Cases

Before the Court in these products liability actions are consolidated Motions to Dismiss (Motions) filed by the Defendants C.R. Bard, Inc. (Bard), and Davol, Inc. (Davol) *Page 2 (collectively, the Defendants), against all of the above-named Plaintiffs.1 The Motions are based upon the doctrine of forum nonconveniens. The Plaintiffs have filed objections. Jurisdiction is pursuant to G.L. 1956 §

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-1626 ___________________________ Nancy Ann Burke, individually and as Personal Representative for the estate of David K Burke; Russell David Burke; Jeffrey John Burke; Katherine Elizabeth Burke; Victoria Jane Burke, llllllllllllllllll

James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, filed March 23, 2018 (Doc. 27)("MTD"). The Court held a hearing on August 10, 2018. The primary issues are: (i) whether the applicable statutes of limitations bar Plaintiff Janice Nowell's claims against Defendants Medtronic Inc., Covidien PLC, Covidien LP, and Medtronic PLC for negligence, strict

OPINION AND ORDER Dan Aaron Polster, United States District Judge Presently before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss of Defendants PPG Industries, Inc., PPG Architectural Finishes, Inc., and PPG Architectural Coatings, LLC (collectively, “Defendants” or “PPG”). (Doc #: 26 (“Motion”)). The Court notes that the Motion does not seek dismissal of all claims. Specifically, Defendants do not seek dismissal of

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ AMENDED MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge. On June 28, 2011, Robert Briseno filed a complaint against ConAgra;1 between Oc*938tober and December 2011, the court consolidated several cases filed against ConA-gra under the caption above

*546ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge. On June 28, 2011, Robert Briseno filed a complaint against ConAgra.1 Between October and December 2011, the court consolidated several eases filed against Co

LOURIE, Circuit Judge. Appellants (collectively, “EchoStar”) appeal from the district court’s decision finding EchoStar in contempt of two separate provisions of the court’s permanent injunction order. See TiVo Inc. v. Dish Network Corp., 640 F.Supp.2d 853 (E.D.Tex.2009). A panel of this court affirmed the district court’s decision, concluding that EchoStar had in fact violated the infringement provision of the perm

*1061ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ • MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION MARGARET M. MORROW, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On January 17, 2014, Ben Z. Halberstam filed this putative class action on his own behalf and on behalf of a class of similarly situated Californians against NJOY, Inc., and -Sottera, Inc. (collectively, “NJOY”).1

MEMORANDUM OPINION CONTI, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION........................................................152 II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY................................................155 III. STANDARD OF REVIEW................................................156 A. Rule 23 Requirements for Class Certification............................156 <

221 F.Supp.2d 623 (2002) Richard P. MAY v. ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC. No. Civ.A. WMN-01-3243. United States District Court, D. Maryland. August 29, 2002. *624 Howard J. Needle, Baltimore, MD, for Plaintiff. Joseph E. Santucci, Jr., Robyn B. Weiss, Morgan Lewis and Bockius LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendant. M

DECISION LOURIE, Circuit Judge. Northfield Corporation and Menasha Corporation appeal from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois holding that they infringed claim 1 of U.S. Patent 5,079,901 and claim 20 of U.S. Patent 5,588,280 under the doctrine of equivalents. Unique Coupons, Inc. v. Menasha Corp., No. 96-C-7532, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21744 (N.D.

147 F.Supp.2d 1085 (2001) William Wayne SINK, Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant. No. 00-2174-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. June 8, 2001. *1086 *1087 *1088 John Harl Campbell, David T. Holt, Campbell, Holt & Assoc., Kansas Ci

977 P.2d 103 (1999) Janet A. SEVILLE, Appellant, v. HOLLAND AMERICA LINE WESTOURS, INC., Appellee. No. S-8270. Supreme Court of Alaska. May 14, 1999. *104 Charles W. Coe, Anchorage, for Appellant. Robert P. Blasco, Robertson, Monagle & Eastaugh, Juneau, for Appellee. Before: MATTHEWS, Chief Justice, COMPTON, EAS

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. An accident in 1974 involving a railroad tank car and a chemical storage tank has led to years of environmental litigation and, ultimately, to this court’s consideration of those events almost a quarter century later. In June 1974, an engineer of the Providence and Worcester Railroad Company moved a group of railroad tank cars while one car was still attached

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS TO CERTIFY CLASSES MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge. On December 21, 2006, plaintiffs Nicola Edwards and James Schley filed an action in this court against defendant Toys “R” Us (“Toys”), alleging that it had violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq.1 Specifically, plaintiffs asserted that Toys had violated t

OPINION OF THE COURT (June 20, 2014) Hodge, Chief Justice. Appellant Gibson Charles appeals the Superior Court’s September 17, 2013 Judgment and Commitment, which adjud*828icated him guilty of several crimes including aggravated rape in the first degree, aggravated rape in the second degree, unlawful sexual contact in the f

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 10-2326 ___________ American Civil Liberties Union of * Minnesota, * * Plaintiff - Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States

620 F.3d 896 (2010) Robert BROOKS, Appellant, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellee. No. 09-3454. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: June 15, 2010. Filed: September 3, 2010. Chester Harris Lauck, III, argued, Brian M. Bowen, on the brief, Little Rock, AR, for appellant. Scott Harper Tucker, argued, Robert S. Shaf

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1780 MICHAEL STEVEN WIRTES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS, Defendant - Appellee, and NEWPORT NEWS POLICE DEPARTMENT (Government Agency), Chief of Police; RICHARD MYERS, Chief of Police (Individual); STACY KELLY, Assis

Appellate Case: 23-7057 Document: 87-1 Date Filed: 04/18/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 18, 2025