Cases

MILLER, District Judge. Kenneth Carter committed armed robbery and aggravated battery inside a church shortly before a scheduled mass. His sentence for those offenses reflects consideration of what is now 730 ILCS 5/5-5-3.2(a)(ll), which deems as an aggravating factor the occurrence of a state crime in or on the grounds of a place of worship immediately before, during, or immedi

THIRD DIVISION DILLARD, P. J., GOBEIL and HODGES, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules Sep

AP-77,045 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 12/3/2015 7:16:03 AM Accepted 12/3/2015 7:54:11 AM December 3, 2015

367 S.C. 329 (2006) 626 S.E.2d 328 The STATE, Petitioner, v. Robert Earl MILLER, Respondent. No. 26106. Supreme Court of South Carolina. Heard November 16, 2005. Decided February 6, 2006. *330 Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Senior As

359 S.C. 589 (2004) 598 S.E.2d 297 The STATE, Respondent, v. Robert Earl MILLER, Appellant. No. 3784. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard March 10, 2004. Decided April 26, 2004. Withdrawn, Substituted, and Refiled June 28, 2004. Rehearing Denied June 28, 2004.

10/10/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 4, 2019 Session KENNETH A. WEBER ET AL. V. HAROLD W. KROEGER ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 16-1151-II Anne C. Martin, Chancellor No. M

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE AMGINE TECHNOLOGIES (US), INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2020-0537-JRS ) HAROLD ROY MILLER, JONATHAN ) DAVID MEYER MILLER, SEVEN ) MEDICAL INC., AMGINE ) TECHNOLOGIES

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-19-00282-CV ___________________________ HAROLD MILLER, Appellant V. CONFORMIS, INC. AND JOSEPH BERMAN, Appellees On Appeal from the 348th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 348-298642-18 Before Sudderth, C.J.; B

OPINION ENSLEN, Chief Judge. This matter is before the Court on plaintiff Haworth Inc.’s appeal from Magistrate Judge Rowland’s May 3,1995 Order granting defendant’s motion to compel. Plaintiff argues that the magistrate erroneously ordered the disclosure of privileged attorney work product. Defendant Herman Miller, Inc. argues that the information is discoverable as information provided plainti

856 F.Supp. 354 (1994) HAWORTH, INC., Plaintiff, v. HERMAN MILLER, INC.; Carithers-Wallace-Courtenay, dba CWC Office Outfitters; and Arthur Anderson & Co.; Defendants, and The Knoll Group, Inc.; Mauri Sardi; James Williams; Harold Snodgrass; Ford F. Farabow, Jr.; Reff Corporation; and Westinghouse Electric Corporation; Movants. No. 1:92:CV:877. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan.</

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-24-00282-CV New Braunfels Stewardship Properties, LLC and Harold T. Ray, III, Appellants v. Circle F Investments, LP and Original DFI, LLC, Appellees FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, NO. C2021-0208D, THE HONORABLE DIB WALDRIP, JUDGE PRESIDING ORDER AND MEMO

OPINION ENSLEN, Chief Judge. The matter before the Court is defendant’s motion for reconsideration of a laches summary judgment Order this Court entered on February 9, 1994. The products plaintiff alleges infringe its patents are electrically powered office panel systems. In its original Opinion, the Court ruled that plaintiff Haworth, Inc. (“Haworth”) delayed more than six

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0091p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ PATRICK D. REED, │ Petitioner-Appellant,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE 07/20/2023 AT NASHVILLE April 6, 2022 Session DENNIS HAROLD ULTSCH v. HTI MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 19C1086

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1932 Doc: 46 Filed: 07/25/2023 Pg: 1 of 20 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-1932 JACOBY L. GARRETT, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, individually and in his official capacity as Director of

786 So.2d 1106 (2000) Creighton E. MILLER, as administrator of the estate of Jabe J. Fincher, Sr., deceased v. AMERADA HESS CORPORATION et al. 1990431. Supreme Court of Alabama. December 1, 2000. Donald A. Krispin of Jaques Admiralty Law Firm, P.C., Detroit, Michigan; and Larry Charles Moorer, Mobile, for appellant. George M. Walker of Hand Arendall, L.L.C.,

EAKIN, Judge. In 1956, Harry Miller Jr. began operating a septic business on a farm he and his wife owned in Thombury Township. In 1975, he sold the business to his son, Harry Miller III, who also operated a portable toilet business and Christmas tree farm from the site. The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources (“DER”)1 issued him a permit which allowed him to fertilize the trees with

USCA4 Appeal: 21-6507 Doc: 54 Filed: 11/07/2022 Pg: 1 of 20 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-6507 DAVID A. RICHARDSON, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Virginia Department of Corrections; EDDIE L. PEARSON, Lead Ward

885 F.Supp. 1561 (1995) James Andrew COLEMAN v. Zell MILLER, Governor of the State of Georgia and The State of Georgia. Civ. No. 1:94-CV-1673-ODE. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. March 31, 1995. *1562 *1563 Randal Alonzo Mangham, Office of Randal Alonzo Mangham, B

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0121p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plai