Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Hayes v. Dish Network Service, LLC”
Warnick v. Dish Network LLCpublic domain
ORDER DENYING CLASS CERTIFICATION AND OBJECTIONS AND MOTIONS TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF’S EXPERTS Wiley Y. Daniel, Senior United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Seth Warnick is a consumer of cellular telephone services who complains about pre-recorded “roboealls” received from Defendant DISH Network LLC [“DISH”] on his cellular telephone without his prior express consent. In h
Krakauer v. Dish Network L.L.C.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CATHERINE C. EAGLES, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on a motion for class certification filed by the plaintiff, Thomas Krakauer. (Doc. 47.) Dr. Krakauer is a member of the proposed classes and has demonstrated that the members of the proposed classes are ascertainable. Dr. Krakauer’s claims are typical of class members, common questions of law and fact
Moore v. Dish Network L.L.C.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT GINA M. GROH, District Judge. Currently pending before the Court are Plaintiff Chester Moore’s Renewed Motion *642for Partial Summary Judgment [EOF 107] and Defendant DISH Network L.L.
Intercon Solutions, Inc. v. Basel Action Networkpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER VIRGINIA M. KENDALL, District Judge. Plaintiff Intercon Solutions, Inc. is a California-based provider of e-recycling services that operates an e-recycling facility in Illinois. Defendant Basel Action Network (“BAN”) is a non-profit Seattle-based corporation that certifies businesses that provide e-recycling services. Inter-con alleges that BAN and its founder an
Charvat v. EchoStar Satellite, LLCpublic domain
630 F.3d 459 (2010) Philip J. CHARVAT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ECHOSTAR SATELLITE, LLC, Defendant-Appellee. No. 09-4525. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: December 8, 2010. Decided and Filed: December 30, 2010. *460 ARGUED: John W. Ferron, Perron & Associates, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellan
Philip Charvat v. EchoStar Satellite, LLCpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 10a0397p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X - PHILIP J. CHARVAT,
130 F.Supp.2d 712 (2001) WAINWRIGHT'S VACATIONS, LLC v. PAN AMERICAN AIRWAYS CORP. No. CIV. CCB-99-1145. United States District Court, D. Maryland. February 8, 2001. *713 *714 Stuart M. Salsbury, Leslie Hayes Russo, Israelson, Salsbury, Clements and Bekman, LCC, Baltimore, MD, Robert M. Beckma
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Arguetapublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER P. K. HOLMES, III, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Currently before the Court are Defendant / Third-Party Plaintiff Silvia Argue-ta’s first motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. 12), second motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. 15), and third motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. 18); Plaintiff J & J Sports Productions, Inc.’s (“J & J”) motion to strike pa
Cindy Garcia v. Google, Inc.public domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CINDY LEE GARCIA, No. 12-57302 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:12-cv-08315- MWF-VBK GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware Corporation; YOUTUBE, LLC, a California limited liability company, OPINION Defendants-Appellees,
Ung v. Universal Acceptance Corp.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RICHARD H. KYLE, United States District Judge In this action, Plaintiff Spencer Ung alleges that Defendant Universal Acceptance Corporation (“Universal”) made unauthorized calls to his cell phone, in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227 et seq. Presently before the Court is Ung’s Motion for Class Certification. For the reasons that
Stephen C. Wynn v. BNSF Railway Companypublic domain
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District STEPHEN C. WYNN, ET AL., ) ) Respondents, ) WD82387 ) v. ) OPINION FILED: )
Kristensen v. Credit Payment Servicespublic domain
Order Denying Motions to Dismiss and Granting Motion for Class Certification ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge. I. BACKGROUND Flemming Kristensen (“Kristensen”) filed a class action claiming that Credit Payment Services (“CPS”), a payday lender formerly known as MyCashNow.com, marketed its services to him by causing its agents to send an unauthorized text message to his cell phone. The a
Manriquez v. DeVospublic domain
SALLIE KIM, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiffs move the Court for a preliminary injunction returning to the status quo ante by requiring the Department of Education *1085to process certain non-discharged federal student loan debt in accordance with the "Corinthian Job Placement Rate Rule." Defendant Elisabeth Devos, Secretar
Lula Williams v. Matt Martorellopublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 21-2116 Doc: 60 Filed: 01/24/2023 Pg: 1 of 43 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-2116 LULA WILLIAMS; GLORIA TURNAGE; GEORGE HENGLE; DOWIN COFFY; MARCELLA P. SINGH, Administrator of the Estate of Felix M. Gillison, Jr., on behalf of themselves and
Neal v. Duke Energypublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Bridgette Neal appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispe
Wells Fargo Insurance Services USA, Inc. v. McQuatepublic domain
AMENDED ORDER1 RAYMOND P. MOORE, United States District Judge ' This matter is before the Court Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment *1094(“Motion”) (EOF No. 57) on Plaintiff Wells Fargo Insurance Services USA, Inc.’s (“Wells Fargo”) claims arising from allegations that Defendants engaged in wrongful conduct, des
Campbell v. Facebook Inc.public domain
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, United States District Judge On March 16, 2016, plaintiffs’ motion for class certification came on for hearing before this court. Plaintiffs Matthew Campbell and Michael Hurley (“plaintiffs”) appeared through their counsel, Michael Sobol, Hank Bates, David Rudolph, and Melissa Gardner. Defendant Faeebook, Inc. (“de
Carr v. Tadin, Inc.public domain
ORDER: (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT; AND (2) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES, COSTS, AND INCENTIVE AWARDS (ECF Nos., 43, 40) JANIS L. SAMMARTINO, District Judge. Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs Jennell Carr and Phyllis Sierra’s (“Plaintiffs,” or, “Class Representatives”) Motion for an Order Granting Fi
Virginia Duncan v. Xavier Becerrapublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT VIRGINIA DUNCAN; RICHARD LEWIS; No. 19-55376 PATRICK LOVETTE; DAVID MARGUGLIO; CHRISTOPHER D.C. No. WADDELL; CALIFORNIA RIFLE & 3:17-cv-01017- PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC., a BEN-JLB California corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, OPINION v. XAVIER BECERRA, in his offic
People v. Trumppublic domain
People v Trump (2025 NY Slip Op 04756) People v Trump 2025 NY Slip Op 04756 Decided on August 21, 2025 Appellate Division, First Department MOULTON, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.