Cases

JOHN T. CURTIN, District Judge. In Third Amended Complaint “A” in this case (Item 247), plaintiffs M.O.C.H.A. Society Inc. (“MOCHA”) and seventeen employees and/or former employees of the City of Buffalo Fire Department claim that the Fire Department’s drug testing policy, in effect between approximately 1995 and 2005, was implemented, applied and enforced in a manner designed to intentionally discriminate against African Amer

204 P.3d 390 (2009) Ivo QUEIROZ, an unmarried man, Plaintiff-Counterdefendant/Appellant, v. Daniel HARVEY, Defendant-Counterplaintiff/Appellee. No. 1 CA-CV 07-0309. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B. May 15, 2008. Review Granted January 6, 2009. *391 Gust Rosenfeld P.L.C. By Charles W. Wirken,

236 P.3d 1220 (2010) STATE of Arizona, Appellant, v. Harvey Ray ROPER, Appellee. No. 1 CA-CR 09-0447. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department C. August 12, 2010. Richard M. Romley, Acting Maricopa County Attorney By Linda Van Brakel, Deputy County Attorney, Phoenix, Attorneys for Appellant. Bruce Peterson, Office of the Legal Advocate By Frances J

463 F.Supp.2d 716 (2006) Chong H. KIM Plaintiff, v. Francis J. HARVEY, Secretary of the Army, Defendant. Civil Case No. 04-60005. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. November 15, 2006. *717 *718 *719 Kenneth F. Neuman, Leif K. An

961 F.2d 1441 John V. REITZ; Judith MacDonald; Dale R. Peterson; EarlD. Riddle; Jack E. Evans; Harlan C. Selby; Robert E.Johnsen; Perry Coleman; Nickolas J. Madesh; Robert A.Graham; Jerry E. Marks, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.LEASING CONSULTANTS ASSOCIATES; William McKenna; RichardA. Heitmeyer; Richard D. Wellbrock; William B. Ward, etal.; Global Computer Corporation; Ronald Johnson; TexcomEquipm

*451 BLACKMUN, Circuit Judge. Two brothers, Carl Harvey Bistram and Arthur Earl Bistram, appeal in forma pauperis from an order of the district court denying their joint motion for relief, under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a), with respect to an indic

Redick, District Judge. This is an original action instituted in this court by the state, on the relation of Charles W. Taylor, as superintendent of public instruction of Nebraska, against George E. Hall, as treasurer of the state of Nebraska, respondent, praying that a peremptory writ of mandamus issue to said respondent requiring him to countersign and pay a warrant dated April 1, 1935, regularly issued by the auditor of pu

LAY, Chief Judge. Janice M. Cleland, executrix of her first husband’s estate, appeals from a judgment of the district court dismissing her wrongful death suit against the United States. The decedent, Merlyn C. Godber, died February 13, 1980, in an airplane crash near Hot Springs, South Dakota, when flying as a passenger in a plane piloted by Charles M. Largent, III. The airplane was owned by Fall River Feedlots, Inc. (Feedlo

Goss, C. J. On a trial to the court judgment was rendered against William T. Thompson, former city treasurer, and American Surety Company, of New York, surety on his official bond, for principal and interest found due upon the unpaid balance of city deposits made by the treasurer in Farmers State Bank of Cozad when that bank was in*80solvent, and while Thompson was adm

Rose, J. This is an application by Joseph F. Kaspar, relator, for a peremptory writ of mandamus commanding Frank Lehmkuhl, as county clerk of Saunders county, respondent, to include in the printed forms of ballots for the election to be held November 6, 1934, party circles in which any elector may vote a straight party ticket by making a cross in a circle. Relator is a candidate for state senator and is a

Per Curiam. This is an action based upon a promissory note executed by defendant Rodman and delivered to John W. Getchell, *866Sr. The district'court for Kimball county found in favor of defendants and plaintiff has appealed. We have carefully examined the record and find it to be free from prejudicial error. The judgment of the district court is th

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the State of Nebraska denied.

Redick, District Judge. This is an original action instituted in this court praying that a peremptory writ of mandamus issue ordering *700the respondent t'o countersign and pay a state warrant issued to relator for his salary as judge of the supreme court of the state of Nebraska. The petition alleges that the relator was duly elected a judge of the

CANT, District Judge. The parties will be designated as in the court below where the Bankers’ Savings & Loan Association of Omaha, Neb., was plaintiff and American Surety Company of New York was defendant. Plaintiff is a corporation, and during the times herein referred to.was engaged in carrying on a building and loan association business at Omaha, Neb. Eor years, one A. D. Touzalin was a trusted employee of plaintiff,

14 F.2d 524 (1926) WESTCHESTER FIRE INS. CO. OF NEW YORK v. NORFOLK BUILDING & LOAN ASS'N. No. 7375. Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. August 2, 1926. Matthew A. Hall, of Omaha, Neb. (Raymond G. Young and Harvey M. Johnsen, both of Omaha, Neb., on the brief), for plaintiff in error. M. S. McDuffee, of Norfolk, Neb. (Donald D. Mapes, of Norfolk, Ne

27 F.2d 314 (1928) CALKINS v. F. W. WOOLWORTH CO.[*] No. 7900. Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. May 18, 1928. *315 Raymond G. Young, of Omaha, Neb. (Matthew A. Hall and Harvey M. Johnsen, both of Omaha, Neb., on the brief), for plaintiff in error. F. H. Stinchfield, of Minneapolis, Minn., and Henry Mons

It is ordered that the Honorable Harvey M. Johnsen, Senior Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, be, and he is hereby appointed Special Master in this case in place of the Honorable Sam E. Whitaker, resigned. The Special Master shall have authority to fix the time and conditions for filing of additional pleadings and to direct subsequent proceedings, and authority to summon witnesses, issue subpoenas, and take such evidence a

OPINION Harvey Brown, Justice TMX Finance Holdings, Inc. (TMX-Holdings), an out-of-state holding company, appeals the denial of its special appearance. The trial court denied the special appearance based on its finding that TMX-Holdings was an alter ego of a related entity—also a holding company—that had submitted to the court’s jurisdiction. In two issues, TMX-Holdings argues that an alte

NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE. IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE IN RE REYNALDO P. No. 1 CA-JV 18-0058 FILED 8-2-2018 Appeal fr

*292¶1 The common enemy rule, which allows landowners to repel surface waters to the detriment of their neighbors, does not apply when the landowner obstructs a watercourse or natural drainway or when the landowner obstructs riparian water from entering a flood channel. Currens v. Sleek, 138 Wn.2d 858, 862-63, 983 P.2d 626, 993 P.2d 900 (1999); Sund v. Keating, 43 Wn.2d 36, 42-43,