⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Harrison C Pulsifer”

Missouri Court of Appeals · 1931-12-07 · Published · cited 17× · 47 S.W.2d 233; 226 Mo. App. 529; 1931 Mo. App. LEXIS 48
The respondents, plaintiffs below, instituted this action to recover for the wrongful death of their unmarried minor son, Lawrence Pulsifer, who died July 29, 1928, from the result of an electric shock received by coming in contact with a transmission wire on July 24, 1928. The suit was instituted against the city of Albany, a city of the fourth class, and the Darlington Electric Light Company. Before submitting the case to the jury, plaintiffs dismissed as to the Darlington Company. Upon evi
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2002-04-30 · Published · cited 4× · 2002 WI 40; 643 N.W.2d 452; 252 Wis. 2d 103; 2002 Wisc. LEXIS 237
252 Wis.2d 103 (2002) 2002 WI 40 643 N.W.2d 452 Karen C. MARTIN, and Allen H. Martin, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Petitioners, CITY OF FRANKLIN, Involuntary-Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Wisconsin insurance corporation, Defendant-Respondent, Eric H. JOHNSEN, Henry Johnsen d/b/a Johnsen Construction, and ABC Insurance Company, the fictitious name for an unknown insurance
Gott v. Pulsiferpublic domain
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877-03-07 · Published · cited 26× · 122 Mass. 235; 1877 Mass. LEXIS 105
Gray, C. J. This action is not for a libel upon the plaintiff, but for publishing a false and malicious statement concerning his property, and could not be supported without allegation and' proof of special damage. Malachy v. Soper, 3 Bing. N. C. 371; S. C. 3 Scott, 723. Swan v. Tapp an, 5 Cush. 104. The special damage alleged was the loss of the sale of the plaintiff’s statue to Palme
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2026-04-16 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-0510-25 THE STATE OF TEXAS v. GRADY JACK BARBER, Appellee ON APPELLEE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE NINTH COURT OF APPEALS LIBERTY COUNTY Schenck, P.J., filed a dissenting opinion in which RICHARDSON, J., joined and in which KEEL, J., joined
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002-08-09 · Published · cited 2× · 300 F.3d 1361; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 16450
300 F.3d 1361 Joseph C. CAMPA, Wayne S. Airmet, Mario P. Alfonsi, Randolph P. Allen, Steven R. Allison, James P. Anderson, Michael L. Anderson, John M. Archield, Johnny D. Ayo, Richard D. Ballas, Donald G. Baker, Robert L. Baltzer, Robert E. Barb, Michael K. Barber, Marya M. Bard, William D. Barker, Richard C. Beaman, Lee R. Beard, David W. Bearden, Lisa Mara Bell, Robert D. Bell, Scott W. Beyer, Michael G. Birdsong, Ricky A. Blakely, Betty Borders
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2002-04-26 · Published · cited 11× · 563 S.E.2d 825; 211 W. Va. 160; 2002 W. Va. LEXIS 39
563 S.E.2d 825 (2002) 211 W.Va. 160 AMERICAN STATES INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff Below, Appellee, v. Jack TANNER; June Tanner; Louise Rietz Nelson, Administratrix of the Estate of Alvin B. Nelson; State Farm Insurance Company; and Enterprise Rent-A-Car of Kentucky, Defendants Below, Rachel Neal Handel, Administratrix of the Estate of Oliver Neal, Jr., Defendant Below, Appellant. No. 29991.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2024-07-25 · Published · cited 14× · 109 F.4th 1297
USCA11 Case: 23-10600 Document: 48-1 Date Filed: 07/25/2024 Page: 1 of 42 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-10600 ____________________ DENNIE GOSE,
Oregon Supreme Court · 2026-05-14 · Published · cited 1× · 375 Or. 262
262 May 14, 2026 No. 25 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON Kristina SHEPPARD, Petitioner on Review, v. PROGRESSIVE CLASSIC INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Respondent on Review, and Eric McHENRY and State of Oregon, Defendants.
