Cases

597 F.3d 895 (2010) Rich STOCKWELL, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF HARVEY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 09-2355. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued October 28, 2009. Decided March 12, 2010. *898 Kenneth N. Flaxman (argued), Chicago, IL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants. Julie A. Bruch,

681 F.Supp. 206 (1988) Norman KAMERMAN, Plaintiff, v. Saul STEINBERG, Reliance Group Holdings, Inc., Reliance Group, Inc., Reliance Financial Services Corp., and Reliance Insurance Company, Defendants. Norman KAMERMAN, Plaintiff, v. Saul STEINBERG, Reliance Group Holdings, Inc., Reliance Group, Inc., Reliance Financial Services Corp., Reliance Insurance Company, and Walt Disney Productions, Inc., Defendants. Shirley BROWN and Edwa

141 B.R. 587 (1992) In re MARILYN STEINBERG ENTERPRISES INC. t/a Maternity Mart and Warehouse, Debtor. Mitchell W. MILLER, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Marilyn STEINBERG, Jerome Bercun, and Philadelphia National Bank, incorporated as CoreStates Bank, N.A., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 91-12726F, Adv. No. 91-1055F. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. June 17, 1992.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jeffrey K. Oing, J), entered June 21, 2011, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment in her favor, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Even if defendant’s acts or omissions rose to the level of negligence, plaintiffs legal malpractice claims remain specu

People v Harvey (2022 NY Slip Op 01885) People v Harvey 2022 NY Slip Op 01885 Decided on March 17, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 4

STEINBERG, Judge: The appellant veteran, James R. Harvey, appeals a September 21,1992, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) denying him basic eligibility for educational assistance benefits under chapter 30 of title 38, United States Code, the “All Volunteer Force Educational Assistance Program” [hereinafter “GI Bill of 1984” or “New GI Bill” or “NGIB”]. The veteran has filed an informal brief urging the

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jeffrey K. Oing, J), entered June 21, 2011, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment in her favor, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Even if defendant’s acts or omissions rose to the level of negligence, plaintiffs legal malpractice claims remain specu

NEBEKER, Chief Judge: This case presents for review a December 28, 1990, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) decision which denied appellant’s claim for entitlement to service connection for malignant lymphoma. Upon consideration of the pleadings and the record on appeal, we affirm the Board’s decision and hold that appellant has failed to present a well-grounded claim. Appellant served on active du

225 B.R. 646 (1998) In re BEN FRANKLIN RETAIL STORES, INC., et al. Jay A. STEINBERG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Robert A. KENDIG, David Brainard, Abbey J. Butler, Melvyn J. Estrin, Harvey A. Fain, Alfred H. Kingon, William A. Lemer and C. Wayne Pyrant, Defendants. Bankruptcy Nos. 96 B 19482, 96 B 19489, 96 B 19493, 96 B 19494, 96 B 19501 and 96 B 19497, Adversary No. 7 A 1339. United States Bankruptcy

650 S.E.2d 268 (2007) STEINBERG v. The STATE. No. A07A0312. Court of Appeals of Georgia. June 25, 2007. Reconsideration Denied July 9, 2007. *269 William C. Head, Head, Thomas, Webb & Willis, Atlanta, for appellant. Leslie C. Abernathy, Solicitor-General, Amy Millard Radley, Assistant Solicitor-General

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: Chief Judge DesmoNd and Judges Fuld, VaN Voorhis, Burke, Sgileppi, Bergan and Keating.

753 N.E.2d 293 (2001) 196 Ill.2d 444 257 Ill.Dec. 98 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. Phillip HARVEY, Appellant. No. 89522. Supreme Court of Illinois. June 21, 2001. *294 Daniel D. Yuhas, Deputy Defender, and Gary R. Peterson, Assistant Defender, Office of the State

MARCUS, Justice. Julian L. Steinberg, Charlotte Steinberg Gottesman and Jacqueline Steinberg Hoch-berg (Steinbergs) filed a petition seeking a preliminary and permanent injunction restraining Emile Meyers, Sr. and Emile Meyers, Jr. (Meyers) from blocking or otherwise interfering with the navigation of an unnamed canal which leads to a tract of land that the Steinbergs own in Plaque-mines Parish. Evidence

CHIEF JUSTICE HARRISON delivered the opinion of the court: Following a jury trial in the circuit court of Champaign County in 1985, defendant was found guilty of armed robbery (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 38, par. 18 — 2(a)) and sentenced to an extended term of 45 years’ imprisonment based on a previous conviction for attempted mur

Crew III, J. Appeal (transferred to this court by order of the Appellate Division, Second Department) from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Hickman, J.), entered March 20, 1990 in Orange County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a combined action for declaratory judgment and proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Maybrook finding that peti

560 F.Supp. 1040 (1982) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. William Joseph HARVEY, et al., Defendants. No. 82-73-Cr-SMA. United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division. August 30, 1982. On Motion to Vacate Restraining Order February 14, 1983. *1041 *1042

20 Cal.App.2d 124 (1937) SAMUEL H. STEINBERG, as Trustee, etc., Appellant, v. H. M. EVANS et al., Respondents. Civ. No. S. California Court of Appeals. C. 24. April 2, 1937. Philip N. Krasne, Leon Kaplan, Frederick Lamken and Benjamin J. Goodman for Appellant. W. I. Gilbert for Respondents. Desmond, J., pro tem. The plaintiff brought suit f

Fuld, J. Plaintiffs own a plot of land, substantially unimproved, in the County of Queens, New York City, consisting of about ten acres, with an abandoned gas station on one corner. In 1947, one of plaintiffs’ predecessors in title (and we hereafter refer to plaintiffs or their predecessors as “ the landlord ”) leased the property to the individual defendant for use as a golf driving range at a rental of $4,000 a year. The lease,

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs-appellants Bernard A. Schlifke and Harvey Kallick commenced this securities fraud suit against several defendants, including Seattle-First National Bank, 1 alleging that the defendants violated the federal securities laws in connection with the sale of limited partnership interests in

McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge. Appellant James Harvey Bradley, Jr. appeals from a judgment entered by the district court 1 denying his amended petition for writ of habeas corpus. The effect of this judgment is to uphold the decision of the United States Parole Commission (Commission or Parole Commission) revoking appellant