Cases

308 Ga. 831 FINAL COPY S19G0499. DALY et al. v. BERRYHILL et al. PETERSON, Justice. Shane Berryhill fainted and fell out of an eighteen-foot deer stand while hunting five days after undergoing major heart surgery. Berryhill and his wife (collectively “plaintiffs”) sued his surgeon, Dr. Dale Daly, and Savannah Cardiology (collectively “defendants”), claiming Daly’s negligent prescribing caused him to faint. The trial court instructed the jury on assumption of risk

JOSEPH F. BIANCO, District Judge: Plaintiff Joseph Miracolo ("plaintiff") commenced this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3) of the Social Security Act on February 18, 2015, challenging the final decision of the Acting Commissioner of Social Security (the "Commissioner")1

316 F.3d 777 Michael R. HAWKINS; David A. Hennenflow; Jacqueline L. Springer; Larry D. Johnson; Robert A. Wescott; Tracy L. Clevenger; William J. Fields; Maria E. Morrison; Todd M. Herdman; Nancy J. Johnson; Dana L. Huffman, Appellees,v.Gary HOLLOWAY, Appellant. No. 01-3336. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: May 13, 2002.

703 So.2d 250 (1997) STATE of Mississippi v. Anthony Mark BERRYHILL a/k/a "MOP". No. 95-KA-00289-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. October 23, 1997. Michael C. Moore, Attorney General, Marvin L. White, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Leslie S. Lee, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellant. Terry Lynn Wood, Corinth, for appellee. Before PRATHER, P.J., a

HANSEN, Circuit Judge. Nine plaintiffs 2 who worked at various times for the Ray County, Missouri, Sheriffs Department brought this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Sheriff Gary Holloway. Plaintiffs allege that Sheriff Holloway threatened to shoot several of them with his loaded handguns and that the sheriff inappropriat

492 So.2d 288 (1986) Bob Lee BERRYHILL, v. STATE of Mississippi. CC No. 2477. Supreme Court of Mississippi. July 23, 1986. Paul S. Funderburk, Tupelo, for appellant. Edwin Lloyd Pittman, Atty. Gen. by Wayne Snuggs, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee. En Banc. ON MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL ROY NOBLE LEE, Presiding Justice, for

*264OPINION By the Court, Ducker, J.: This is an action on a promissory note. For convenience of reference we will speak of the parties as plaintiff and defendant. Pursuant to a motion, judgment on the pleadings was rendered in favor of plaintiff for the principle sum, with interest thereon and costs, from which defendant appeals.

CLARK, Circuit Judge, specially concurring. ' I concur that the one issue discussed in the majority opinion correctly disposes of the case. However, I believe that affirming the district court upon one of the other issues will avoid the errors of the second trial and avoid another grant of the writ. Excessive pretrial publicity can deny a defendant of his right to be tried by a fair and

LEWIS, J. In 1883 Samuel D. Lord, having acquired tax titles to certain premises which had belonged, to William G-. Whitacre, brought an action in the district court to quiet his title thereto, and judgment was entered adjudging Lord to be the owner thereof. A certified copy of this judgment was recorded in the office of the register of deeds on October 8, 1883, and in April, 1885, Lord sold the property to one Martin, an inno

BARNES, Presiding Judge, concurring fully and specially. I concur fully with the majority opinion, which holds that the “two dismissal” rule set forth in OCGA § 9-11-41 (a) (3) must be applied when an action seeking recovery on the same claim is brought and dismissed twice, irrespective of the parties named as defendants. While this case is controlled by Belco Electric v. Bush, 204 Ga. App. 811, 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DON ALBERT PAYNE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 22-00869 (RC) ) XAVIER BECERRA et al.,

02/26/2025 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs August 1, 2024 JUSTIN ZACHERY CONNERS v. KELLY SUZANNE HAHN Appeal from the Chancery Court for Williamson County No. 19CV-48608 Joseph A. Woodruff, Judge _____________________________

Justice GINSBURG delivered the opinion of the Court. *1577This case concerns 8 U.S.C. § 1324, which makes it a federal felony to "encourag[e] or induc[e] an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ___________________________________ ) MONIQUE CECILIA DAVIS, ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) Case No. 20-cv-2282 (CKK) KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ) Acting Commissioner of ) the Social Security Administration, )

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOHNNIE FUSON, No. 23-15747 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:21-cv- 08237-DJH v. OFFICE OF NAVAJO AND HOPI OPINION INDIAN RELOCATION, an Administrative Agency of the United States, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ___________________________________ ) MARY M. GIORDANO RUPPERT, ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) Case No. 20-cv-3725 (CKK) KILOLO KIJAKAZI,1 ) Acting Commissioner of ) the Social Security Administration, )

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN D. RAINEY, Senior District Judge. Bradley Koenning (“Koenning”), Brian Martin (“Martin”), and Morgan Ryals (“Ryals”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) are three disabled young adults who allege that they require custom power wheelchairs with integrated standing features (“mobile standers”) to meet their medical, functional, and mobility needs. Defendant Thomas Suehs, Executive

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) MARK B. 1, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 22-cv-1080 (GMH) ) MARTIN O’MALLEY, ) Commissioner of

*802 COMBS, V.C.J.: PROCEDURAL HISTORY {1 At issue here is the constxtutlonahty of various provisions of three general appropriation bills enacted in 2012 through 2014. On July 29, 2015, the Appellant (Reynolds) filed an amended petition

657 F.3d 876 (2011) POTRERO HILLS LANDFILL, INC.; BLT Enterprises of Sacramento, Inc.; Brentwood Disposal Service, Inc.; Concord Disposal Service, Inc.; Contra Costa Waste Service, Inc.; Discovery Bay Disposal, Inc.; Oakley Disposal Service, Inc.; Pittsburg Disposal and Debris Box Service, Inc.; Rio Vista Sanitation Service, Inc.; Waste Connections, Inc.; Waste Connections of California, Inc., DBA El Dorado Disposal Service; Trashpros, LLC; West Coast Re