Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Harold Thomas Wilson”
United States v. Harold Thomas Wilson, United States of America v. Bobby Eugene Hendrixpublic domain
JERRE S. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge: Harold Thomas Wilson and Bobby Eugene Hendrix, appellants, were indicted in a twenty-one defendant, thirty-five count indictment aimed at breaking an alleged her *758 oin distribution ring in South Dallas, Texas. Wilson was charged with conspiracy to distribute hero
The Estate of Harold Silvester Dorsey, Sr., Harold S. Dorsey, Jr., Administrator v. Derek J. Matorypublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2024-CA-00925-COA THE ESTATE OF HAROLD SILVESTER APPELLANT DORSEY, SR., DECEASED, HAROLD S. DORSEY, JR., ADMINISTRATOR v. DEREK J. MATORY APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/15/2024 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. J. DEWAYNE THOMAS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED
Harold Thomas Centers, Jr. v. State of Tennesseepublic domain
08/12/2024 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 23, 2024 HAROLD THOMAS CENTERS, JR. v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Cumberland County No. 22-293 Wesley Thomas Bray, Judge ___________________________________
Wilson v. Astruepublic domain
ENTRY REVIEWING THE COMMISSIONER’S DECISION JANE MAGNUS-STINSON, United States Magistrate Judge. Defendant Michael J. Astrue, the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (the “Commissioned’), denied Plaintiff Justin Wilson’s application for supplemental security income (“SSI”). He has filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), asking the Court to review that denial.
Wilson v. Parisipublic domain
(2008) Almus WILSON, Marilyn Wilson, Charmaine Cooper, Marco Yagual, Maria Yagual, Natalie Wilson, and Rayon McLean, Plaintiffs v. Steve PARISI, et al., Defendants. No. 3:CV-04-1737. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. February 26, 2008. MEMORANDUM THOMAS I. VANASKIE, District Judge. This is one of several actions brought
WILSON, HAROLD v. COLOSIMO, CHRISTOPHERpublic domain
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 1415 CA 12-01156 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, FAHEY, CARNI, AND VALENTINO, JJ. HAROLD WILSON AND GEORGIA WILSON, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CHRISTOPHER COLOSIMO AND R.J. CHEVROLET, INC., DOING BUSINESS AS BOB JOHNSON CHEVROLET, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. HOGAN WILLIG, AMHERST (ERIC B. GROSSMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF
State v. Wilsonpublic domain
26 P.3d 1161 (2001) 200 Ariz. 390 The STATE of Arizona, Appellant, v. Thomas Harold WILSON, Appellee. No. 2 CA-CR 00-0054. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division Two, Department A. May 31, 2001. As Corrected June 18, 2001. *1163 Barbara LaWall, Pima County Attorney, By Elizabeth Tyszko, Tuc
ESCHBACH, Senior Circuit Judge. In this appeal, we consider whether the district court improperly granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants in this *349 pretrial detainee’s civil rights claim. Our jurisdiction is provided by 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We reverse and remand.
State v. Wilsonpublic domain
546 N.W.2d 323 (1996) 4 Neb. App. 489 STATE of Nebraska, Appellee, v. Harold L. WILSON, Appellant. No. A-95-288. Court of Appeals of Nebraska. April 2, 1996. *326 Thomas L. Spinar, Saline County Public Defender, for appellant. Don Stenberg, Attorney General, and David K. Arterburn, Lincoln, for appe
Patrick Reed v. Harold Maypublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0091p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ PATRICK D. REED, │ Petitioner-Appellant,
Wilson v. Statepublic domain
[1] OPINION [2] John Harold Wilson, the appellant, was tried by jury and convicted of Unlawful Possession of Marijuana in violation of 63 O.S. 1981 § 2-402[63-2-402], in Case No. CRM-83-182, in Jackson County District Court before the Honorable Paul Braun. The jury set punishment at nine (9) months imprisonment, and the trial court sentenced the appellant in accordance with the jury's verdict. Appellant has perfected
Harold Lawrence Walton v. the State of Texaspublic domain
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 14, 2024. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-23-00265-CR HAROLD LAWRENCE WALTON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 174th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court
Robinholt v. Wilsonpublic domain
[Cite as Robinholt v. Wilson, 2023-Ohio-248.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) LYNDA ROBINHOLT C.A. No. 21CA011782 Appellant v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE ROBERT WILSON, e
Adam Toghill v. Harold Clarkepublic domain
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge Traxler wrote the opinion in which Judge Wilkinson and Judge Agee joined. TRAXLER, Circuit Judge: Petitioner Adam Darrick Toghill, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s denial of his habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d), in which he challenges his state court convicti
Harold Fish v. Tim Brownpublic domain
SMITH, District Judge: Two Holmes County, Florida, Deputy Sheriffs entered the home of appellant while accompanying his former lover to the residence for the purpose of retrieving personal belongings left there. The Deputies observed guns in the home and arrested appellant for violating an injunction prohibiting his possession of firearms. He filed suit in the state court syst
James Harold Higgason, III v. State of Indianapublic domain
FILED May 19 2023, 10:14 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals
853 S.W.2d 752 (1993) HAROLD-ELLIOTT COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. K.P./MILLER REALTY GROWTH FUND I, Appellee. No. 01-92-00998-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). April 22, 1993. Rehearing Overruled May 13, 1993. *753 Thomas C. Wright, James L. Hordern, Jr., Brown Campbell Harrison & Wright, L.
In re Estate of Wilsonpublic domain
[Cite as In re Estate of Wilson, 2021-Ohio-1056.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) IN RE: ESTATE OF HAROLD E. C.A. No. 29738 WILSON, DANIEL WILSON Appellant APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT v.
Harold A. Spriggs v. Jerry v. Wilsonpublic domain
PER CURIAM: The motion for stay is denied. In so doing, we deem it appropriate to state, as we suggested in United States v. Allen, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 84, 408 F.2d 1287 (1969), that on this record we see no reason, and the Government at oral argument has offered none beyond an unsubstantiated reference to convenience, why the right to
Ford v. Thomaspublic domain
The plaintiff, Walter Thomas, brought suit against the defendants, Dee Ford, James Jurkoski, and Alan Downey, for assault and battery and malicious prosecution. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff Thomas. *Page 1218 Defendants appeal, complaining of certain evidentiary rulings of the trial court. We affirm. We do not deem it necessary or prudent to set out in detail the facts. Viewing the record with the attendant presu