Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FILED FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SEP 22 2010 Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy Courts for the District of ColumbIa Judy Harrison,

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Judy Harrison appeals the district court’s order dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

MEMORANDUM OPINION Royce C. Lamberth, United States District Judge I. Background Although this case is not breaking any records at merely thirteen years old, Cf. DiBacco v. U.S. Army, 795 F.3d 178 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (FOIA litigation' lasting more than thirty years), this matter will continue to live on past toda

MEMORANDUM OPINION Royce C. Lamberth, United States District Judge Before the Court are plaintiffs Hall and Studies Solutions Results’ motion [223] for interim attorneys’ fees and plaintiff Accuracy in Media’s motion [224] for interim attorneys’ fees for their work in this case. For over a decade, plaintiffs have sought records under the Freedo

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge. Plaintiffs Roger Hall (“Hall”), Studies Solutions Results, Inc., and Accuracy in Media (“AIM”) filed this action against defendant Central Intelligence Agency (“CIA” or “Agency”) under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552 et seq., seeking records concernin

668 F.Supp.2d 172 (2009) Roger HALL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, Defendant. Civil Action No. 04-00814 (HHK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 12, 2009. *175 John Harrison Clarke, Law Office John H. Clarke, James H. Lesar, Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs. David Cotter Rybic

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WYNSHIP W. HILLIER, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 16-cv-1836 (DLF) CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Pro se plaintiff Wynship Hillier invokes the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, to iden

620 F.Supp.2d 58 (2009) PETER B., Plaintiff, v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-1652 (RWR). United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 1, 2009. *64 Mark S. Zaid, Mark S. Zaid, PC, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Marcia Kay Sowles, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ______________________________ ) PETER B., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 06-1652 (RWR) ) CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, ) et al., ) ) Defendants.

425 F.Supp. 633 (1977) Maurice BAKER et al., Plaintiffs, v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 76-516. United States District Court, District of Columbia. January 4, 1977. *634 Marion Edwyn Harrison, Harrison, Lucey & Sagle, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff Maurice Baker. Paul F. Figley, Civ. D

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL. TATEL, Circuit Judge. The Central Intelligence Agency fired appellant Martha Hutchinson following three years of poor performance ratings. Convinced she didn’t get a fair shake, Hutchinson seeks relief on two grounds: under the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(l)(C), based on an alleged omission from her fi

Opinion for the court filed by TAMM, Circuit Judge. TAMM, Circuit Judge: This appeal arises from the granting of summary judgment for the appellee Central Intelligence Agency in a suit brought in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552 (1976). For the reasons stated below, we

SARAH EVANS BARKER, JUDGE Plaintiff Karl Trahan ("Trahan") was a shareholder of Interactive Intelligence ("Interactive"),1 an Indiana corporation, before it was acquired in a cash-out merger ("the Merger") by Genesys ("Genesys"),2 a California corporation. Trahan has now filed this putative class action,3 on

On the day of the shooting, Ms. Mayer deposited her child at her mother's house at 7:05 a.m. As Ms. Mayer was leaving, she saw what she thought was a couple arguing across the street from her mother's house. Seconds afterwards, Ms. Mayer heard Ms. Hedgepeth screaming and then saw Ms. Hedgepeth struggling with the suspect, who was standing next to Ms. Hedgepeth's car. Ms. Mayer ran toward the commotion. The suspect reached in and out of Ms. Hedgepeth's vehic

USCA4 Appeal: 19-4180 Doc: 154 Filed: 08/18/2022 Pg: 1 of 54 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-4123 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. MONTANA BARRONETTE, Defendant – Appellant.

USCA11 Case: 21-11982 Document: 41-1 Date Filed: 06/23/2023 Page: 1 of 35 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-11982 ____________________ RALPH HARRISON BENNING,

609 F.Supp.2d 561 (2009) William Henry HARRISON a/k/a God Kundalini Isa Allah, Plaintiff, v. Harrell WATTS, et al., Defendants. No. 1:06cv1061 (TSE/TCB). United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. March 26, 2009. *563 William Henry Harrison, Richmond, VA, pro se. Monika L. Moore, U.S. Attorney Office

EISMANN, Chief Justice. This is an appeal from: (a) an order denying a motion to amend the complaint to assert a claim of negligent eredentialing against a hospital; (b) an order refusing to order discovery of certain medical records provided by a physician to the board of medicine; and (c) the granting of summary judgment in favor of an emergency room physi

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge. This case arises out of the bombing of the U.S.S. Cole (“the Cole”) on October 12, 2000. The attack ripped a thirty-two-by-thirty-six-foot hole in the side of the vessel when it was berthed in Yemen’s Aden Harbor. Seventeen servicemen and women were killed, and forty-two suffered injuries. The eighteen plai

399 F.Supp.2d 1052 (2005) Anthony HOLGUIN, Petitioner, v. Michael HARRISON, in his capacity as Warden of the California State Prison, Los Angeles County, in Lancaster, Respondent. No. C 05-01118 CRB. United States District Court, N.D. California. September 16, 2005. *1053 David J. Sepanik, Michael F. Tubach, O'Melveny & Myers