Cases

201 F.Supp.2d 700 (2002) ADAMS, Harry, Agney, Robert N., Aker, Brenda A., Aker, John R., Akers, Allen, Akers, Geneva, Albert, Jane, Albert, Larry K., Albert, Ryoks B., Alderman, Mitchell, Alexander, Claborne, Alger, Gloria, Alley, Randsom D., Allison, Harold, Altizer, Clinton, Amos, Sparrell, Anders, Richard, Andrews, Gene F., Austin, John, Bane, Lewis, Beasley, Ellen M., Bell, Benjamin H., Bell, William A., Bishop, Billy M., Blake, Robert C., Boland, Fe

321 F.Supp.2d 1118 (2004) In re: BAYCOL PRODUCTS LITIGATION Edwin Ronwin v. Bayer Corp. Chester T. Hennington, et al. v. Bayer Corp., et al. Kevin Hughes v. Bayer Corp., et al. Luberta Lawson, et al. v. Bayer Corp., et al. James Richardson v. Bayer Corp., et al. Donald Randall v. Bayer Corp., et al. Mary Bynum, et al. v. Bayer Corp., et al. Willard Watts v. Ba

191 F.Supp.2d 1292 (2002) HOUSEHOLD BANK, f.s.b., Plaintiff, v. JFS GROUP, et al., Defendants, H & R Block, et al., Plaintiffs/Intervenors. No. CIV.A. 01A1405N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. March 8, 2002. *1293 *1294 Stewart M. Cox, Andrew J. Noble, II

348 S.C. 340 (2001) 559 S.E.2d 327 Wannelle HEDGEPATH, Andrew Hedgepath, and Kristin Hedgepath, Appellants/Respondents, v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, a corporation, AT & T Nassau Metals Corporation, Respondents/Appellants, and Gaston Copper Recycling Corporation, and Southwire Company, Respondents. Karen Mack as Personal Representative of the Estate of Toby L. Sharpe, Sr., Appellant/Respondent,

63 Cal.Rptr.3d 82 (2007) 41 Cal.4th 1038 162 P.3d 596 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Lamar BARNWELL, Defendant and Appellant. No. S055528. Supreme Court of California. July 26, 2007. *85 Michael J. Hersek, State Public Defender, under appointment by the Supreme Court, Jay

DAVIS, District Judge. These matters are before the Court upon the Plaintiffs’ motions for relief from parts 1(A) and 1(B) of PTO No. 114, which require that Plaintiffs submit either a case-specific expert report from a medical expert attesting that Baycol caused the plaintiff injury or a letter and supporting documents, followed by a case-specific expert report, that identifies and highlights the medical records, samples

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2823-16 PHOENIX PINELANDS CORPORATION, a New Jersey Corporation, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION Plaintiff-Respondent, April 29, 2021 APPELLATE DIVISION v

29 Ill. App.3d 546 (1975) 331 N.E.2d 148 EDNA CORNUE et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. EDWARD T. WEAVER, Director of the Illinois Department of Public Aid, et al., Defendants-Appellants. No. 58933. Illinois Appellate Court — First District (2nd Division). May 27, 1975. Rehearing denied July 22, 1975. William J. Scott, Attorney

Roe, C.J. This cause coming on to be heard on the joint stipulation of the parties hereto, the Court being fully advised in the premises, finds; That the multiple-party group of Claimants listed herein consists of 540 Claimants seeking individual judgments of varying amounts. These claims, in the aggregate amount of five hundred ninety thousand six hundred thirty-four do

AFFIRMED. This is an appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court reversing an order of the court of domestic relations for Multnomah County adjudging Bertha Maxine Baldwin, a dependent child and committing her to the Boys' and Girls' Aid Society of Oregon. Upon appeal to the Circuit Court there was a trial de novo, but there was no court reporter present and the testimony of the witnesses, as incorporated in the bill of exceptions, is in narrative form. From this record, which is unsat

The opinion of the court was delivered by Hutchison, J.: This appeal involves the construction of the provisions of a will mainly in two particulars: (1) whether it authorizes an equitable conversion; and (2) whether the estates in remainder are vested or contingent. Because the will in question provides for a sale of the property of the deceased after the termination of the life estate and

On July 27, 1925, the Prosecuting Attorney of Greene County filed in the criminal court of said county, a verified information which, omitting formal parts, reads as follows: "H.T. Lincoln, Prosecuting Attorney within and for the County of Greene, in the State of Missouri, under his oath of office informs the court that J.D. Wallace, late of the County and State aforesaid, on the 7th day of March, A.D. 1924, at the County of Greene and State of Missouri, did then and there under and by

215 F.Supp.2d 795 (2002) In re NORPLANT CONTRACEPTIVE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. MDL No. 1038. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. August 14, 2002. *796 *797 Christopher Matthew Parks, Parker & Parks, Port Arthur, TX, for Plaintiffs. F. Lane Heard III, Williams

Haselton, J. This was an appeal by the contestants from a decree of the probate court for the district of Addison allowing a certain instrument, with three alleged codicils thereto, as the last will and testament of Columbus Smith, late of Salisbury, who died November 10, 1909, at the age of 89 years, leaving an estate, conceded, for the purposes of the trial, to amount to $340,000.00, a substantial part of which was real estate.

ACCEPTED 01-15-00556-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/21/2015 10:14:05 PM CHRIST

ACCEPTED 14-15-00882-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/28/2015 8:14:08 PM CHRISTOPHER

ACCEPTED 01-15-00571-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/24/2015 9:45:33 PM CHRIST

410 F.Supp. 770 (1975) A. C. SHERRILL, Plaintiff, and Robert H. Costner et al., Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. J. P. STEVENS AND COMPANY, INC., Defendant. Civ. A. No. C-C-73-12. United States District Court, W. D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division. November 11, 1975. *771 *772

NlMS, Judge: In these consolidated cases, respondent determined aggregate deficiencies in excess of $61 million in petitioners’ Federal income taxes for the years 1975 through 1980.2 Each of the petitioners in these cases entered into a series of transactions herein sometimes referred to for convenience as the London Options Transaction. Th