Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Hayes v. Fortner”
State of Tennessee v. Daryl Eugene Fortnerpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 11, 2004 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DARYL EUGENE FORTNER Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Montgomery County No. 40100012 Michael R. Jones, Judge No. M2003-00950-CCA-R3-CD - Filed June 25, 2004 Following a jury trial, the defendant was convicted of two counts of attem
Hayes v. Marriottpublic domain
HENRY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-appellant Willie T. Hayes appeals the district court’s dismissal of his complaint alleging that state prison officials violated his Fourth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights during a January 1991 search of inmates at the Arkansas Valley Correctional Facility. Because the record does not support the grant of summary judgment against Mr. Hayes on his Fourth Amendment claim, we reverse and
Hayes v. Marriottpublic domain
70 F.3d 1144 Willie T. HAYES, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Major MARRIOTT; Major Soares; Perry Roeker; Mr. Gaskil;Richard Mar, Assistant Superintendent; and themembers of the special OperationsResponse Team of January 24,1991, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-1181. United States Court of Appeals,Tenth Circuit. Nov. 20, 1995.
Fortner v. Connellpublic domain
367 Mich. 146 (1962) 116 N.W.2d 37 FORTNER v. CONNELL. Docket No. 63, Calendar No. 49,467. Supreme Court of Michigan. Decided July 2, 1962. Murray & Murray (Henry C. Murray, of counsel), for plaintiff. Colombo, Colombo, Colombo & Vermeulen, for defendant. SOURIS, J. This is a suit for a $5,000
Fortner v. Eldorado Springs Resort Co.public domain
THE plaintiffs, who are resident freeholders in Eldorado Springs (which they call a town, and which the defendants say is a summer resort), in Boulder county, brought this action to enjoin the defendant resort company and its officers from constructing a fence or gate across, or in any way obstructing, "Canon avenue extended", one of the alleged streets of Eldorado Springs on which the plaintiffs reside, and which they say has been by the resort company and its predecessors in interest set as
533 F.3d 780 (2008) CENTER FOR BIO-ETHICAL REFORM, INC.; Paul Kulas; Thomas Padberg, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT; Leroy D. Baca, in his official capacity as Sheriff; Xavier R. Aguilar, individually; Xavier R. Aguilar, in his official capacity as Sergeant; Dave Despot, individually; Dave Despot, in his official capacity as Deputy; Mark Darling, individually; Mark Darling, in his official capacity as Deputy; Mark
Jackson v. the Statepublic domain
Ray, Judge. Kerry Montel Jackson was charged with one count of trafficking in marijuana in violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act. Following a bench trial, he was found guilty and sentenced to 25 years, with the first 12 to be served in confinement. Prior to trial, Jackson filed a motion to suppress, which was denied. Jackson now appeals the denial of his motion for n
Crider v. the Statepublic domain
Peterson, Judge. Troy Crider appeals from a jury verdict finding him guilty of trafficking in methamphetamine and possession of drug-related objects. He argues that (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress; (2) the evidence is insufficient to sustain his trafficking conviction; (3) the trial court erred in not giving certain jury instructions; and (4) the trial
Wallace v. the Statepublic domain
Miller, Judge. Following a jury trial, Nathaniel Wallace was convicted of a single count of felony theft by shoplifting (OCGA § 16-8-14). Wallace appeals from the denial of his motion for a new trial, contending that the trial court erred in improperly commenting on the evidence at trial in violation of OCGA § 17-8-57; failing to charge the jury that Wallace acted independently fr
Stuckey v. Statepublic domain
NAHMIAS, Justice. Appellant Dominique Javonte Stuckey was convicted of malice murder and first-degree arson after he killed his grandmother, Velma Stuckey, and set her and her house on fire. In this appeal, he claims that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance in four ways. None of those claims has merit, and we affirm.1 *7
Johnson v. Statepublic domain
KAREN R. BAKER, Associate Justice hOn April 20, 2016, a Mississippi County-Circuit Court jury convicted appellant, Daniel Curtis Johnson, of first-degree murder and found that he had used a firearm in the commission of that murder. 1 Johnson was sentenced to life imprisonment and fifteen years’ imp
Todd v. Statepublic domain
ROBERT J. GLADWIN, Chief Judge | Appellant Michael Todd appeals the revocation of his suspended imposition of sentences (SIS) by the Hempstead County Circuit Court. He does not challenge the preponderance of the evidence supporting his revocation; rather, he argues that the circuit court erred when it opted to run his sentences consecutively rather than c
State v. Sharifipublic domain
[Cite as State v. Sharifi, 2019-Ohio-1837.] COURT OF APPEALS DELAWARE COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO, : JUDGES: : Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J. Plaintiff - Appellee : Hon. John W. Wise, J. :
Johnson v. Statepublic domain
Cite as 2017 Ark. 206 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-16-719 DANIEL CURTIS JOHNSON Opinion Delivered March 30, 2017 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE MISSISSIPPI V. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, CHICKASAWBA DISTRICT
JONATHAN L. v. Superior Courtpublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1076 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1077 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NO
Ochoa v. Koppelpublic domain
SALARIO, Judge. Laura Ochoa appeals a final judgment entered. after the trial court ruled that Donna Koppel timely accepted a proposal for settlement that Ms. Ochoa served pursuant to section 768.79, Florida Statutes (2013), and Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442. She asserts that Ms. Koppel failed to accept the proposal during the thirty-day period provided for in rule 1.442
Nielsen v. Sioux Tools, Inc.public domain
870 F.Supp. 435 (1994) Borge NIELSEN, Plaintiff, v. SIOUX TOOLS, INC., Defendant. Civ. No. 3:93CV152 (AVC). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. September 30, 1994. *436 *437 James S. Twaddell, Reed D. Rubinstein, Levy & Droney, P.C., Farmington, CT, R. Bartley Halloran, Alfano, H
Hillcrest Natural v. DEQpublic domain
12/13/2022 DA 22-0142 Case Number: DA 22-0142 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2022 MT 240 HILLCREST NATURAL AREA FOUNDATION, INC., JOEL E. GUTHALS, ANN M. GUTHALS, MARC VISCHER, ELLEN KNIGHT, ROSS WAPLES, and VIRGIN
Tomball Texas Hospital Company, LLC D/B/A Tomball Regional Medical Center v. La Neta Bobingerpublic domain
Opinion issued August 13, 2019 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00361-CV ——————————— TOMBALL TEXAS HOSPITAL COMPANY, LLC D/B/A TOMBALL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, Appellant V.
Jenkins v. University of Minnesotapublic domain
PERRY, District Judge. Stephanie Jenkins brought this sexual harassment suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the University of Minnesota, David Andersen, and Ted Swem. After the district court denied Swem’s motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity, he appealed. This Court has jurisdiction over this interlocutory appeal. We affirm the district court’s