-1997. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. August 2, 1985. *1087 Nancy Schuster, Bristol, Pa., for plaintiff. Rachel Shao

WALTER E. HOFFMAN, Senior District Judge: The plaintiff-appellant, Hazel H. Robinson, brought this individual employment discrimination action against the defendant-appellee, Montgomery Ward and Company, Inc. Robinson alleged violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 arising from the company’s decision to promote a white

281 N.W.2d 838 (1979) FARMINGTON PLUMBING & HEATING COMPANY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FISCHER SAND AND AGGREGATE, INC., Appellant, Wenzel Plumbing and Heating, Inc., and Hilite Electric Company, Respondents, Peoples Natural Gas Company, Defendant. No. 47835. Supreme Court of Minnesota. March 30, 1979. Rehearing Denied July 13, 1979.

HOGAN, Judge. This appeal is taken from two interlocutory orders in partition. The trial court determined the rights of the parties and ordered a sale as provided by Mo.R.Civ.P. 96.08. We affirm, emphasizing that we decide only this case upon its peculiar facts. In Appeal No. 13255, plaintiff Hazel Knowlton filed a petition for partition of three tracts of land. The first of the three parcels is a .9-acre

230 N.W.2d 604 (1975) Ell-Kay FOSS, Respondent, v. Kenneth MAHAL, et al., Appellants. No. 45219. Supreme Court of Minnesota. June 13, 1975. *605 Maun, Hazel, Green, Hayes, Simon & Aretz and Geoffrey P. Jarpe, St. Paul, for appellants. Moore, Costello & Hart and Larry A. Hanson, St. Paul, for respondent. Hear

226 N.W.2d 310 (1975) BELDEN PORTER COMPANY, Respondent, v. KIMBALL CO., INC., Appellant. No. 44708. Supreme Court of Minnesota. February 7, 1975. Maun, Hazel, Green, Hayes, Simon & Aretz, Merlyn C. Green, and Geoffrey P. Jarpe, St. Paul, for appellant. Wayne A. Pokorny, and Kenneth G. Schivone, Minnetonka, for respondent. Heard before PETERSON, TO

motion for Wood Appeals to certify.

211 N.W.2d 891 (1973) The 614 COMPANY, Appellant, v. D. H. OVERMYER CO., INC., Respondent. No. 43876. Supreme Court of Minnesota. October 19, 1973. Rehearing Denied November 23, 1973. *893 Leonard, Street & Deinard and Lowell J. Noteboom and James P. Gerlach, Minneapolis, for appellant. Maun, Hazel, Gr

ROBERT R. WELBORN, Special Judge. Appeal by defendants from order sustaining motion for new trial on behalf of one of two plaintiffs. The cause has been submitted here on the following stipulation: “This case arose in the Circuit Court of Missouri, Sixteenth Judicial Circuit in Jackson County, Missouri, from an automobile collision occurring at 23rd and 1-435, in Kansas City, Missouri.

MEMORANDUM OPINION GEORGE J. HAZEL, District Judge. This dispute arose after one of Plaintiffs’ employees resigned, started a competing business, and hired several of Plaintiffs’ employees. The former employers, Plaintiffs MedServ International, Inc., Endo-Surg Medical, Inc., and EndoCure Technologies, Inc. have brought this action against Defendants EndoMaster Medical, Inc., Tommy Leung, Paul

DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge. The job of a prison guard is not an easy one, as this ease illustrates. Herbert Wallace, a former guard at the Indiana State Prison, found himself assigned to duty in a cellhouse where a particularly violent inmate was housed, who had specifically threatened to kill Wallace. Athough the inmate did not succeed in carrying out his threat, he did attac