Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Harry J. Tobias”
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1209 On cross-motions for summary judgment, the superior court ruled that defendant City of Los Altos (Los Altos) was not obligated under Government Code sections 895 and 895.2 to pay money to plaintiff Authority for California Cities Excess L
United States v. Tobiaspublic domain
K.K. HALL, Circuit Judge: Stephen and Constance Tobias appeal an order of the district court awarding over $11,000 in costs and attorney’s fees to Harry and Jolene Johnson, under the common fund doctrine, after the Johnsons vigorously, though unsuccessfully, contested the Tobias’ title to part of a tract of land condemned by the United States. We reverse. I. In November, 1984, the Unit
Burns v. Bombela-Tobiaspublic domain
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and
United States v. Tobiaspublic domain
HARRISON L. WINTER, Circuit Judge: This case involves the doctrine of adverse possession. Stephen Craig Tobias and Constance S. Tobias appeal from an order of the district court granting judgment n.o.v. and in the alternative, a new trial, in favor of Harry I. Johnson, Jr. and Jolene T. Johnson (collectively “Johnson”). 696 F.Supp. 185. The Tobiases had intervened as claimants in an action brought by the United States agai
State v. Tobiaspublic domain
KLEES, Judge. STATEMENT OF THE CASE The defendants, Eugene Tobias and John W. Simmons, were indicted by a grand jury on December 3, 1981, for the second degree murder of Michael Henry. They were tried on June 15 and 16,1982, and found guilty as charged by a unanimous vote of the twelve member jury. Defendants were sentenced to life imprisonment, without benefit of probation, parole or suspension of senten
DELANCY v. Tobiaspublic domain
26 So.3d 77 (2010) Beverly DELANCY, Appellant, v. Andrew TOBIAS, Appellee. No. 3D08-2159. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. January 20, 2010. *78 Hoffman, Larin & Agnetti and David L. Perkins and John B. Agnetti, North Miami Beach, for appellant. Conroy, Simberg, Ganon, Krevans, Abel, Lurvey, Morrow
Tobias v. Ricepublic domain
379 S.C. 357 (2008) 665 S.E.2d 216 William and Elena TOBIAS, Respondents, v. Ruby RICE, Appellant. No. 4411. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. June 10, 2008. Heard March 6, 2008. Filed June 10, 2008. Rehearing Denied August 26, 2008. *359 Michael F. Tall
Terence Tobias Oliver v. State of Floridapublic domain
Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC12-1350 ____________ TERENCE TOBIAS OLIVER, Appellant, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. [April 6, 2017] PER CURIAM. This case is
Tobias v. Portuondopublic domain
367 F.Supp.2d 384 (2004) Jeffrey TOBIAS, Petitioner, v. Superintendent PORTUONDO, Respondent. No. 01-CV-6589. United States District Court, W.D. New York. August 26, 2004. *385 *386 Jeffery Tobias, Romulus, NY, pro se. Loretta S. Courtney, Monroe County District Attorney's Office, Roche
City of Pearsall v. Robert Tobiaspublic domain
ACCEPTED 04-15-00302-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 11/13/2015 6:46:32 PM
City of Pearsall v. Robert Tobiaspublic domain
ACCEPTED 04-15-00302-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 11/30/2015 7:00:18 PM
Tobias Chavez v. Dole Food Company Incpublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT __________ No. 13-4144 __________ TOBIAS BERMUDEZ CHAVEZ, et al., v. DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC., et al. (D. Del. No. 1-12-cv-00697) ____ JULIO ABREGO ABREGO, et al., v. DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC., et al. (D. Del. No. 1-12-cv-00698)
Whitehead v. Tobiaspublic domain
7 S.W.3d 658 (1999) Debra WHITEHEAD, Appellant, v. Victor TOBIAS and MS Carriers, Inc., Appellees. No. 06-98-00176-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Texarkana. Submitted July 1, 1999. Decided October 27, 1999. Opinion Overruling Rehearing December 2, 1999. *660 Joe B. Young, Patton, Nix & Young,
State v. J. Klinepublic domain
JUSTICE McKINNON delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Joshua James Kline (Kline) appeals from ajudgment and sentence entered by the Third Judicial District Court, Deer Lodge County, convicting him of criminal distribution of dangerous drugs, endangering the welfare of children, and incest. We affirm. ¶2 We restate the issues Kline presents f
Tobias v. FIRST ENERGY NUCLEAR OPERATING CO.public domain
302 F.Supp.2d 849 (2004) William J. TOBIAS, Plaintiff, v. FIRST ENERGY NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY, et al., Defendant. No. 3:02 CV 7589. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division. February 5, 2004. *850 John D. Franklin, Tracy Anne Lipinski, Law Office of John D. Franklin, Toledo, OH, for Plaintiff. Denise M.
Jemison v. Timptonpublic domain
TOBIAS, J., Concurs in the Result and Assigns Reasons. |,I respectfully concur in the result. The record does not disclose that the trial court abused its discretion in the trial of this matter. Further, the record does not reflect that the trial court was manifestly in error in its finding of fact or misinterpreted the law.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs December 2, 2008 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. TOBIAS TOBY HORTON and LATOYA LYNN TOWNSEND Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Obion County No. CC-08-CR22 William B. Acree, Jr., Judge No. W2008-01170-CCA-R3-CD - Filed August 13, 2009 The Defendant-A
State v. Harris, 08ap-723 (3-17-2009)public domain
OPINION {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Rosevelt Harris ("appellant"), appeals from the judgment of the Franklin County Municipal Court, which, following a jury trial, convicted him of telecommunications harassment in violation of R.C. 2917.21(B). {¶ 2} On appeal, appellant asserts only one assignment of error, as follows: THE TRIAL COURT ER
Chicago Property Interests, L.L.C. v. Broussardpublic domain
TOBIAS, J., concurs. I respectfully concur. I write separately to note that the denial of a writ application by an appellate court, regardless of any detailed reasons given for the denial, are of no precedential value. Lake Air Capital II, LLC v. Perera, 15-0038, p. 7 (La.App. 4 Cir. 5/13/15), 172 So.3d 84, 88; State v. Davis, 09-0438, p. 19 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1/13/10), 30 So.3d 201,
United States v. Zertuche-Tobiaspublic domain
953 F.Supp. 803 (1996) UNITED STATES of America, v. Graciano Eduardo ZERTUCHE-TOBIAS and Edgardo Rodriguez Carrera. Criminal No. H-96-181. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. December 3, 1996. *804 *805 *806