Cases

JACOBS, Justice. The plaintiffs, who are stockholders of J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. (“JPMC”), brought this purported class action for money damages in the Court of Chancery, challenging a merger in which JPMC acquired Bank One Corporation (“Bank One”) in July 2004. The plaintiffs claimed that the JPMC directors had breached their fiduciary duties by: (1) approving a merger exchange ratio that paid an unnecessary and excessive

OPINION RALPH B. GUY, JR., Circuit Judge. Grant, Konvalinka & Harrison, P.C., (GKH) appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s decisions dismissing the two complaints it filed in bankruptcy court, and denying it leave to file a third complaint in state court, each of which alleged malicious prosecution and abuse of proce

500 F.Supp.2d 437 (2007) EMERSON ELECTRIC CO., et al., Plaintiffs, v. LE CARBONE LORRAINE, S.A., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 05-6042 (JBS). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. August 9, 2007. *438 *439 *440 Daniel A. Sasse, Esq., Matthew J

642 F.Supp.2d 381 (2008) EMERSON ELECTRIC COMPANY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. LE CARBONE LORRAINE, S.A., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 05-6042 (JBS). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. October 7, 2008. *382 Daniel A. Sasse, Esq., Crowell & Moring, Irvine, CA, and Matthew J. McBurney, Esq., Crowell & Moring, L

BARNEY, Judge. Bobby H. Anglin (Mr. Anglin) appeals from the trial court’s judgment which set aside a collector’s deed to him of certain real property located in McDonald County, Missouri, and quieted title to the real property in Celsita Elsa Harrison, formerly, Celsita Elsa Racicot (Ms. Harrison).1 Ms. Harrison owned the property prior to the tax sale. She testified that she

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2022-CA-00887-COA NANNETTE LEIGHANNE SCOTT APPELLANT v. CHRIS LE APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/18/2022 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. MARGARET ALFONSO COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HARRISON COUNTY CHANCERY COURT,

Case: 20-10377 Document: 00515768605 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/05/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED

POOLER, Circuit Judge: Louis Birden appeals the October 28, 1999, judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Frederick J. Scullin, Jr., Chief Judge ) sentencing him principally to 57 months imprisonment after he pleaded guilty to distributing crack and aiding and abetting the distribution of crack. This case presents us with another example of our need to require strict adher

SALMON, Judge. On November 17, 1993, Stanley Alpert and his wife, Carol (the Alperts), filed suit against Le’Lisa Condominium and Edward M. Swiggard, John C. Tunell, and Alfred B. Inners, members of Le’Lisa’s Board of Directors (Le’Lisa), in the Circuit Court for Worcester County. The suit alleged, inter alia, that Le’Lisa Condominium’s board had no authority to assign individual parking spaces for the exclusive use o

Keaty, J., dissenting: I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion as I find that it applies a more rigid and onerous standard than that which the law requires. As Judge Conery correctly notes, "[t]he primary focus of the public records doctrine is the protection of third persons against unrecorded interests." Cimarex Energy Co. v. Mauboules , 09-1170, p. 20 (La. 4/9/10),

241 F.3d 289 (2nd Cir. 2001) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,v.ROBERT HARRISON, also known as Sealed Defendant #1, also known as Bobby, ROBERT LEWIS, also known as Sealed Defendant #2, also known as Charles, LESLIE EDWARDS, also known as Sealed Defendant #3, also known as Les, CARL DAWSON, also known as Sealed Defendant #5, REGINALD MILLER, ABRAHAM WHALEY and JESSE C. FULTON, Defendants,LOUIS BIRDEN, also known as Sealed Defendant #4

Keaty, J., dissenting: I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion as I find that it applies a more rigid and onerous standard than that which the law requires. As Judge Conery correctly notes, "[t]he primary focus of the public records doctrine is the protection of third persons against unrecorded interests." Cimarex Energy Co. v. Mauboules , 09-1170, p. 20 (La. 4/9/10),

By Judge Melvin R. Hughes, Jr. In these cases, one at law seeking a money judgment and the other in equity seeking declaratory relief, the defendant has filed demurrers. Both cases involve common facts concerning the rights and obligations of the parties, an attorney, Nathanson, who was formerly employed with plaintiff, and a law firm, under a written employment contract. The facts that give rise to the parties’ differences

ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF, United States District Judge Pro se plaintiff Kuai Le Chen brings this mandamus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1361, seeking an order directing defendants to adjudicate three immigration-related applications. (Compl. (Doc. No. 1).) Defendants, the Secretary of the United States Departm

w f' \ 3 |@ ‘ OS FIECE|VED IN ' COURT OF CH|PA|NAL APPEALS JUN 13 2016 ..._M;,. .*.‘....'. BAa:z.-. c_:za:. crr. cz».us.

STEPHEN J. WINDHORST, Judge. 12Pefendant, Khanh Le, along with co-defendant Katherine Le, was charged with the intentional discharge of a firearm during the commission of an aggravated assault and/or aggravated criminal damage to property, wherein it was foreseeable that it may result in death or great bodily harm, in violation of La. R.S. 14:95F. Both proceeded to trial by jury, after which defendant Khanh Le was found guilty

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO EN EL TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL FAUSTINO GARCÍA CERTIORARI RIVERA procedente del Tribunal de Peticionario Primera Instancia KLCE202401385 Sala Superior de v.

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO EN EL TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL FAUSTINO GARCÍA CERTIORARI RIVERA procedente del Tribunal de Peticionario Primera Instancia Sala Superior de v.

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL VII HARRISON RAMÍREZ Apelación JUSINO; ASOCIACIÓN DE procedente del PESCADORES UNIDOS Tribunal de Primera DE LA PARGUERA, INC. Instancia, Sala de Mayagüez Apelante

, ` -6;@_@52_665565 ‘ ~ RECE\vED \N ` . . .. . cum oF cnm\NAnPPEALS¢_ v _CZZZA~Z{'_WQ~W O'zp'BM-/Q c JU\ 1 n ')h‘\f; _5000565£_5¢¢0575_55@26/§ 056/7 _ _56265»55/5¢ 6!75 /5%556 wit /600<_0 72 5560/56656/ _//;6_ _/