⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Hawley v. Board of Trustees for the Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority”

Supreme Court of the United States · 2023-06-29 · Published · cited 189× · 600 U.S. 181
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 600 U. S. Part 1 Pages 181–411 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 29, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998-12-07 · Published · cited 26× · 162 F.3d 195; 29 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20405; 15 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1285; 47 ERC (BNA) 1939; 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 30995
162 F.3d 195 47 ERC 1939, 29 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,405 UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. Jonathan STEVENS, qui tamand as relator, Plaintiff-Appellee,United States of America, Intervenor,v.The STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES, Defendant-Appellant. Docket No. 97-6141. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued Fe
District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1979-12-19 · Published · cited 6× · 485 F. Supp. 671; 14 ERC (BNA) 1013; 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7885
485 F.Supp. 671 (1979) GLENWILLOW LANDFILL, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF AKRON, OHIO, et al., Defendants. HYBUD EQUIPMENT CORPORATION et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF AKRON, OHIO, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. Nos. C78-65A, C78-1733A. United States District Court, N. D. Ohio, E. D. December 19, 1979. *672
Nevada Supreme Court · 1947-06-20 · Published · cited 10× · 182 P.2d 146; 64 Nev. 292; 1947 Nev. LEXIS 54
OPINION The United States attorney for the district of Nevada, pursuant to the direction of the attorney general of the United States, on January 21, 1947, appearing in his proper person, filed in this court a paper or document entitled, "Suggestion of the Interest of the United States in the Matter in Litigation and Motion for Leave to Appear and to Participate in the Litigation for the Protection of the Interest of the Unite
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1920-06-25 · Published · cited 9× · 223 S.W. 786; 205 Mo. App. 207; 1920 Mo. App. LEXIS 96
Plaintiff, a fraternal order, brought this suit in equity, in the circuit court of the city of St. Louis, on September 26, 1916, against one Dalzell and *Page 215 the Grand Avenue Bank. The petition alleged, in substance, that defendant Dalzell, on April 1, 1915, and continuously thereafter, was employed as "Section Secretary of Section 331" of the respondent order, in the city of St. Louis, and that his duties were, among other things, to collect premium
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018-01-31 · Published · cited 67× · 881 F.3d 75
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued May 24, 2017 Decided January 31, 2018 No. 15-1177 PHH CORPORATION, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, RESPONDENT On Petition for Rehearing En Banc Theodore B. Olson argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2012-09-28 · Published · cited 44× · 480 B.R. 708
MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING: (1) PLAINTIFFS’ OBJECTION TO DISCHARGE UNDER 11 U.S.C. § 727(a); and (2) DEFENDANTS’ COUNTERCLAIM AGAINST PLAINTIFFS, JERRY CAROOM AND MARY CAROOM PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. § 362(k) [Adv. Docket Nos. 1 & 10] JEFF BOHM, Chief Judge. I. Introduction It would be a gross understatement to characterize the dispute in this adversary proc
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018-01-31 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued May 24, 2017 Decided January 31, 2018 No. 15-1177 PHH CORPORATION, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, RESPONDENT On Petition for Rehearing En Banc Theodore B. Olson argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs
Supreme Court of Alabama · 2015-03-03 · Published · cited 22× · 200 So. 3d 495; 2015 WL 892752
PER CURIAM. The State of Alabama, on relation of the Alabama Policy Institute (“API”), the Alabama Citizens Action Program (“ACAP”), and John E. Enslen, in his official capacity as Judge of Probate for Elmore County, seeks emergency and other relief from this Court relating to the issuance of marriage licenses to same-sex couples. Named as respondents are Alabama Probate Judges Alan L. King (Jefferson County), Robert M. Mart
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2004-09-30 · Published · cited 1× · 366 F. Supp. 2d 698; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27640; 2004 WL 3273021
366 F.Supp.2d 698 (2004) State of WISCONSIN, Plaintiff, v. THE STOCKBRIDGE-MUNSEE COMMUNITY and Robert Chicks, Defendants. No. 98-C-0871. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. September 30, 2004. *699 John S Greene, Assistant Attorney General, Wisconsin Department of Justice, Madison, WI, for Plaintiff.
Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2011-04-01 · Published · cited 352× · 61 So. 3d 507; 2011 La. LEXIS 706; 2011 WL 1205136
CLARK, Justice.1 | i>This matter comes before the court pursuant to four writ applications filed by the plaintiffs, consolidated here for review. At issue are questions of fact and law *526arising in tort and contract causes of action. In the trial court, the Louisiana Commissioner of Insurance filed three separate la
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2014-07-11 · Published · cited 21× · 850 N.W.2d 403; 44 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20162; 2014 WL 3377072; 2014 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 79
CADY, Chief Justice. In this appeal, we decide two issues concerning the qualifications of persons who serve state government on commissions that engage in rulemaking. First, we must decide whether an Iowan who served on a commission was disqualified to vote on the adoption of a rule and regulation when she engaged in activities in her employment in support of the rule. Second, we must decide whether a rule adopted by a comm
Wilson v. Garciapublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1985-04-17 · Published · cited 4169× · 85 L. Ed. 2d 254; 105 S. Ct. 1938; 471 U.S. 261; 1985 U.S. LEXIS 1; 53 U.S.L.W. 4481
471 U.S. 261 (1985) WILSON ET AL. v. GARCIA No. 83-2146. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 14, 1985 Decided April 17, 1985 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT *262 Bruce Hall argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Diane Fisher an
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-01-30 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 01-12-00578-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS
Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler) · 2015-11-19 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 12-15-00219-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 11/19/2015 8:06:13 PM
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1981-06-24 · Published · cited 13× · 12 B.R. 321; 1981 Bankr. LEXIS 3490; 7 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1336
12 B.R. 321 (1981) In the Matter of George E. MORRIS and Angelika Mercer Morris, et al., Debtors. George E. MORRIS and Angelika Mercer Morris, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ASSOCIATES FINANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy Nos. 79 B 39137, 80 A 63. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. June 24, 1981. *322 Robe
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2011-09-28 · Published · cited 3× · 459 B.R. 757; 2011 Bankr. LEXIS 3808; 2011 WL 4542674
459 B.R. 757 (2011) In re BFW LIQUIDATION, LLC, f/k/a Bruno's Supermarkets, LLC, Debtor. No. 09-00634-BGC-11. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama, Southern Division. September 28, 2011. *760 Charles L. Denaburg, Najjar Denaburg PC, Derek F. Meek, John Richard Lehman, II, Marc P. Solomon, Burr & Forman
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-02-23 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4243321 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS