Cases

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan May 21, 2012 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice 144772

HAWKINS, Chief Justice, for the Court: The Town of Winstonville has appealed a judgment of the Chancery Court of the second judicial district of Bolivar County placing it under a permanent injunction and finding it in violation of a preliminary injunction previously issued by the court on behalf of Demco Distributing Company and others. Because the chancery court, having prior thereto dismissed the cause as a

955 S.W.2d 921 (1997) FLOYD COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION; Stephen Towler, Superintendent; Eddie Patton, Member; Hattie C. Owens, Member; Robert Isaac, Member; and Brent Clark, Member, Appellants, v. Wayne RATLIFF; Tommy Thompson; and Pete Grigsby, Appellees. No. 95-SC-1095-DG. Supreme Court of Kentucky. November 20, 1997. *922 Cliff

232 S.E.2d 492 (1977) 32 N.C. App. 429 In the Matter of Hattie HOGAN. No. 7627DC641. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. March 2, 1977. *494 Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Associate Atty. Isaac T. Avery, III, Raleigh, for the State. Asst. Public Defender Larry B. Langson, Gastonia, for respondent-appellant

94 B.R. 526 (1988) In re Isaac & Aza BROWN, Raul P. Morales, Thresia A. Florence, Donna M. Groebe, Clint & Carolyn M. Jones, Eddie L. Loyd, Major & Hattie Roberson, Debtors. Bankruptcy Nos. 88 B 17914, 88 B 02217, 88 B 02218, 88 B 03051 and 88 B 03341-88 B 03343. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. October 18, 1988.

585 S.E.2d 87 (2003) 262 Ga. App. 252 DBL, INC. v. CARSON et al. No. A03A0522. Court of Appeals of Georgia. June 11, 2003. Reconsideration Denied July 10, 2003. Certiorari Denied November 10, 2003. *89 H. Lehman Franklin, Jr., Statesboro, Elizabeth A. Branch, Atlanta, for

645 S.E.2d 56 (2007) DBL, INC. v. CARSON et al. Holcomb v. Carson et al. Nos. A06A1726, A06A1727. Court of Appeals of Georgia. March 26, 2007. Reconsideration Denied April 12, 2007. *58 H. Lehman Franklin Jr., for appellant. Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Isaac Byrd, Deputy Attorney Gener

HERLANDS, District Judge. This is an action for refund of taxes paid for the calendar year 1948. The material facts are stipulated.1 On the *621question of law which remains, both sides move for summary judgment. That question of law may be stated as follows: On a sale in 1948 of depreciable property (

411 F.Supp.2d 813 (2006) Dennis MICHAEL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Margarette GHEE, et al., Defendants. No. 3:01 CV 7436. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division. February 1, 2006. *814 *815 Norman L. Sirak, Cleveland, OH, Peter J. Wagner, Toledo, OH, for Plaintiff Dennis Michae

703 F.Supp. 1398 (1988) YAMAHA CORPORATION OF AMERICA et al., Plaintiffs, v. ABC INTERNATIONAL TRADERS, CORP., et al., Defendant(s). No. CV 86-7892-RSWL. United States District Court, C.D. California. December 23, 1988. *1399 Robert R. Thornton, Zobrist & McCullough, Los Angeles, Cal., Robert E. Wagner, Linda A. Kuczma, Walle

Lionel K. Legge, Acting Associate Justice: In this action for partition and sale of a tract of thirty-one acres in Williamsburg County appeal is from a decree of the Honorable James Hugh McFaddin, Judge of the Third Judicial District, adjudging the defendant Marie S. Scott to be the sole owner of said land. It is undisputed that the land in question, located in the Dutch Neck section of Williamsburg County,

MEMORANDUM OPINION NORMAN K. MOON, District Judge. Plaintiffs, all prisoners residing at Flu-vanna Correctional Center for Women (“FCCW”), a facility of the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Corrections (the “VDOC”), filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that Defendants violated Plaintiffs’ constitutional rights under the Eighth Amendment to be free from cruel and unusual puni

The appeals and cross-appeals on this record present questions in relation to the validity of the contract of *Page 583 purchase of voting machines for use, pursuant to the terms of chapter 94 of the Acts of 1937, in the primary and general elections to be held in Baltimore City, a political division of the state. The employment of voting machines in primary and general elections was controlled until 1937 by sections 222-224 of article 33 of the Co

Burch, J. (dissenting): The writer was not satisfied with the original opinion. Under the stress of circumstances he was not able to write anything, and neglected to see to it that he was marked as dissenting. In order that the significance of the decision may be appreciated, the story of the case should be told. It is told in the findings of the district court. Omitting those which are formal, the fin

108 S.E.2d 26 (1959) 250 N.C. 77 Flora Trudy MOORE (Widow), Carrie Moore and husband, et al., v. Daniel LEWIS and wife, Lillie Lewis, et al. No. 174. Supreme Court of North Carolina. April 8, 1959. *27 Taylor & Mitchell, Raleigh, for defendant-appellant. Clark, Clark & Grady, Elizabethtown,

BAILEY BROWN, Circuit Judge. After being dismissed from her position as Floyd County's Head Start Director, Sidney Jane Bailey filed a section 1983 action against the Floyd County Board of Education, individual members of the Board in their official capacities,1 Dr. Stephen Towler both as an individual and in his official capacity, and Big Sandy Area Community Action Program, Inc. (Big Sandy) for a

*683The opinion of the court was delivered by Harvey, J.: This is an action for a mandatory injunction to compel the defendant to move that portion of her building which plaintiff alleges is situated in one of the principal streets of the city. The trial court made findings of fact and rendered judgment for defendant. Plaintiff has appealed.

Hattie House and her husband brought this suit against Isaac Williams and Andrew J. Bailey, in trespass to try title and to partition certain real estate. The plaintiffs alleged and proved, that Hattie House and Isaac Williams were married to each other in 1878; that Isaac Williams purchased the property in controversy after said marriage, and that in April, 1883, at the suit of Williams, a judgment of divorce was rendered dissolving the bonds of matrimony between them, but not disposing of t

Hattie O. Cooney filed suit against John B. Dandridge and Spencer B. Pugh, appellees, to recover upon four promissory notes executed by the appellees, one of the notes payable to order of Amelia Wolcott, two payable to order of Myra Wolcott, and one payable to order of Nellie Byrud, alleging that she was the legal owner and holder of the notes. Appellees in their answer to the merits averred that on April 19, 1911, the notes sued upon were the property of John Wolcott, Amelia Wolcott, Myra Wo

106 F.3d 135 115 Ed. Law Rep. 650, 12 IER Cases 773 Sidney Jane BAILEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.FLOYD COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, by and through its members;Stephen TOWLER, individually and in his official capacityas Superintendent of the Floyd County Schools; Big SandyArea Community Action Program, Inc.; Eddie Billips, as amember of the Floyd County Board of Education; Brent Clark,as a membe