Cases

MEMORANDUM ** Judith Harris appeals the district court’s order affirming the denial by the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) of her application for Social Security Disability Insurance Benefits. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s decision upholding the Commissioner’s denial of benefits and must uphold the

MEMORANDUM * Claimant-Appellant Jeanette Harris appeals the district court’s order upholding the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. Because the parties are familiar with the facts, we recite them only as necessary. We remand to the Commissioner for further proceedings before the ALJ. A district court’s ord

259 F.Supp.2d 775 (2003) Eudell L. HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. No. 00-C-0464. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. April 25, 2003. *777 David Traver, Traver Law Office, Milwaukeee, WI, for Plaintiff. Penelope Fleming, U.S. Dept. of Justi

231 F.Supp.2d 776 (2002) Arlillian HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. No. 02 C 2243. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. November 14, 2002. *777 *778 Robert C. Kielian, M. Jacqueline Walther, Kiel

219 F.Supp.2d 966 (2002) Eudell L. HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART,[1] Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. No. 00-C-0464. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. August 23, 2002. *967 *968 David F. Traver, Milwaukee, WI, for Plaintiff.

MEMORANDUM** We affirm the judgment of the district court. I. The ALJ’s Development of The Record Whether the ALJ had a duty to request medical source statements is irrelevant to the relief Harris seeks: a remand for an award of benefits or, alternatively, a remand with instructions to the ALJ to consider the report by Dr. Berselli that Harris submitted to the A

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 03-1512 ___________ Stefania Harris, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western

*928 COLLOTON, Circuit Judge. Stefania Harris applied for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. The Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denied Harris’s application. An administrative law judge (“ALJ”) determined

Opinion by JUDGE J. JONES {1 Plaintiff, Matthew V. Barnhart (son), appeals the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendant, American Furniture Warehouse Company (AFW), on his wrongful death claim. T2 We must decide whether, under Colorado's Wrongful Death Act (the Act), sections 13-21-201 to -204, C.R.S.20183, an heir may bring a wrongful death claim after a decedent's survi

436 F.Supp.2d 1239 (2006) Sherry COLE, o/b/o E.S.C., Plaintiff v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Civil Action No. 05-G-1303-NW. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Northwestern Division. June 28, 2006. *1240 Robert J. Harris, Harris & South PC, Florence, AL, for Plaintiff. Lane

320 F.Supp.2d 1227 (2004) Sharon Latricia KING, Plaintiff, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Civ.A. No. 02-G-2555-W. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Western Division. June 1, 2004. *1228 George W. Harris, George W. Harris PC, Tuscaloosa, AL, for plaintiff. Alice H. Martin, U.S.

MEMORANDUM ** Plaintiff-Appellant Harry R. Copeland appeals an order of the district court dismissing his civil action against DefendantAppellee Acting Commissioner of Social Security William A. Halter for denial of his Social Security disability benefits. Copeland had previously applied for benefits in 1990, and his claim was denied following a hearing before an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) on August 17

225 F.Supp.2d 704 (2002) Harry L. MARTIN, Plaintiff v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant No. 4:99CV00054. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Danville Division. October 9, 2002. *705 Jerry L. Williams, Jr., Williams, Luck and Williams, Danville, VA, Robert Allen Williams, Williams, Luck &

375 F.Supp.2d 1335 (2003) Elaine Janice KEENAN f/k/a Elaine Janice Monholland, Plaintiff, v. Jo Anne BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant. No. CIV-01-835-T. United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma. February 28, 2003. *1336 James D. Harris, Gonshor & Harris, Oklahoma City, OK, for Plaintiff.<

ORDER HENRY, Circuit Judge. Upon considering Barbara White’s petition for rehearing, the opinion has been *905altered. Part V, the section addressing the administrative law judge’s refusal to recontact the treating physician, now makes clear that this obligation arises whenever the information received from the treating doctor is inadequate, not wh

184 F.Supp.2d 777 (2002) Joseph BRAZZALE, Plaintiff, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. No. 00 C 8109. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. January 16, 2002. *778 Stuart Harris Galesburg, Attorney at Law, Chicago, IL, for plaintiff. James Michael

884 N.E.2d 399 (2008) Arthur B. HARRIS, Appellant-Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 32A01-0705-CR-219. Court of Appeals of Indiana. April 16, 2008. *400 Cynthia P. Helfrich, Casey Law Offices, Brownsburg, IN, Attorney for Appellant. Steve Carter, Attorney General of Indiana, Scott L. Barnhart, Deputy

Searls, C. Plaintiffs, who are husband and wife, brought this action to recover three thousand six hundred dollars. According to the allegations of the com-, plaint, the plaintiffs, on the fifteenth day of December, 1884, were indebted to defendant in the sum of about $4,374, a balance due upon a promissory note of $8,000 made by them t'o the latter; that on said date, and as security for the payment.of such balance, they execute

This is an appeal from a conviction for sexual assault of a child in which the jury assessed punishment at 12 years confinement.1 Viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, the evidence reflects that complainant was a 14-year-old mentally retarded girl who lived with her mother. Complainant's mother became friends with appellant and his wife while all were living at the Harrisburg Hotel in Harris County, where appel

Opinion issued April 2, 2019 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00111-CV ——————————— ASHLEY SMITH, Appellant V. STEVEN BARNHART, Appellee