⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Hart v. Granado”

District Court, W.D. Texas · 2018-03-01 · Published · cited 14× · 290 F. Supp. 3d 627
KATHLEEN CARDONE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *629On this day, the Court considered Defendant Donostia LLC's Motion to Dismiss or Transfer the Case to the Northern District of Illinois ("Motion"). ECF No. 7. For the reasons set forth below, Defendant's Motion is DENIED . I. BACKGROUND
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018-03-23 · Published · cited 0×
07-17-00458CV ACCEPTED SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 3/23/2018 4:00 PM Vivian Long, Clerk APPELLATE NO. 07-17-00458-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FILED IN 7th COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICTAMARILLO, TEXAS
California Court of Appeal · 1978-07-07 · Published · cited 6× · 82 Cal. App. 3d 619; 147 Cal. Rptr. 384; 82 Cal. App. 2d 619; 43 Cal. Comp. Cases 757; 1978 Cal. App. LEXIS 1706
OPINION Petitioner filed a workers' compensation claim for disability resulting from a cerebrovascular accident suffered while employed as a deputy sheriff by the County of Orange. On the basis of the medical evidence and the presumption in Labor Code section 3212, the workers' compensation judge found that the injury arose out of and in the course of employment and made an award for 100 percent permanent disability without apportionm
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2023-05-25 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-21-00162-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG BROWNSVILLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellant, v. JASMIN LEAL Appellee.
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2011-07-14 · Published · cited 10× · 336 Wis. 2d 1; 2011 WI 75; 804 N.W.2d 458; 2011 Wisc. LEXIS 363
ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J. ¶ 105. (concurring). I agree with the majority that the circuit court improperly considered Jack's untimely motion after verdict, that Jay may no longer maintain a claim for judicial dissolution, and that benefit-estoppel doctrine does not preclude Jay from appealing the circuit court's decision to limit the evidence he could present in support of his breach of fiduciary duty claims.
Dilworth v. Tuckerpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2026-07-01 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 25-60414 Document: 56-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/01/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED
People v. Safranekpublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2025-07-30 · Published · cited 3× · 2025 IL App (4th) 240967
2025 IL App (4th) 240967 FILED July 30, 2025 NO. 4-24-0967 Carla Bender 4th District Appellate IN THE APPELLATE COURT Court, IL
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007-05-25 · Published · cited 11× · 537 F.3d 976; 233 F. App'x 724; 233 Fed. Appx. 724; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 12776; 2007 WL 5404597
537 F.3d 976 (2007) José Antonio HERNANDEZ-MENDOZA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent. No. 06-70926. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 8, 2007. Filed May 25, 2007. *977 Karen S. Chen, Esq., Bibianne U. Fell, Esq., Baker & McKenzie Wells Farg
District Court, D. Oregon · 2016-02-03 · Published · cited 3× · 160 F. Supp. 3d 1231; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12757; 2016 WL 427067
OPINION AND ORDER MOSMAN, United States Chief District Judge Cessante ratione legis, cessat ipsa lex. When the reason for the law ceases to exist, so, effectively, does the law. The usual setting for this maxim is regulatory law: when, for example, there is a reduced speed limit near a school, then if the school ceases to be a school the lower speed limit should end. But unless we are talking abo
Supreme Court of Kansas · 2025-02-28 · Published · cited 10× · 564 P.3d 725
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 124,348 CATHY L. STROUD, Appellant, v. OZARK NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. and STEPHEN I. GUINN, Appellees. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. K.S.A. 2024 Supp. 60-217 requires
Ortiz v. Quartermanpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007-10-10 · Published · cited 66× · 504 F.3d 492; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 23729; 2007 WL 2936244
504 F.3d 492 (2007) Ricardo ORTIZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Nathaniel QUARTERMAN, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent-Appellee. No. 06-70020. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. October 10, 2007. *493 *494 Robin Norris, Hart
District Court, D. Colorado · 2016-11-23 · Published · cited 18× · 220 F. Supp. 3d 1074; 2016 WL 6893149; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 162984
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF FLSA NOTICE AND FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION William J. Martinez, United States District Judge In this action, Plaintiff Venancio Torres-Vallejo brings claims against Defendants CreativExteriors, Inc., (“CE”) and its president, Jeffrey Miller (together, “Defendants”), on behalf of himself and a proposed class of similarly-situated landscape laborers who worked for Defendan
Avila v. Quartermanpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009-02-17 · Published · cited 259× · 560 F.3d 299; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 3520; 2009 WL 376974
560 F.3d 299 (2009) Rigoberto AVILA, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, v. Nathaniel QUARTERMAN, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent-Appellee-Cross-Appellant. No. 07-70028. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. February 17, 2009. *302 Chris K. Gober, Law O
District Court, District of Columbia · 2021-08-10 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WILLIAM YEAGER, II, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) Civil Action No. 20-cv-00755 (RC) ) NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO, et al., ) ) Defe
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010-05-11 · Published · cited 47× · 604 F.3d 596; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 9571; 2010 WL 1850519
604 F.3d 596 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Mark ADAMS, Appellant. No. 08-3920. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: December 16, 2009. Filed: May 11, 2010. *597 Kevin L. Schriener, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Thomas S. Rea, AUSA, St. Louis, MO, for appellee. B
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2020-03-24 · Published · cited 0× · 335 Conn. 174
**************************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of this opinion is the date the opinion was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. This opinion is subject to revisions and editorial changes, not of a substantive nature, and corrections of a tech
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2022-04-14 · Published · cited 0×
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-21-00227-CV ___________________________ LON SMITH & ASSOCIATES, INC., AND A-1 SYSTEMS, INC. D/B/A LON SMITH ROOFING AND CONSTRUCTION, Appellants V. JOE KEY AND STACCI KEY, Appellees O
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003-12-24 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _____________ No. 03-2080EM _____________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * On Appeal from the United v. * States District
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2009-05-28 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-08-160-CR JOSEPH MARTIN BELSON APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ------------ FROM THE 396TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004-01-22 · Published · cited 29× · 354 F.3d 731; 2003 WL 23009012
RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. John P. Bewig appeals from his conviction for conspiring to distribute a list I chemical, pseudoephedrine, having reasonable cause to believe the listed chemical would be used to manufacture a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(c)(2). He raises numerous arguments, including insufficiency of evidence, improper admissio