Cases

932 F.Supp. 1462 (1996) Jorge CARABALLO and Digna Caraballo, his wife, Plaintiffs, v. SOUTH STEVEDORING, INC., a Florida Corporation, Harrington & Company, Inc., a Florida Corporation, and Sea-Land Service, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Defendants. No. 96-0306-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. July 3, 1996. *1463

DANIEL L. DYSART, Judge. | plaintiffs, Jeffrey J. Harrington and Patricia Harrington, individually, and on behalf of her minor child, Paul Robert Hanys, appeal the grant of a summary judgment in favor of Boh Bros. Construction Co., L.L.C. (“Boh Bros.”), the City of New Orleans, and United Rentals, Inc. (“United Rentals”).1 For the following reasons, we affirm. FACTS AND PROCEDURA

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-19-00395-CV 2027 SOUTH AUSTIN STREET, LLC AND PAUL B. CHRISTY, APPELLANTS V. LATOUR CONDOMINIUMS, INC., APPELLEE On Appeal from the 108th District Court

LINDSAY, Judge. The defendant, John Lewis Henderson, appeals the trial court judgment denying his motion to enjoin garnishment of his wages. The plaintiff, John D. Moore, and the garnishee, South Central Bell Telephone Company, Inc., have answered the appeal. The record reveals that the defendant, John Lewis Henderson, was an employee of South Central Bell Telephone Company, Inc. On November 23, 1982,

On November 17, 2006, the Jefferson County grand jury indicted Janet King for two instances of violating "The Woman's Right to Know Act." Specifically, the indictments allege that King, "not being a physician as defined in Section 26-23A-3(7) of the Code of Alabama, did intentionally, knowingly or recklessly perform an abortion on a woman . . . in violation of Section 26-23A-7 of the Code of Alab

COLEMAN, Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. The Securities and Charities Division of the Mississippi Secretary of State Office (the “Division”) brought charges against Marshall Wolfe and Jack Harrington for securities violations pertaining to their operation of SteadiVest, LLC. The Secretary of State found that Wolfe and Harrington had violated Mississippi securities laws, and fines were levied against them. Wolfe a

Vacated and remanded by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote the opinion, in which Judge WIDENER joined. Judge KING wrote a dissenting opinion. *273OPINION NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge: BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., the incumbent local telephone company in North Carolina, filed these three actions, seeking to review decisions o

459 S.E.2d 309 (1995) Jean H. HARRINGTON and Fred L. Love, Respondents, v. Devoe BLACKSTON and Homeowners' Association of Leeward Landing, Inc., Defendants, of whom Devoe Blackston is, Appellant, and Homeowners' Association of Leeward Landing, Inc., is, Respondent. No. 2337. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard February 9, 1995. Filed April 17, 1995.</

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Zurich American Insurance Company of Illinois, Respondent, v. Palmetto Contract Services, Inc., Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2018-000692 Appeal from Charleston County Kristi Lea Harrington, Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 5833 Heard November 3,

80 Md. App. 464 (1989) 564 A.2d 119 SOUTH DOWN LIQUORS, INC. v. ROY D. HAYES, JR. No. 178, September Term, 1989. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. October 5, 1989. Certiorari Granted January 12, 1990. T. Michael Preston (Anderson, Coe & King, on brief), Baltimore, for appellant. H. Robert Scherr (Scherr, Cole &

RANDOLPH, Presiding Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. Two vehicles struck multi-ton counterweights owned by Mitchell Crane Services, Inc., which were on the traveled portion of Interstate 59 in Pearl River County. The accident occurred on July 25, 1999, at night. The occupants of the two vehicles sued Mitchell Crane. During the liability phase of a bifurcated trial, the jury found that a thief was seventy-five percen

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge KING wrote the opinion, in which Judge Widener joined. Judge TRAXLER wrote an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. OPINION KING, Circuit Judge. These consolidated appeals arise out of a failed business relationship between several real estate developers in North Carolina and Tennessee in the mid-1990s. In early 1993, David Riese and Ga

PER CURIAM: * The plaintiff-appellant, The College Network (TCN), sued the defendant-appellee, Moore Educational Publishers, Inc. (MEP), under § 43 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125. The intervenor plaintiff-appellee, Debra K. Moore, intervened in the suit and, along with MEP, brought claims against TCN for defamation and tortious interference with prospective business relations. The case was s

PER CURIAM: * The plaintiff-appellant, The College Network (TCN), sued the defendant-appellee, Moore Educational Publishers, Inc. (MEP), under § 43 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125. The intervenor plaintiff-appellee, Debra K. Moore, intervened in the suit and, along with MEP, brought claims against TCN for defamation and tortious interference with prospective business relations. The case was s

748 F.Supp. 919 (1990) Paul D. HARRINGTON, Luba Val Harrington, Sally A. Cumming, Brendan Jacob, Innocent Emmanuel, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civ. No. 85-2347CCC. United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. October 19, 1990. *920 *921 *

¶1 Resolution of this matter, which comes before us on discretionary review, requires us to ascertain the legislature’s intent in enacting and amending certain *128provisions of the Washington Consumer Protection Act (CPA).1 Two questions have been certified for review. First, when, pursuant to the CPA, the Attorney General of Washington brings an action as parens patr

Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge MOTZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILKINS and Judge KING joined. OPINION DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge: This appeal involves the proper resolution of certain timeliness questions in the arbitration context. The district court correctly found that it had jurisdiction to decide the timeliness of an action to compel arbitration unde

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-22-00422-CV Appellant, Uptown Cars, Inc. // Cross-Appellants, Newcastle Management Trust and Jerry Landers v. Appellees, Newcastle Management Trust and Jerry Landers // Cross-Appellee, Uptown Cars, Inc. FROM THE 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF T

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2021-CA-00735-SCT THEODORE LONGO, AMY LONGO, JOSEPH LEE, SUSAN LEE, GERALD SONNIER, AMY DAVIS, AND 920 SOUTH BEACH BLVD., LLC v. CITY OF WAVELAND, MISSISSIPPI AND BEACH WALK DEVELOPMENT, LLC DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/16/2021 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. RANDI PERESICH MUELLER COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HANCOCK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTS: VIRGIL G. GILLESPIE ATTORNEYS FOR

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ALLEN SHARP, District Judge. This cause is before the Court on Defendant Jewel Food Stores, Inc.’s Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiffs’ Second Claim for Relief. The Court has considered all relevant materials submitted by the parties and now rules as follows. JURISDICTION This cause of action arises