Cases

People v Medina (2023 NY Slip Op 01868) People v Medina 2023 NY Slip Op 01868 Decided on April 11, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. <

People v Medina (2023 NY Slip Op 01868) People v Medina 2023 NY Slip Op 01868 Decided on April 11, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. <

386 B.R. 678 (2008) In re RAYMOND PROFESSIONAL GROUP, INC., et al., Debtor. Raymond Professional Group, Inc. Plaintiff, v. William A. Pope Company Defendant. National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford Intervening Plaintiff, v. Raymond Professional Group, Inc., Raymond Professional Group — Design/Build, Inc. and William A. Pope Company Intervening Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 06-B-16748. Adversary No. 07-A-0063

414 B.R. 433 (2009) In re RAYMOND PROFESSIONAL GROUP, INC., et al., Debtors. Raymond Professional Group, Inc., et. al., Plaintiff, Raymond Management Services, Inc. n/k/a Raymond Professional Group-Design/Build, Inc., Co-Plaintiff to Count VI v. William A. Pope Company, Defendant. William A. Pope Company, Counter-Plaintiff as to Count VI v. Raymond Professional Group, Inc. and Raymond Management Services, Inc. n/k/a Raymond Pr

400 B.R. 624 (2009) In re RAYMOND PROFESSIONAL GROUP, INC., et al., Debtor. Raymond Professional Group, Inc., et. al., Plaintiff, Raymond Management Services, Inc. n/k/a Raymond Professional Group-Design/Build, Inc., Co-Plaintiff to Count VI v. William A. Pope Company, Defendant. William A. Pope Company, Counter-Plaintiff to Count VI v. Raymond Professional Group, Inc. and Raymond Management Services, Inc. n/k/a Raymond Profes

421 B.R. 891 (2009) In re RAYMOND PROFESSIONAL GROUP, INC., et al., Debtors. Raymond Professional Group, Inc., Plaintiff, Raymond Management Services, Inc. n/k/a Raymond Professional Group-Design/Build, Inc., Co-Plaintiff to Count VI v. William A. Pope Company, Defendant. William A. Pope Company, Counter-Plaintiff as to Count VI v. Raymond Professional Group, Inc. and Raymond Management Services, Inc., n/k/a Raymond Profession

IN RE: RAYMOND PROFESSIONAL GROUP, INC., et al., Debtor. RAYMOND PROFESSIONAL GROUP, INC., et. al. Plaintiff, RAYMOND MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. n/k/a RAYMOND PROFESSIONAL GROUP — DESIGN/BUILD, INC., Co-Plaintiff to Count VI, v. WILLIAM A. POPE COMPANY Defendant. WILLIAM A. POPE COMPANY, Counter-Plaintiff to Count VI, v. RAYMOND PROFESSIONAL GROUP, INC. and RAYMOND MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. n/k/a RAYMOND PROFESSIONAL GROUP-DESIGN/BUILD, INC., Counter-

322 F.Supp.2d 230 (2004) UNITED STATES of America, v. Peter GOTTI, Anthony Ciccone, also known as "Sonny," Richard V. Gotti, Primo Cassarino, Jerome Brancato, also known as "Jerry," Richard G. Gotti, Peter Piacenti, also known as "Pete 17," Richard Bondi, Frank Scollo, also known as "Red" and "the *231 little guy," Vincent Nasso, also known as "Dr. Nasso," Julius Nasso, also known as "Jules," Anthony Pansini,

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS September 24, 2018 Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR THE

In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00846-CV ——————————— DAVID GORDON SCHMIDT D/B/A ABC BONDING COMPANY AND GREENBRIAR EQUITIES, LLC, Appellants V. BRENDA CRAWFORD, CARLOS PEREZ, ANTHONY WILLIAMS, ANNIE J. BUTLER, ANTHO

Arnold G. Fraiman, J. This is a motion by plaintiff Thomas J. Lipton, Inc. (Lipton) for a preliminary injunction enjoining defendant Borden Inc. (Borden) from simulating the elements of plaintiff’s package in any combination that may confuse the public, on the ground that defendant is committing acts of unfair competition against plaintiff. The product involved is an instant soup packaged for single servings. P

MEDINA, Circuit Judge (concurring in result): I concur fully with Judge Mansfield’s reasoned analysis by which he finds that the defendants have waived any objections to the Government’s intervention and that Judge Conner’s action on the Government’s informal request amounted to a de facto grant of permissive intervention under Rule 24(b). However, I do not agree with the “balanc

Miller, J. Although it seems clear from the papers submitted on this motion that the defendant was no longer bodily present in this State at the time of the attempt to make substituted service, there is an insufficient showing that defendant had, at the time, effected a change of his domicile from this State to some other jurisdiction. The papers establish to the court’s satisfaction that up to the time defendant is claimed to ha

This list is being published pursuant to Gov.Bar R. 1(15). The following persons have applied to take the February 2017 Ohio Bar Examination. Allen Taylor Gene Vance Lima Ashland Sarah Kathleen Lewis Austinburg Belmont Carson Lee Schambach St. Clairsville Butler Eric ScottBeutel Liberty Township Marc Edward Bras

DYER, Circuit Judge: Time, Inc., the defendant in this libel suit, was granted leave to take this interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 1292(b) from an order of the District Court denying its motion for summary judgment. We affirm and send the case back for trial. The basis of the alleged defamation

MANSFIELD, Circuit Judge: On this appeal we encounter a narcotic distribution conspiracy of the familiar “chain type” involving sophisticated suppliers, middlemen and customers who dealt in substantial amounts of heroin, conducting their business through use of coded narcotics trade language or jargon in which innocent phrases were used to describe heroin, prices and parties. Af

PER CURIAM. This is an appeal of the district court’s denial of Raymond McNeal’s pro se petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.1 We AFFIRM. I. Petitioner McNeal was indicted in the Eastern District of Michigan along with several other defendants with narcotics and firearms counts. McNeal was charged with conspiracy to distribute controlled substances (Cou

519 F.Supp. 573 (1981) John R. BALELO, Andrew Castagnola, Leo Correia, Manuel S. Jorge, Bryan R. Madruga, Harold Medina, John A. Silva, Ralph F. Silva, Jr., George Sousa, Manuel S. Vargas, Jr., John B. Zolezzi, Jr., Plaintiffs, v. Philip M. KLUTZNICK, Secretary of Commerce of the U. S., Richard A. Frank, Administrator, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and Terry Leitzell, Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, National Marine Fisher

226 F.3d 1099 (9th Cir. 2000) LLOYD W. CRAMER; DANIEL E. LIPICH, Plaintiffs Appellants,v.CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS, INC., Defendant Appellee. No. 98-55657 GUILLERMO ALFARO, Plaintiff,andDENNIS R. BLEVINS; RAY R. CASIO; STEVE CUNNINGHAM; RICK DEWOODY; ALEJANDRO GARCIA; DAVID V. GARCIA; RAUL C. GARCIA; JAMES A. GRECO; BRUCE A. HARVEY; JOHN K. HATFIELD; ROBE

129 B.R. 156 (1991) In the Matter of Antonio DEL GROSSO, Debtor. No. 90 C 7265. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. June 12, 1991. Michael Raymond Collins, Harold E. Collins, Collins & Collins, Chicago, Ill., for appellants. William S. Hill, William S. Hill, Ltd., Lansing, Ill., Jack W. Lund, Gary, Ind., for appellees. John V. Del Gaudio, Edw