Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Harmon v. Kennedy”
Harmon v. Hoffmanpublic domain
In Mandamus and Prohibition. On respondents’ motion to dismiss. Motion granted. Cause dismissed. On relator’s motion to strike. Motion denied as moot. O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.
Disciplinary Counsel v. Harmonpublic domain
Per Curiam. {¶ 1} Respondent, Paul Dare Harmon of Howard, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0023923, was admitted to the Ohio bar in 1979. {¶ 2} In September 2013, relator, disciplinary counsel, submitted a complaint to the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline alleging that Harmon engaged in con
State ex rel. Bonnlander v. Harmon (Slip Opinion)public domain
Per Curiam. {¶ 1} Appellant, Timothy Bonnlander, has appealed the judgment of the Tenth District Court of Appeals denying his request for a writ of mandamus that would compel appellee, Industrial Commission, to award him compensation for permanent total disability resulting from his workplace injury. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. <
Harmon v. Cincinnatipublic domain
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Harmon v. Cincinnati, Slip Opinion No. 2024-Ohio-2889.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or
Harmon v. Cincinnatipublic domain
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 176 Ohio St.3d 379.] HARMON ET AL., APPELLEES, v. THE CITY OF CINCINNATI ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as Harmon v. Cincinnati, 2024-Ohio-2889.] Civil service—R.C. 4117.10(A)—R.C. 2506.01(A)—Common pleas court not divested of jurisdiction to hear city employees’ administrative appeal regarding whether separation from employment under temporary emergency-leave program implemented in response to C
State v. Harmonpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Harmon, 2021-Ohio-2013.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COLUMBIANA COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CODY W. HARMON, Defendant-Appellant.
DeVane v. Kennedypublic domain
519 S.E.2d 622 (1999) 205 W.Va. 519 Cheryl Richardson DEVANE, Personal Representative of the Estate of Richard Walter Richardson, Plaintiff Below, Appellee, v. George KENNEDY, M.D., and Charles Town General Hospital, Inc., d/b/a Jefferson Memorial Hospital, Defendants Below, Appellees, The West Virginia Insurance Guaranty Association, Appellant. No. 25206. Supreme Court of A
Harmon v. Harmonpublic domain
962 A.2d 959 (2009) 2009 ME 2 Monika G. HARMON v. Thomas E. HARMON. Docket: Cum-08-351. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Submitted on Briefs: December 12, 2008. Decided: January 13, 2009. *960 Ray R. Pallas, Esq., Law Office of Ray R. Pallas, Portland, ME, for Monika G. Harmon. Dian
State v. Harmonpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Harmon, 2017-Ohio-320.] COURT OF APPEALS TUSCARAWAS COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JUDGES: STATE OF OHIO : Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, P. J. : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, J. Plaintiff-Appellant : Hon.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Kennedypublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 25-1611 AMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION; IBIS REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH; INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE, AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS (UAW); BRITTANY CHARLTON; KATIE EDWARDS; PETER LURIE; and NICOLE MAPHIS, Plaintiffs, Appellees, v. NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH; JAY BHATTACHARYA, in his official capacity as
State v. Harmonpublic domain
PETERS, J. hThe defendant, Daniel Joseph Harmon, appeals his conviction of second degree murder, a violation of La.R.S. 14:30.1. For the following reasons, we affirm the defendant’s conviction in all respects. DISCUSSION OF THE RECORD This criminal appeal has as its origins the July 25, 1989 tragic murder of Christina Marie Wood.1 At the time of her
Harmon, D., Aplt. v. UCBRpublic domain
[J-62-2018] [MO: Dougherty, J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT DANIEL HARMON, : No. 37 EAP 2017 : Appellant : Appeal from the Order of : Commonwealth Court entered on 06- : 07-2
Rodney Harmon v. State of Arkansaspublic domain
Cite as 2020 Ark. 217 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-18-1057 Opinion Delivered: May 28, 2020 RODNEY HARMON APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE FAULKNER COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V. [NO. 23CR-15-702] STATE OF ARKANSAS HONORABLE CHARLES E. C
State v. Kennedypublic domain
[Cite as State v. Kennedy, 2018-Ohio-4997.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT CLARK COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Plaintiff-Appellee : Appellate Case No. 2017-CA-100 : v.
Harmon v. Harmonpublic domain
[1] The parties are two women who vied for the affections of the late Obie E. Harmon. Elizabeth, who was married to him for nearly 28 years seeks damages from Margaret whose "wiles and blandishments" she says enticed Obie from his former home and caused his affections for her to wane. In advance of trial the court granted defendant a summary judgment on the ground that the record disclosed uncontrovertibly that Elizabeth's action is barred by the statute of limitations. Hence the only
The Kennedy Com. v. Super. Ct.public domain
Filed 9/11/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE KENNEDY COMMISSION, D085237 Petitioner, (San Diego County Super. Ct. No. 30-2023-01312235- v. CU-WM-CJC) THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY,
Disciplinary Counsel v. Harmon (Slip Opinion)public domain
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Disciplinary Counsel v. Harmon, Slip Opinion No. 2019-Ohio-4171.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any
RODNEY HARMON v. STATE OF ARKANSASpublic domain
Cite as 2020 Ark. 217 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-18-1057 Opinion Delivered: May 28, 2020 RODNEY HARMON APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE FAULKNER COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V. [NO. 23CR-15-702] STATE OF ARKANSAS HONORABLE CHARLES
Kennedy v. Carnival Corp.public domain
EDWIN G. TORRES. United States Magistrate Judge This matter is before the Court on Carnival Corporation's ("Defendant" or "Carnival") motion to dismiss Kathleen Kennedy's ("Plaintiff") amended complaint. [D.E. 40]. Plaintiff responded on October 9, 2018 [D.E. 48] to which Carnival replied on *1311October 26, 2018. [D.E. 55]. On November 5, 2
Harmon v. Statepublic domain
649 S.W.2d 93 (1982) Harold Emery HARMON, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 13-81-372-cr. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi. December 30, 1982. Rehearing Denied February 10, 1983. *94 Randell W. Friebele, Ferrero, Brasch, Friebele, & Mardis, Harlingen, for appellant. Reynaldo Cantu, J