Cases

ALEXANDER, J. [¶ 1] Harold Burbank II appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court (Penob-scot County, A. Murray, J.) (1) finding in favor of the owners of neighboring properties on their claims for a prescriptive easement, declaratory judgment, conversion, and punitive damages; 1 and (2) finding

487 S.E.2d 454 (1997) 226 Ga. App. 690 The STATE v. TAYLOR. No. A97A0949. Court of Appeals of Georgia. June 4, 1997. J. Gray Conger, Dist. Atty., Lori L. Canfield, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellant. Richard O. Smith, David L. Roberts, John R. Mobley II, Columbus, for appellee. HAROLD R. BANKE, Senior Appellate Judge. The S

Affirmed.

Affirmed.

274 S.W.3d 629 (2009) Glennda TAYLOR, Appellant, v. BALLARD R-II SCHOOL DISTRICT, Respondent; Treasurer of the State of Missouri— Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Respondent. No. WD 69406. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. January 27, 2009. *630 John R. Stanley, Overland Park, KS, for appellant. Howard C

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0091p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ PATRICK D. REED, │ Petitioner-Appellant,

2022 UT 35 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH DAVID JENKINS TAYLOR, Appellant, v. JILL MARIE TAYLOR, Appellee. No. 20191090 Heard: April 13, 2022 Filed August 18, 2022 On Certifi

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1932 Doc: 46 Filed: 07/25/2023 Pg: 1 of 20 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-1932 JACOBY L. GARRETT, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, individually and in his official capacity as Director of

08/12/2024 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 23, 2024 HAROLD THOMAS CENTERS, JR. v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Cumberland County No. 22-293 Wesley Thomas Bray, Judge ___________________________________

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2018-CP-00152-COA HAROLD HAYES A/K/A HAROLD HAYES, JR. APPELLANT A/K/A HAROLD RAY HAYES, JR. v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/30/2018 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. LESTER F. WILLIAMSON JR. COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: LAUDERDALE CO

558 S.E.2d 242 (2002) Dale E. TAYLOR, B.J. Fore; Dillard A. Brown, Harvey R. Cook, Jr., Thomas P. Deighton, James M. Floyd, Cathy Ann Hall, Grant Harold, Mary Rose Hart, Raymond Higgins, Kenneth D. Hinson, Allen C. Jones, James T. Malcolm, Iii, Randy W. Martin, Richard N. Oulette, Ralph Pittman, Sid A. Pope, Daniel L. Powers, Ii, Daryl D. Pruitt, Lisa D. Robertson, Ricky E. Shehan, Gregory F. Snider, Timothy C. Stoker, Ann R. Stover, Joan C. Smith, Indiv

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-18-00128-CR JAMES HAROLD MOON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 336th District Court Fannin County, Texas Trial Court No. CR-17-26337 Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ. Opinion by Justice Burgess

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1714 Doc: 56 Filed: 06/14/2022 Pg: 1 of 37 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-1714 WILLIAM THORPE; FREDERICK HAMMER; DMITRY KHAVKIN; GERALD MCNABB; GARY WALL; VERNON BROOKS; BRIAN CAVITT; DEREK CORNELISON; CHRI

[Cite as State v. Taylor, 2020-Ohio-4852.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WOOD COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. WD-19-092 Appellee Trial Court No. 2019CR0184 v. Edward Lamale Taylor DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellant

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18–6648 BRIAN DAMON FARABEE, Petitioner – Appellant, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the VA DOC; JACK BARBER, Commissioner of the DBHDS, Respondents – Appellees. No. 18–7225 BRIAN DAMON FARABEE, Petitioner – Appellant,

07/03/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE March 28, 2018 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. LEE HAROLD CROMWELL Appeal from the Circuit Court for Anderson County No. B6C00016 Paul G. Summers, Senior Judge ___________________________________

PER CURIAM. Pursuant to Rule 25 of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure, the record on appeal is deemed timely filed for good cause shown by the plaintiffs. The opinion of the Court of Appeals dismissing the appeal is, therefore, vacated and this case is remanded to that court for determination of the issues on the merits. VACATED AND REMANDED.

WALKER, Judge, dissenting. I respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision to dismiss the appeal in this case. The record indicates that class counsel for the plaintiffs timely served the proposed record on appeal. Defendants-appellees did not file any objections. Class counsel asserts he realized the proposed record on appeal became the record on appeal the day it was due in this Court. T

Judge Walker dissenting. I respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision to dismiss the appeal in this case. The record indicates that class counsel for the plaintiffs timely served the proposed record on appeal. Defendants-appellees did not file any objections. Class counsel asserts he realized the proposed record on appeal became the record on appeal the day it was due in this Court. Th

[Cite as State v. Taylor, 2020-Ohio-404.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WOOD COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. WD-19-009 Appellee Trial Court No. 2018 CR 173 v. Gregory Taylor DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellant