Cases

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS (#13) COLLINGS, United States Magistrate Judge. I. Introduction On December 9, 2011, plaintiffs Dr. Thomas Hardiman (“Hardiman”) and Affil*249iated Foot Care, PC (“AFC”) filed a three-count complaint (# 1) against the United States and Martin Flynn in hi

The defendant was convicted in the recorder's court for the city of Detroit of murder in the second degree. To review such conviction he brings error. It is the claim of the people that on October 21, 1925, he shot and killed one Alberta Hatter. The proofs show that the parties were illicitly living together, and on the night of the killing had attended a party where they quarreled because she refused to go home with him. After attempting violence and making some threats as to what he would d

Opinion by Mr. Justice Potter, This was an action brought upon a policy of fire insurance to recover for a loss by fire. The property insured consisted of a dwelling house and farm buildings located in Burlington county, N. J., and owned by the plaintiff. The policy was of the standard form prescribed by statute in New Jersey and contained among its conditions the following clause: “ This ent

RESTREPO, Circuit Judge. Vernel Aubrey Williams appeals his judgment of conviction and the sentence imposed by the District Court, contending that his rights under the Speedy Trial Act of 1974, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161 - 3174, were violated. Williams argues

OPINION * CHAGARES, Circuit Judge. Jace Clendinen appeals from a jury verdict that found him guilty of violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(k). We will affirm the District Court’s judgment of conviction. I. Because we write solely for the benefit of the parties, we will only briefly summarize the essential facts. On September 1,

BIBAS, Circuit Judge. In 2008, the U.S. government strove to rescue the collapsing economy. Its extreme measures helped many, but others suffered as a result. One of the rescue measures, the Housing and Economic Recovery Act, authorized the government to act as conservator for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, two government-sponsored enterprises with critical roles in the home-mortgage mar

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ___________ No. 16-1345 ___________ VALSPAR CORPORATION; VALSPAR SOURCING, INC., Appellant v. E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY __________ On Appeal from the United

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PHILIP R. SHAWE and SHIRLEY § SHAWE, § No. 423, 2016 § § Respondents Below- § Appellants, § Court Below—Court of Chancery § of the State of Delaware v. §

993 A.2d 1057 (2010) AXIS REINSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendant Below, Appellants, v. HLTH CORPORATION and Emdeon Practice Services, Inc., Plaintiff Below, Appellees. HLTH Corporation and Emdeon Practice Services, Inc., Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, v. Axis Reinsurance Company, et al., Defendants Below, Appellees. Nos. 565, 2009, 569, 2009. Supreme Court of Delaware.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 17-1222 _____________ JOSEPH A. BROWN, Appellant v. DR. SAGE, (Psych Dept.); DR. EIGENBRODE, (Psych Dept.); DR. SHOUEY, (Psych Dept.) _____________ No. 17-1527 _____________ JOSEPH A. BR

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 25-1644 _____________ BETTE EAKIN; DSCC; DCCC; AFT PENNSYLVANIA v. ADAMS COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; ALLEGHENY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; BEAVER COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; BEDFORD COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; BERKS COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; BLAIR COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; B

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______ No. 23-2574 ______ AMBER COOK, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellant v. GAMESTOP, INC. ______ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District

WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judge, concurring: I concur in the majority opinion, but I write separately to explain the error of the argument of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the dissent that a person who experiences discrimination because of sexual orientation necessarily experiences discrimination for deviating from gender stereotypes. Although a person who experiences the former will someti

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 23-3235 IN RE: BPS DIRECT, LLC; CABELA’S, LLC WIRETAPPING LITIGATION BRIAN CALVERT; HEATHER CORNELL; TIMOTHY DURHAM; MARILYN HERNANDEZ; GREG MOORE, JR.; ET AL., Appellants _____________________________ Appeal from the U.S. District Court, E.D. Pa. Judge Mark A. Kearney, Nos. 2:23-md-03074, 2:22-cv-04709, 2:23-cv-02282, 2:23-cv-022

OPINION PER CURIAM. The defendant, George Raymond (defendant), was convicted of assault with the intent to commit robbery after a jury-waived trial. He sought a new trial pursuant to Rule 33 of the Superior Court Rules of Criminal Procedure. The trial justice denied his motion and sentenced him to fifteen years at the Adult Correctional Institutions, with five years to serve. This case came before the Cou

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ Nos. 17-1222, 17-1527, 17-1714 _____________ JOSEPH A. BROWN, Appellant v. DR. SAGE, (Psych Dept.); DR. EIGENBRODE, (Psych Dept.); DR. SHOUEY, (Psych Dept.) Appellees in No. 17-1222

617 F.3d 775 (2010) Clifford T. NEWMAN, Jr., Appellant v. Jeffrey A. BEARD, Director of the Department of Corrections; Michael Green, Chairman of Probation and Parole Board of Pennsylvania; Diane L. Dombach, Director of Sexual Offenders Assessment Board. No. 08-2652. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued April 15, 2010. Filed August 16, 2010.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT No: 22-2870 United States of America Appellee v. Edell Jackson Appellant ______________________________________________________________________________

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 22-2846 ___________ TONY FISHER, a/k/a Kellie Rehanna, Appellant v. WARDEN JORDAN HOLLINGSWORTH; WARDEN DOE; UNIT DOE, Unit Manager, MS. FISCHER; MR. WILLIAMS; N. WATKINS WARD; ANNA MORFE; STACIE D. MARANTZ-TATTERSDI; FEDERAL

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SOLERA HOLDINGS, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. NO.: N18C-08-315 AML CCLD ) XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE ) COMPANY, ACE AMERICAN ) INSURANCE COMPANY, ) ILLINOIS NATIONAL INSURANCE ) COMPANY, ARGUONAUT ) INSURANCE COMPANY, HUDSON ) INSURANCE COMPANY, ) ENDURANCE AMERICAN