Cases

Hines, Presiding Justice. This is an appeal in a class action challenging a 2011 City of Atlanta (“City”) ordinance (“Ordinance”) and the consequent amendment (“Amendment”) by the City of its three defined benefit pension plans (“Plans”), i.e., the City’s General Employees’ Pension Plan; the City’s Police Officers’ Pension Plan; and the City’s Firefighters’ Pension Plan; the Ord

157 Ga. App. 354 (1981) 277 S.E.2d 338 OWEN et al. v. CITY OF ATLANTA. 60976. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided February 4, 1981. Gene Burkett, for appellants. J. M. Harris, Marva Jones Brooks, Irmina Rivero Owens, for appellee. CARLEY, Judge. Appellants are homeowners and residents living in close proxim

Clarkson, J., dissenting: The facts substantially agreed upon in the submission of controversy succinctly are as follows: On 11 September, 1920, the defendant, city of Wilmington, purchased from the United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation, a large tract of land located near the southern boundaries of the city, partly within the city limits, and partly without, and on the river front. The deed co

601 F.2d 809 INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS OF ATLANTAet al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Reginald EAVES, Atlanta Police Department Commissioner,individually and in his official capacity,Defendant-Appellee. No. 77-1284. United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Aug. 30, 1979. Barry

Case Number: 05-96-01425-CV 12/30/1998 Case stored in record room 12/30/1998 Notice sent to Court of Appeals 12/03/1998 Petition for Review disposed proceeding denied 10/13/1998 Case forwarded to Court 10/09/1998 Response to Petition for Review waived 10/01/1998 Opinion from the Court of Appeals filed. 10/01/1998 Order from lower Court received and filed 09/23/1998 Petition for Review filed [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THERE

*661TACHA, Chief Judge. Petitioner-appellant Don Wilson Hawkins appeals the denial of habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2254, from his Oklahoma first-degree felony murder conviction and death sentence. Among other claims, Hawkins argues that the State improperly based his first-degree felony murder conviction on kidnapping for extortion, which is not a specificall

PRYOR, Circuit Judge: This appeal by Tanner Advertising Group, LLC, of an order that dismissed its challenge of the Fayette County Sign Ordinance of 1998 presents issues of mootness and standing. In 2003, Tanner applied for and was denied a sign permit because Tanner sought to construct signs that did not comply with section 1-43 of *780the Sign Ordinance. Fayette Cou

Case: 14-11853 Date Filed: 08/07/2015 Page: 1 of 62 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 14-11853 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 0:12-cv-60741-

MARCUS, Circuit Judge: Duty Free Americas, Inc. (“DFA”), which operates duty free stores in many international airports nationwide, appeals the district court’s dismissal of its multi-count suit against The Estée Lauder Companies, Inc. (“Estée Lauder”), the largest manufacturer of beauty products sold in duty free retail outlets in the United States. DFA claims that Estée Lauder

793 P.2d 866 (1990) Dale Austin SHELTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee. No. F-86-920. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. May 24, 1990. Irven R. Box and Diane Clowdus, Oklahoma City, for appellant. Robert H. Henry, Atty. Gen., William H. Luker, Asst. Atty. Gen., Oklahoma City, for appellee. *86

504 F.Supp.2d 825 (2007) Crosby Wilfredo ORANTES-HERNANDEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General of the United States, et al., Defendants. No. CV82-01107-MMM(VBKX). United States District Court, C.D. California. July 24, 2007. *826 Karen C. Tumlin, Linton Joaquin, National Immigration Law Center, Mark D. R

584 F.Supp. 1225 (1984) Dives RAY, Julian DeGruson, et al., Carl A. Wood, et al., Plaintiffs, v. W.S. DICKEY CLAY MANUFACTURING COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. Nos. 77-2200, 77-2201, 77-2251, 77-2252, and 79-2230. United States District Court, D. Kansas. April 19, 1984. *1226 Michael E. Callen, Callen, Sexton, Rajala & S

206 Cal.App.3d 140 (1988) 253 Cal. Rptr. 390 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DON V. HARBOLT, Defendant and Appellant. In re DON V. HARBOLT on Habeas Corpus. Docket Nos. D004696, D007610, D007933. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One. November 28, 1988. *143 COUNSEL

565 F.Supp. 674 (1983) Lloyd VEST, et al., Plaintiffs, v. George O. WARING, M.D., et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. C82-325A. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. May 31, 1983. *675 *676 Robert N. Meals, Jr., Meals & Parks, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiffs. Mesiro

542 P.2d 251 (1975) Wilfred POULIN, Appellant, v. Dr. Harvey ZARTMAN, Appellee. Dr. Harvey ZARTMAN, Cross-Appellant, v. Wilfred POULIN, Cross-Appellee. Nos. 2120, 2127. Supreme Court of Alaska. November 12, 1975. *255 Theodore R. Dunn and Warren W. Matthews, Jr. of Matthews, Dunn & Baily, Anchorage, James A. Parri

GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge: I. In this case we are asked to decide the constitutionality of a municipal ordinance that regulates the distribution of literature and solicitation of funds at airports owned by the city of Atlanta, Georgia. The International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc., (the Society) and William G. Ogle, president of the Society’s Atlanta Branch, claim that the ordinance violates the

323 F.Supp. 203 (1971) James B. BENNETT et al., Plaintiffs, and Carl A. Brown et al., Intervening Plaintiffs, v. Louis A. GRAVELLE, individually and in his capacity as Chairman (now Member) of the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission, Salvatore Barranca, individually and in his capacity as Vice-Chairman (now Chairman) of the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission, Peter R. Bozick, individually and in his capacity as a Member of the Washington

*CJP Supp. 85Opinion GROSSMAN, Chairperson. I. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY This disciplinary matter concerns Judge Kevin A. Ross of the Los Angeles County Superior Court. On August 30, 2004, the commission filed its first amended notice of formal proceedings against Judge Ross in which it charges Judge Ross with the fol

Hoke, J., after making the preliminary statement: Our legislation more directly pertinent to this controversy, C. S., ch. 21, secs. 1035, *221066-67-68, 1083-1090, 1097-1098-1100 et seq., confers upon tbe Corporation Commission power to make reasonable and just rates and charges to prevail as to intrastate traffic by certain designated public-service companies, inc