Montana Supreme Court · 1986-08-13 · Published · cited 10× · 723 P.2d 238; 222 Mont. 527; 13 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1230; 1986 Mont. LEXIS 1000
723 P.2d 238 (1986) Dale COX, Petitioner, v. LEE ENTERPRISES, INC., and the Billings Gazette, a division of Lee Enterprises, Inc., Respondents. No. 85-618. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted June 20, 1986. Decided August 13, 1986. *239 Huntley & Eakin, Gene Huntley (argued), Baker, for petitioner. Mou
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997-03-25 · Published · cited 14× · 957 F. Supp. 701; 25 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2153; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3415; 1997 WL 137181
957 F.Supp. 701 (1997) Howard FRIEDMAN, Plaintiff, v. ISRAEL LABOUR PARTY, Haim Ramon, David Libai, Moshe Shahal, Tova Elinson, Globe Newspaper Company, Jerusalem Post Publications, Ltd., and John Does I-XV, jointly and severally Defendants. Civil Action No. 96-CV-4702. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. March 25, 1997. *7
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2026-04-28 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS ______________________________________ ) HEIRS OF NOEL POPE, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) No. 24-1873 ) v. ) Filed: April 28, 2026 ) THE UNITED STATES, )
District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2024-08-16 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 DNH 067
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE NST Global, LLC, d/b/a SB Tactical v. Case No. 1:19-cv-00792-PB Opinion No. 2024 DNH 067 Sig Sauer Inc. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NST Global, LLC, filed this patent infringement action, alleging that Sig Sauer Inc. infringes two of its patents, U.S. Patent No. 8,869,444 (“
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2002-01-09 · Published · cited 20× · 188 F. Supp. 2d 684; 2002 WL 200956
188 F.Supp.2d 684 (2002) Mark NEWBY, Plaintiff, v. ENRON CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. Amalgamated Bank, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. Kenneth L. Lay, et al., Defendants. Nos. CIV.A. H-01-3624, CIV.A. H-01-4198. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. January 9, 2002.
Supreme Court of Missouri · 1972-12-11 · Published · cited 23× · 487 S.W.2d 449; 1972 Mo. LEXIS 814
487 S.W.2d 449 (1972) MISSION INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, Respondent, v. Mark S. WARD et al., Defendants, Mark S. Ward and Clifford Ward, Appellants. No. 57937. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. December 11, 1972. Paul E. Kovacs, Carter, Brinker & Doyen, Clayton, for respondent, Mission Ins. Co. Klutho & Cody, Edward C. Cody, St. Louis, fo
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2002-02-15 · Published · cited 56× · 206 F.R.D. 427; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3688
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER HARMON, District Judge. Pending before the Court in the above referenced action inter alia are objections to Judge Rosenthal’s December 12, 2001 order of consolidation filed (1) by Plaintiffs John and Peggy Odam et al. (“the Odam Plaintiffs”) (instrument #53, supplemented by # 99) and (2) by Plaintiff Henry H. Steiner (“Steiner”)(# 75). Als
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024-05-09 · Published · cited 34× · 101 F.4th 657
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-50048 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:20-cr-00387- v. AB-1 STEVEN DUARTE, AKA Shorty, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central
District Court, E.D. New York · 2013-05-03 · Published · cited 3× · 942 F. Supp. 2d 327; 2013 WL 1846543
SENTENCING MEMORANDUM, HEARING AND ORDER JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge: Table of Contents I. Introduction ............................................................329 II. Facts and Procedural History.............................................330 A. Offense.............................................................330
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998-09-17 · Published · cited 16× · 716 A.2d 1196; 315 N.J. Super. 137
716 A.2d 1196 (1998) 315 N.J. Super. 137 James SEDORE and Paul Reynolds, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. The RECORDER PUBLISHING CO., Bernardsville News, Charles Zavalick, and David Polakiewicz, Defendants-Appellants. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued April 22, 1998. Decided September 17, 1998.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984-07-16 · Published · cited 228× · 467 N.E.2d 126; 392 Mass. 508
392 Mass. 508 (1984) 467 N.E.2d 126 ROBERT BRATT & another[1] vs. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION & others[2]. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk. February 6, 1984. July 16, 1984. Present: WILKINS, LIACOS, ABRAMS, NOLAN, & LYNCH, JJ. David C. Casey for the plaintiffs.</
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024-10-23 · Published · cited 0× · 138 F.4th 1102
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT AL OTRO LADO, a California Nos. 22-55988 corporation; ABIGAIL DOE; 22-56036 BEATRICE DOE; CAROLINA DOE; DINORA DOE; INGRID DOE; D.C. No. URSULA DOE; VICTORIA DOE; 3:17-cv-02366- BIANCA DOE; JUAN DOE; BAS-KSC ROBERTO DOE; CESAR DOE; MARIA DOE; EMILIANA DOE, individually and on behalf of