Cases

ORDER APPROVING CONSENT JUDGMENT AND CERTIFYING SETTLEMENT CLASS LANCE M. AFRICK, District Judge. Before the Court is the joint motion1 for approval of the proposed consent judgment2 filed by plaintiffs, LaShawn Jones et al. (“Class Plaintiffs”), intervenor plaintiff, the United States of America (“United States”) (collectively, “Plainti

SARAH SALLEY * NO. 2024-C-0494 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL R B LAWS BUILDERS, LLC, * DANA BAUMER WIFE FOURTH CIRCUIT OF/AND RENE BAUMER, ABC * INSURANCE COMPANY, AND STATE OF LOUISIANA XYZ INSURANCE COMPANY ******* APPLICATION FOR WRITS DIRECTED TO

Case: 21-30072 Document: 00516377733 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/30/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 30, 2022

OPINION OF THE COURT HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge. Swaleh Muiruri appeals his judgment of conviction, arguing that the District Court committed reversible error when it admitted hearsay testimony into evidence. We agree that the trial court erred in this regard and that these errors were not harmless. Since Muiruri had been incarcerated for some eight years, on April 22, 2009, the day after oral argument, we v

OPINION OF THE COURT HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge. Swaleh Muiruri appeals his judgment of conviction, arguing that the District Court committed reversible error when it admitted hearsay testimony into evidence. We agree that the trial court erred in this regard and that these errors were not harmless. Since Muiruri had been incarcerated for some eight years, on April 22, 2009, the day after oral argument, we v

JANE J. BOYLE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion

233 S.W.3d 13 (2007) Clarence ABRAHAM, et al., Appellants v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellee. No. 14-06-00419-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). June 28, 2007. Rehearing Overruled August 23, 2007. *16 U. Lawrence Boze, Houston, TX, and Richard P. Kinnan, Los Angeles, CA, for appellants.

Affirmed and Opinion filed June 28, 2007 Affirmed and Opinion filed June 28, 2007. In The Fourteenth Court of A

936 P.2d 1330 (1997) 130 Idaho 88 STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Alvin D. REUTZEL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 21799. Court of Appeals of Idaho. March 10, 1997. Rehearing Denied May 6, 1997. *1333 Van G. Bishop, Canyon County Public Defender, Nampa, for appellant. Alan G. Lan

894 P.2d 1096 (1995) Gerald Laran COOPER, Appellant, v. Garlanda PARKER-HUGHEY, M.D., Appellee. No. 79863. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. April 11, 1995. Gerald L. Cooper, McAlester, pro se. Robert H. Mitchell and Johnny J. Akins, Robert H. Mitchell & Associates, Oklahoma City, for appellee. *1097 SIMMS, Justice:

731 F.Supp.2d 603 (2010) ADVOCACY CENTER FOR the ELDERLY AND DISABLED, et al. v. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HOSPITALS, et al. Civil Action No. 10-1088. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. August 9, 2010. *604 Marjorie Press Lindblom, Adam T. Humann, Emily C. Lee, Maura Martin Klugman, Kirkland & Ellis, LLP,

Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge MICHAEL wrote the opinion, in which Judge GOODWIN joined. Judge TRAXLER wrote a dissenting opinion. OPINION MICHAEL, Circuit Judge. Ethel Louise Hill sued her former employer, Lockheed Martin Logistics Management, Inc. (Lockheed), claiming that she was fired because of her sex and age and that she was reprimanded and ultimately fired in

384 P.2d 236 (1963) Charles C. FINUCANE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VILLAGE OF HAYDEN, Gerald Kilian, Grant Jones, John Freligh, Gene Lyden and Lyle Petersen, Trustees of the Village of Hayden, Defendants-Respondents. No. 9304. Supreme Court of Idaho. August 2, 1963. *237 E. L. Miller, Charles H. Kimball, Coeur d'Alene, for appellan

On Rehearing. By the WHOLE COURT. O’NIELL, J. Of the several defenses urged against this suit, is one which was not discussed in the original opinion, but which Appears to be an absolute bar to the plaintiffs’ action. They are the direct descendant heirs, the forced heirs, of Jabish Griffing and his wife by first marriage, Marian Harrison Griffing. The land sued for belonged to th

WILBUR, Circuit Judge. The appellant is the voluntary liquidating agent of the Consolidated National Bank of Tucson, appointed in pursuance of the provisions of R.S. § 5220, 12 U.S.C.A. § 181, by vote of two-thirds of the stockholders of the bank. The resolution appointing appellant was passed April 15, 1935, and on that day he gave the ap-pellee notice that he rejected and recognized no further liability under a lease hereina