Cases

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM. We have carefully considered the record in this case and find that the grounds of appeal are without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

328 F.2d 992 Harold Hiram HARTNESS, Appellant,v.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 20554. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. March 20, 1964. Appeal from United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia; William A. Bootle, Chief Judge. John M. Hancock, Jr.,

DAVIS, Judge: The appellant, Robert A. Hartness, appeals from the May 5, 2004, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board or BVA) that, inter alia, denied his claim for a special monthly pension based on his status as permanently housebound. Both parties filed opening briefs and Mr. Hartness filed a reply brief. We will not consider Mr. Hartness’ claim for special monthly p

RICE, District Judge. The defendant United States of America filed herein its motion to dismiss, for the reason that the plaintiff’s action is barred by the statute of limitation and this court is without jurisdiction to hear said cause. Thereafter, the following stipulation was entered into by the attorneys. for plaintiff and defendant: “It is stipulated and agreed by counsel for respective sides that Clare

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

[Cite as State v. Hartness, 2019-Ohio-316.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 106810 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

HARRY T. EDWARDS, Circuit Judge, dissenting: At issue in this case is the degree to which the Government must justify its decision to subject holders of secret security clearances to random urinalysis testing. The Government contends that relevant case law establishes a per se rule permitting the testing of secret clearance holders, relieving it of the obligation to justify such testing on a case-by-cas

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

GWYNNE E. BIRZER, United States Magistrate Judge This matter is before the Court on United States' Motion for Clarification and Reconsideration *1309of Magistrate Judge's Order Setting Conditions of Release (ECF No. 11 ) and Defendant's Response (ECF No. 18). After careful consideration, the Court GRANTS the

PAMELA PEPPER, United States District Judge The grand jury returned a seven-count superseding indictment charging defendants *965Steven Lewis, Theresa Lewis and Demetra Hinkle with conspiring to distribute cocaine, firearm possession, possessing a firearm in furtherance of a drug offense, and maintaining a drug trafficking residence. Dkt. No. 3

ERIC F. MELGREN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE A grand jury indicted Defendant Patrick Stein with one count of possessing child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B). This matter comes before the Court on Stein's Motion to Suppress Evidence and Request for Franks hearing (Doc. 30). For the following reasons, the Court grants Stein's request for a Franks hearing and-after reviewing and considering th

McHUGH, Circuit Judge. Daniel Eugene Cookson pleaded guilty to two counts of possessing child pornography after the FBI identified him in the course of its large-scale sting operation involving the website "Playpen." At his sentencing hearing, the district court determined Mr. Cookson's criminal history and total offense level correlated to a Guidelines range of 97-121 months. The distr

FLOYD R. GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge. On April 1, 1987 Billy Hartness and Brenda Keener were found guilty in the district court 1 of conspiracy to defraud the United States in violation of U.S.C. 18 § 371 (1982). 2 Hartness was also found guilty of one count and

ERIC F. MELGREN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Jason Wayne Irving's Motion to Suppress (Doc. 18). Defendant seeks suppression of all evidence obtained against him pursuant to two search warrants. The second search warrant was based on the findings of the first search warrant. The Court finds that Defendant has standing to object to the search, the search warrant was overbroad, and the g

McKAY, Circuit Judge. Defendant Daederick Lacy was charged with three felony counts stemming from his prostitution of teenage girls. In Count 1, which related to a sixteen-year-old girl, he was charged with sex-trafficking of a minor in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1591

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Johnson v. United States, 576 U.S. ----,

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: In No. 17-7258, Mustafa Muhammad appeals the denial of his motion for recusal, and in No. 17-7430, he appeals the denial of his Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 motion for new trial. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.