Cases

236 F.Supp.2d 79 (2002) Paul G. BAMBERG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SG COWEN Defendant. Janet Baker, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SG Cowen Defendant. Janet Baker, et al., Plaintiffs, v. KPMG Singapore Defendant. No. CIV.A.02-CV-10304-PB No. CIV.A.02-CV-10367-PB. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. December 9, 2002.

Judgment affirmed, without costs, upon condition stated in order; otherwise, reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.. No opinion. Present — Finch, P. J., McAvoy, Martin, O’Malley and Townley, JJ.

Opinion issued October 13, 2015 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00951-CV ——————————— SHANNON L. COWEN, Appellant V. SAMUEL COW

Court of Appeals First District of Texas BILL OF COSTS No. 01-14-00951-CV Shannon L. Cowen v. Samuel Cowen NO. 2013-43776 IN THE 309TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY TYPE OF FEE

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER Appellate case name: Shannon L. Cowen v. Samuel Cowen Appellate case number: 01-14-00951-CV Trial court case number: 2013-43776 Trial court: 309th District Court of Harris County This case involves an appeal from a final judgment signed on October 23, 2014. Appellant, Shannon L. Cowen, filed

1717 McKinney Ave., Suite 1500, Dallas, Texas 75202 (214) 871-2727 5700 West Piano Parkway, Suite 2200, Piano, Texas 75093 (972) 769-2727 KoonsFuller 181 Grand Avenue, Suite 225, Southlake, Texas 76092 (817) 481-2710 320 W. Eagle Drive, Suite 200, Denton, Texas 76201 (940) 442-6677 Family Law 109North Post OakLane, Suite425, H

618 F.3d 398 (2010) Cheryl HARRIS, Co-administratrix of the Estate of Ryan D. Maseth, deceased; Douglas Maseth, Co-Administrator of the Estate of Ryan D. Maseth, deceased, v. KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT SERVICES, INC., Appellant. No. 09-2325. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued June 22, 2010. Filed August 17, 2010.

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge: On January 28, 2003, the Board of Supervisors of Los Angeles County1 voted to reduce expenditures by closing Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center (Rancho) and by reducing the number of hospital beds at Los Angeles County-USC Medical Center (LAC-USC). Ran-cho is a county hospital dedicated primarily to providing inpatient and outpatient

289 F.Supp.2d 996 (2003) Dora TEMORES, Plaintiff, v. SG COWEN, Societe Generale, Joseph Marinaro, and Dan Curley, Defendants. No. 02 C 7089. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. October 29, 2003. *997 *998 Keith L. Hunt, Keith L. Hunt & Associates, P.C., Lara A. A

OPINION OF THE COURT COWEN, Circuit Judge. In this appeal Vincent Harris contends that when the government paid several confidential informants to gather information and later had those informants testify at Harris’s criminal trial, the government violated the so-called “antigratuity statute,” 18 U.S.C. § 201(c)(2). The statute prohibits “whoever” from g

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 2 Fazio, et al. v. Nos. 02-3820/3821/3822/3823/ ELECTRONIC CITATION: 2003 FED App. 0284P (6th Cir.) Lehman Bros., 3824/3825/3826/3867/3868/3869/ File Name: 03a0284p.06 et al. 3870/3873/3874; 03-3041/3042/ 3043/3045/3112/3113/

206 F.Supp.2d 702 (2002) INTERVEST FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff, v. S.G. COWEN SECURITIES CORP., Defendant. Nos. 98-CV-3278, 99-CV-5463. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. June 19, 2002. *703 *704 Michael K. Coran, Ira A. Rosenau, Klehr, Harrison Harvey Branzburg & Ell

DISSENT: MITCHELL and STIGER, JJ. *Page 1118 On October 10, 1941, the grand jury of Polk county returned an indictment against the defendant, Louis J. (Louie) Cowen, for illegal possession of gambling devices, which indictment recited that the defendant was accused of "Illegal Possession of Gambling Devices as defined in Section 13210 of the 1939 Code of Iowa, and charge that Louis Cowen had kept or held in his possession or under his control certain punc

394 F.3d 444 Samuel GLAZER, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.LEHMAN BROTHERS, INC., Defendant,SG Cowen Securities Corporation; Societe Generale, Defendants-Appellants.Samuel Glazer, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Lehman Brothers, Inc.; Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc., Defendants-Appellants,SG Cowen Securities Corporation, Defendant. No. 03-4312. No. 03-4415. United St

This personnel case comes to the court on cross-motions for summary judgment involving the challenge of Herbert H. Harris to an adverse ruling by the Federal Employee Appeals Authority (FEAA). The issues have been fully briefed and oral argument has been had. Mr. Harris, a preference eligible veteran, was employed by the Postal Service from 1962 to 1977, when he was removed from the service. He was initially hired as a writer, and he la

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WADDY, District Judge. This civil action, filed April 1, 1977, alleged failure on the part of the Secretary of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to properly perform its statutory duty and non-compliance with regulations relating to site requirements for a housing development for senior citizens known as Fort Lincoln Senior Village (Senior Village).

434 F.Supp. 320 (1977) Alice STANBACK et al., Plaintiffs, v. Patricia HARRIS et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 77-0583. United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 9, 1977. *321 Robinwyn Dietrich Lewis, Arlington, David V. Marshall, Institute of Law & Aging, George Washington University, Washington, D. C., for plai

745 F.Supp. 925 (1990) COWEN & COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Dori MERRIAM, Jerome E. Rosen, Joseph D. Radcliffe and James A. Merriam, Defendants. COWEN & COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. CIRCLE LAND & CATTLE CO., a Colorado Corporation, Jerome E. Rosen, Joseph D. Radcliffe and James A. Merriam, Defendants. Nos. 88 Civ. 4406(RPP), 88 Civ. 4439(RPP). United States District Court, S.D. New York.

39 Ill. App.3d 1043 (1976) 351 N.E.2d 257 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WILBERT HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 61652. Illinois Appellate Court — First District (1st Division). Opinion filed June 14, 1976. *1044 *1045 James J. Doherty, Pub

MARKEY, Chief Judge. Maxine Starr Harris (Mrs. Harris) appeals a decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (Board), 39 M.S.P.R. 293 (1988), denying the election of a survivor annuity by Arthur Harris (Mr. Harris). * We affirm-in-part, reverse-in-part and remand. BACKGROUND