Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Harmon Drew”
Harmon v. Statepublic domain
248 P.3d 918 (2011) 2011 OK CR 6 Marlon Dean HARMON, Appellant, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee. No. D-2008-657. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. January 27, 2011. As Corrected April 1, 2011. *926 Catherine Hammarsten, Jacob Benedict, Assistant Public Defenders, Oklahoma County Public
Harmon v. Statepublic domain
SUMMARY OPINION ¶ 1 Sonny Lauren Harmon was jointly tried and convicted of Second Degree Burglary *Page 862 in violation of 21 O.S. 2001, § 1435[21-1435] in the District Court of Garvin County, Case Nos. CF-2002-53, CF-2002-55, and CF-2002-57; and of Feloniously Carrying a Weapon in violation of 21 O.S. 2001, § 1283[21-1283], in the Dis
State ex rel. Butts v. Drewpublic domain
In re Butts, Larry D.; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Webster, 26th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 53,681; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 23729-KA. Denied. See La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; State ex rel. Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La. 1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172. MARCUS, J., not on panel.
Law Solutions Chi. LLC v. U.S. Tr.public domain
ELIZABETH ERNY FOOTE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is an appeal from an order of the United States Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Louisiana. Appellant, Law Solutions Chicago, LLC, doing business as UpRight Law, LLC ("UpRight"), appeals from the Bankruptcy Court's Order [Bankr. Doc. 41]1 ("the Order") on the United States Trustee's Motion to Disgorge Fees and For Other Appropriate
United States v. Paul Harmonpublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ___________ No. 24-2057 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PAUL HARMON, Appellant On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (District Court No. 2:20-cr-00382-001) District Judge: H
Valentine v. Drewpublic domain
DIXON, Judge. This is a suit on a note. After judgment for the plaintiff, the defendant appealed; plaintiff answers the appeal complaining of certain compensation or set-off allowed by the District Court. Defendant-appellant has neither appeared nor filed brief prior to date fixed for submission of this case, and the appeal will be dismissed in accordance with Section 5(b) of Rule VII of the Uniform Rules
Drew v. Parkerpublic domain
TUCKER, Judge. In this suit plaintiffs, R. Harmon Drew, Parey P. Branton and Warren E. Dietrich, appeal from the summary judgment of the trial court dismissing their suit against the defendant, Mary Evelyn Parker, Treasurer, State of Louisiana, in which the plaintiffs had sought to have Acts Nos. 24, 25 and 26 of the Regular Session of the Legislature of 1970, amending respectively LSA-R.S. 13:102, 13:311 and 13:691, declared
PER CURIAM: * This dispute over twenty-three immigration bonds stems from ongoing litigation between the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) and AAA Bonding Agency, Inc. (“AAA”) about more than 1,400 bonds DHS deemed breached by AAA and its co-obligor, Safety National Casualty Corporation (“Safety National”). In AAA Bonding Agency Inc. v. United States Department of Homeland Security (“AA
Harmon v. City of Arlingtonpublic domain
Case: 20-10830 Document: 00516070346 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/26/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 26, 2021
Autry, Bobby Drewpublic domain
§:/,W Tr..ct. Nn. m03-25657-u(A)v h mR~B1,972;04 Ex PARTE §- IN THE cnuRT nF cRIMINAL § APPEALS UF TEXAS BnBBv DREm AUTRY AT AusTIN, TEXAS suPPLl-:MENT'AL' -ADDENnuM Tn' RECE,VED'N THE'nRIsINAu mRIT nF HABEAS canugoURTOFCRMMNALAPPEALS DEC 1 6 2015 TU THE HUNURABLE BDURT BF APQEALS: BDMES NUM, BDBBY DREM AUTRV, the applicant hen§@@LAe@§mféh§§ ` ’ . this supplemental addendum to the original writ of habeas corpus. This supplemental addendum is made because the original writ of habeas corpus
Autry, Bobby Drewpublic domain
APPEAL NO. WR-81,972-04 BOBBY DRE~·J AUTRY IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL vs. APPEALS OF TEXAS AT THE STATE OF TEXAS ;;, .,) TD A iTT C J..\.Cl.W..LU
Donna Harmon v. Texas Southern Universitypublic domain
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed June 15, 2023. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-21-00125-CV DONNA HARMON, Appellant V. TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY, Appellee On Appeal from the 270th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 202
United States v. Harmonpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Criminal Action No. 19-395 (BAH) LARRY DEAN HARMON, Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendant, Larry Dean Harmon, is charged in three counts related to his alleged operation of Helix, an un
Harmon v. City of Arlingtonpublic domain
Case: 20-10830 Document: 00516071044 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/27/2021 REVISED United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED
Autry, Bobby Drewpublic domain
'Ae..-h'+.?net'5 DI'~J; f\a.... \ Cond; ~;CHI S "" €x\tt~ b;+ I \.'~. Tn ·F"t··-·:·•!anc;:. wl.Pl tht: nt;t~~o~·i.ty ~~'"'T"\f~rred 'i'-Y !:i!l;' i,r1111r. ~-,-(\~;.!ll'.1::""r1 .511(\ p.-~r:.J.::o L.:'l•·: -::,' r-.!1
People v. Harmonpublic domain
ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court People v. Harmon, 2012 IL App (3d) 110297 Appellate Court THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Caption TIMOTHY HARMON, Defendant-Appellant. District & No. Third District Docket No. 3-11-0297 Rule 23 Order filed June 7, 2012 Motion to publish allowed
782 F.Supp.2d 420 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. SAFETY NATIONAL CASUALTY CORPORATION and AAA Bonding Agency, Inc., Defendants. Civil Action No. 4:10-cv-3573. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. March 21, 2011. *421 J. Christopher Kohn, Marcus Scott Sacks, Richard Harmon Drew, US Dept. of J
Cristal v. Harmonpublic domain
137 Ga. App. 153 (1976) 223 S.E.2d 210 CRISTAL v. HARMON et al. 50997. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Argued September 3, 1975. Decided January 5, 1976. Ronald N. Winston, Drew J. Kovalak, for appellant. Spence, Garrett & Spence, D. William Garrett, Jr., for appellees. PANNELL, Presiding Judge.</
United States v. Danny Harmonpublic domain
TINDER, Circuit Judge. A jury convicted Danny Harmon of a marijuana conspiracy and related offenses. The district court sentenced him to 360 months’ imprisonment. Harmon appeals his convictions and sentence. He first contends that a trial continuance violated his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial and that the disclosure of his prior drug conviction deprived him of a fair tri
USCA11 Case: 18-13592 Date Filed: 07/14/2021 Page: 1 of 80 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 18-13592 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 3:17-cv-00739-TJC-JBT DREW ADAMS, a minor, by and