Cases

497 F.Supp.2d 1214 (2007) Larry HARDEN, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. No. CV 05-1283MO. United States District Court, D. Oregon. August 2, 2007. *1215 Tim D. Wilborn, Wilborn Law Office, P.C., Tim Wilborn, Attorney at Law, Oregon City, for Larry Harden, Plaintiff. Joanne Elizabeth Da

OPINION PER CURIAM: The Social Security Administration denied Shane Costa’s application for social security disability benefits. Costa sought review of that decision in the Oregon district court. The federal magistrate judge who presided over Costa’s action determined that the agency’s decision improperly disregarded the opinions of an examining psych

624 F.Supp.2d 357 (2008) Nicholas CHONKO, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. Master File: No. 06-CV-1647 (WJM). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. April 22, 2008. *358 Agnes S. Wladyka, Agnes S. Wladyka, LLC, Jon C. Dubin, Rutgers School of Law-Newark, Urban Legal Clinic, Newark, NJ

535 F.Supp.2d 604 (2008) Jerry L. SHINABERRY, Plaintiff; v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. Civil Action No. 1:07CV28. United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia. March 7, 2008. *605 Judith C. Walz, Lewisburg, WV, for Plaintiff. Helen Campbell. Altmeyer, U.S. Attorney's Office, Wheeling, WV

Appellate Case: 25-7052 Document: 31-1 Date Filed: 07/14/2026 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 14, 2026

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0080p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT JOHN K. HARDEN, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellant, │ v. │

MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Heartfield, District Judge. Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the final decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services denying plaintiffs application for disability insurance benefits. The court heretofore ordered that this matter be referred to

45 F.Supp.2d 812 (1999) Judy TRUITT, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. No. Civ. 98-6160-JO. United States District Court, D. Oregon. March 9, 1999. *813 Brent Wells, Johnson Cram Harder & Wells, Eugene, OR, for plaintiff. William W. Youngman, Assistant United States Attorney,

OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT E. JONES, District Judge: Claimant John P. Bergstad seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner 1 of the Social Security Administration denying him disability insurance benefits (SSD) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits. This court has jurisdiction to review the Commissioner’s decision pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g

938 So.2d 480 (2006) STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. GABRIEL HARDEN, et al., Appellees. No. SC04-613. Supreme Court of Florida. May 18, 2006. Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Christopher M. Kise, Solicitor General, Louis F. Hubener, Chief Deputy Solicitor General, Lynn C. Heran, Deputy Solicitor General, and Jason Vail, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahasse

(2008) David FRANSON, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. No. 4:06-cv-140. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division. April 11, 2008. OPINION ROBERT HOLMES BELL, Chief Judge. This is a social security action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking review of a final decision of the Commissione

528 F.Supp.2d 728 (2007) Gloria J. HOLLAND, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. No. 1:06-cv-163. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division. September 27, 2007. Themis J. Fotieo, Reamon Fotieo Szczytko & Fedewa, PC, Grand Rapids, MI, for Plaintiff. Ronald M. Stella, U.S. Attorney, Grand Rapids, MI, for Defendant.<

FEINBERG, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Green-Younger appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Christopher F. Droney, J.), accepting the recommended ruling of Magistrate Judge William I. Garfinkel to affirm the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) denying Green-Younger’s application for social security disability benefits. O

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Diane Lynn Richardson v. Civil No. 20-cv-489-LM Opinion No. 2021 DNH 134 P Andrew Saul, Commissioner, U.S. Social Security Administration ORDER Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), Diane Lynn Richardson seeks judicial review of the decision of

149 F.3d 1190 98 CJ C.A.R. 3321 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995,

924 A.2d 247 (2007) Annette HARDEN, Rose Thomas, Nickea Nicole Rowe, Dawn Michelle Rowe, Aline Black and the City of Wilmington, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Delaware, Plaintiffs, v. The CHRISTINA SCHOOL DISTRICT, The Christina School District Board of Education, and James R. Durr, Dr. John Mackenzie, Gina Backus, Dr. Karl B. Brockenbrough, George E. Evans, Beverly A. Howell, David Resler, and Dr. Lillian M. Lowery (in their official c

OPINION1 BY Judge LEAVITT. Raymon Harden petitions for review of an adjudication of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board) that declined to revise the maximum sentence date it calculated for Harden after he was recommitted as a convicted parole violator. Harden contends that the Board abused its discretion by refusing to give him credit for the time he spent in two

OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ROSEN, District Judge. On February 7, 2001, Magistrate Judge Wallace Capel, Jr. issued a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) recommending that the Court deny Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment and grant Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff filed objections to the R & R on February 20, 2001. The Court

BOWMAN, Circuit Judge. Julaine Ostronski appeals the final order of the District Court 1 granting summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner, thus affirming the decision of the Social Security Administration denying Ostronski’s claim for Social Security Disability benefits. For reversal, Ostronski argues the District

*232 ROSS, Circuit Judge. Appellant Marvin G. Jenkins appeals from the district court’s order affirming the denial of his application for Social Security disability benefits. Because we conclude the decision by the administrative law judge (ALJ) is supported by substantial evidence, we affirm.