Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) CAROLEE BRADY HARTMAN, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 77-cv-2019 (APM)

678 F.Supp. 312 (1988) Carolee Brady HARTMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Charles Z. WICK, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 77-2019. United States District Court, District of Columbia. January 19, 1988. As Amended January 29 and February 16, 1988. *313 *314 *315

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND TO CONDUCT ADDITIONAL CLASS DISCOVERY JAMES L. ROBART, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Before the court is Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a second motion for class certification and to engage in additional class-related discovery (Dkt. # 103). The court has considered the motion, all subm

676 N.E.2d 965 (1996) 286 Ill. App.3d 129 222 Ill.Dec. 1 MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, on its own Behalf and as Successor in Interest to Chicago and Eastern Illinois Railroad Company and to Texas and Pacific Railway Company and their subsidiary and affiliated companies, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN RE-INSURANCE COMPANY; American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania; Continental Casualt

Westminster Management, LLC, et al. v. Tenae Smith, et al., No. 4, September Term, 2023. LANDLORD-TENANT LAW – RESIDENTIAL LEASES – REAL PROPERTY § 8-401 – MEANING OF RENT Real Property Article § 8-401 allows a landlord to pursue the summary ejectment of a tenant from the leased premises upon a tenant’s failure to pay “rent.” The term “rent” as used in § 8-401 and applied to residential tenants means the fixed, periodic payments a residential tenant must pay for use or occupancy of a rented pr

347 F.Supp.2d 927 (2004) Richard BAUMGARDNER; et al., Plaintiffs, v. SMURFIT-STONE CONTAINER CORPORATION, a Missouri corporation, Defendant. Civil No. 04-730-JO. United States District Court, D. Oregon. December 2, 2004. *929 Thomas K. Doyle, Bennett Hartman Morris & Kaplan, LLP, Portland, OR, for Plaintiffs.

506 Submitted on the briefs June 3; peremptory writ of mandamus to issue immediately, in terms consistent with this opinion June 12, 2020 ELKHORN BAPTIST CHURCH, an Oregon nonprofit corporation; Calvary Chapel Newberg, an Oregon nonprofit corporation; Calvary Chapel Lincoln City, an Oregon nonprofit corporation; Calvary Chapel Southeast Portland, an Ore

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ADRIANN BORUM, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 16-1723 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 43 : BRENTWOOD VILLA

USCA4 Appeal: 25-2038 Doc: 48 Filed: 05/04/2026 Pg: 1 of 31 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-2038 LAUREN SPURLOCK; HEATHER SMITH; and SHAWN ZMUDZINSKI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs - Appel

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR RULE 23(b)(2) CLASS CERTIFICATION CLAUDIA WILKEN, United States District Judge Consolidated Plaintiffs and Jenkins Plaintiffs, current and former collegiate athletes, jointly move for certification of injunctive relief classes. Defendants, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and a group of Division I conferences, oppose the motion. After considering the parties’ subm

656 F.Supp.2d 1265 (2009) David SANDOVAL, Raul Coria, and all similarly situated persons, Plaintiffs, v. RIZZUTI FARMS, LTD., and John R. Rizzuti and Jane Doe Rizzuti, a marital community, Defendants. No. CV-07-3076-EFS. United States District Court, E.D. Washington. September 1, 2009. *1268 Candelaria Murillo, Tami L. Nida Arntz

MEMORANDUM OPINION Royce C. Lamberth, United States District Judge Pending before the Court are the plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification and Reinstatement of Findings of Liability and Order Granting Relief [358]; the plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend the First Amended Complaint [359]; and the defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdicti

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SARIS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION In these two proposed national class actions, plaintiffs San Francisco Health Plan (“SFHP”) and the Board of County Commissioners of Douglas County, Kansas (“Douglas County”) allege that McKesson Corporation engaged in a racketeering en*266terprise to raise t

OPINION OF THE COURT A. LEON HIGGINBOTHAM, Jr., Circuit Judge. These consolidated appeals arise out of class action litigation that is currently pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. In that suit, public and private elementary and secondary schools nationwide have sued former manufacturers and suppliers of asbestos-containing materials. The plaintiff schools

LYNCH, Chief Judge. Appellants, a small dissident group (“the Samsell plaintiffs”), are within a larger class of medical patient consumers in a case alleging fraud in overcharging for the medication Lupron. These plaintiffs, along with insurers and private *24health care providers, have achieved a major settlement agreement which was approved by the district court. The t

Coleman, J. — Two former employees of Farmer Bros. Co. sued the company, alleging that it unlawfully failed to pay them overtime wages. The issue on review is whether the trial court abused its discretion in granting the employees’ motion to certify a class that includes 29 members. We remand for reconsideration because the trial court failed to support its class certification decision with adequate reasoning, so it is un

64 P.3d 49 (2003) 115 Wash.App. 815 Larry MILLER and Michael Conrads, individually and on behalf of the Class, Respondents, v. FARMER BROS. CO., Appellant. No. 49506-2-I. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1. February 24, 2003. *52 Michael John Killeen, Michael Reiss, Jennifer Katherine Schubert, Jef

962 P.2d 919 (1998) STATE of Colorado; Gale Norton, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Colorado; Department of Revenue of the State of Colorado; Renny Fagan, in his official capacity as Executive Director, Department of Revenue; Dee Hartman, in his official capacity as Director, Division of Motor Vehicles, Department of Revenue; Larry D. Huls, in his official capacity as Assistant Director, Motor Vehicle Division, Department of

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SARIS, District Judge. INTRODUCTION In this proposed national class action, Plaintiffs allege that First DataBank, Inc. and McKesson Corporation engaged in a racketeering enterprise (the “Scheme”) to fraudulently state the “average wholesale price” (“AWP”) for numerous prescription pharmaceuticals beginning in late 2001, in violation of 18 U.S

70 P.3d 547 (2002) BUCKLEY POWDER CO., for itself and on behalf of similarly situated entities, Plaintiff-Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. STATE of Colorado; Gale Norton, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Colorado; Colorado Department of Revenue; Renny Fagan, in his official capacity as Executive Director, Department of Revenue; Dee Hartman, in his official capacity as Director, Division of Motor Vehicles, Department of