Cases

HAYNES, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-Appellant Mark Batton appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for attorneys’ fees in his Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) suit against the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). Because we conclude that Batton was eligible to receive attorneys’ fees, we VACATE and REMAND for proceedings consistent with this opinion. I. BACKGROUND We briefly reci

PER CURIAM: * Plaintiffs-Appellants Ana Garcia De Beck (“Ana”), AGB Enterprises, Incorporated (“AGB”), San Antonio Dental Management Group (“Dental Management”), and San Antonio Dental Laboratory (“Dental Lab”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and Third Party Defendants Robert Lee Beck (“Beck”) and JB Vega Corporation (“Vega”) appeal various aspects of the district court’s judgment (1) finding Beck l

292 F.Supp.2d 976 (2003) DUDLEY'S COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL COATING, INC., Plaintiff v. UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Commissioner of Revenue, Defendants. No. 3:02-0106. United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division. March 17, 2003. *977 *978 Mark Harrington Westla

ORDER GRANTING MOTION OF ABRAM & TRACY, INC FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT CHARLES M. CALDWELL, Bankruptcy Judge. A Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Memoranda in Opposition are before the Court. Abram & Tracy, Inc. (“Debtor”) seeks this relief. The Debtor is opposed by the State of Ohio Department of Taxation (“State”) and the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). The dispute is based

*234OPINION AFFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE BANKRUPTCY COURT BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE, SITTING BY SPECIAL DESIGNATION This matter is presently before the Court on Willie D. Lewis' appeal of the Bankruptcy Court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order overruling the debtor’s objection to the Internal Revenue Service’s proof of clai

235 B.R. 401 (1998) Lynn LYERLY, Appellant, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Appellee. No. 5:96CV36. United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Statesville Division. September 8, 1998. *402 R. Keith Johnson, Charlotte, NC, for plaintiff/petitioner. Thomas P. Holderness, Charlotte, NC, for defendant/respondent. <

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE’S AMENDED MOTION TO COMPEL UPRIGHT LAW TO RESPOND TO DISCOVERY REQUESTS SUZANNE H. BAUKNIGHT, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Several contested matters are pending before the Court concerning Law Solutions Chicago LLC dba UpRight Law LLC (“UpRight Law”) (see Mem. & Order entered Jan. 5, 2017 ['Wright Doc. 158]1). On

791 F.Supp. 19 (1992) Gilbert T. GONSALVES, Plaintiff, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, District Directors, Andover, Augusta, Philadelphia, and Paul Chinouard PRO Portland, Me., Defendants. Civ. No. 92-22-P-C. United States District Court, D. Maine. April 28, 1992. *20 Gilbert T. Gonsalves, pro se. David W. Newman, Tax Div., U

573 F.3d 947 (2009) HAYNES TRANE SERVICE AGENCY, INC., Plaintiff, and Frederick M. Haynes, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., d/b/a The Trane Company, Defendant-Appellee, Haynes Trane Service Agency, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, Frederick M. Haynes, Plaintiff, v. American Standard, Inc., d/b/a The Trane Company, Defendant-Appellee, Frederick M. Haynes, Plaintiff-Appellant, Haynes Trane Service Agency, Inc.,

As to Plain Green, Plaintiffs allege that the Haynes Defendants, in conjunction with other actors and through a web of entities, actually "funded and partially operated" the so-called "rent-a-tribe" scheme at the heart of this case. (Compl. ¶ 2.) Specifically, the Haynes Defendants and *909several non-tribal actors entered into a term sheet in support of the unlawful t

562 F.3d 1047 (2009) HAYNES TRANE SERVICE AGENCY, INC., Plaintiff, and Frederick M. HAYNES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., d/b/a The Trane Company, Defendant-Appellee, Haynes Trane Service Agency, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, Frederick M. Haynes, Plaintiff, v. American Standard, Inc., d/b/a The Trane Company, Defendant-Appellee, Frederick M. Haynes, Plaintiff-Appellant, Haynes Trane Service Agency, Inc.

Cite as 2023 Ark. App. 385 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CV-20-752 Opinion Delivered September 13, 2023 VICKY BASS HAYNES APPEAL FROM THE GARLAND APPELLANT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 26DR-07-1156] V.

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, FOR PUBLICATION August 12, 2021 Plaintiff-Appellee,

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, FOR PUBLICATION August 12, 2021 Plaintiff-Appellee,

Decisions of the Nebraska Court of Appeals 836 21 NEBRASKA APPELLATE REPORTS causation. Midwest’s assignment of error to the contrary is without merit. V. CONCLUSION We find no merit to Midwest’s assertions on appeal that the compensation court failed to provide a well-reasoned opinion under rule 11 and that the evidence was insufficient to demon- strate legal and medical causation. We affirm. Affirmed.

MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge Plaintiff James R. Haynes (“Haynes” or “Plaintiff’) brings this action pro se 1 against Defendant Navy Federal Credit Union (“NFCU” or “Defendant”), asserting a variety of claims arising out of a home mortga

729 N.W.2d 488 (2007) 477 Mich. 29 Gregory HAYNES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. NESHEWAT, Robert J. Murray, and Brian Peltz, Defendants, and Oakwood Healthcare, Inc. and Oakwood Hospital-Seaway Center, Defendants-Appellees. Docket No. 129206 (Calendar No. 4). Supreme Court of Michigan. Argued October 3, 2006. Decided March 28,

MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge. Plaintiff James R. Haynes (“Haynes”) brings this action pro se against Defendant Navy Federal Credit Union (“NFCU”), asserting a variety of claims concerning a home mortgage loan extended to him by NFCU. Currently before the Court is the [23] Motion for Preliminary Mandatory I

ZINTER, Justice (on reassignment). [¶ 1.] Mary Haynes appeals from a circuit court decision overruling a Department of Labor ruling that Haynes was permanently and totally disabled and entitled to workers’ compensation benefits. We affirm the circuit court. Facts and Procedural History [¶ 2.] Mary Haynes was diagnosed with mild mental retardation predating this case. Sh

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge. Plaintiff James R. Haynes (“Haynes”) brings this action against Defendant Navy Federal Credit Union (“NFCU”), asserting a handful of claims relating to a home mortgage loan extended to him by NFCU. 1